Tuesday, August 08, 2006

45% of precincts

Lamont 76,000
Lieberman 66,000

with 45%

Secy of state says their Web site is down because of way too much traffic

Most of absentee ballots are in and being counted now.

Kevin Rennie, Hartford Courant columnist reporting that Rs are waiting by the phones to endorse Joe and step on a Lamont win story --- take that for what it's worth.
at

15 comments:

  1. B8/08/2006 9:38 PM

    376 of 748 Precincts Reporting - 50.27%
    Name Party Votes Pct
    Lamont Dem 70,444 52.13
    LiebermanDem 64,700 47.87

    ReplyDelete
  2. Anonymous8/08/2006 9:39 PM

    376 of 748 Precincts Reporting - 50.27%
    Name Party Votes Pct
    Lamont, Ned Dem 70,444 52.13
    Lieberman, Joe (i) Dem 64,700 47.87

    ReplyDelete
  3. Anonymous8/08/2006 9:39 PM

    It's getting tighter.

    According to the latest, it's 52 Lamont - 48 Lieberman, with a little over 50% reporting.

    http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/files/elections/2006/by_state/CT_Page_0808.html?SITE=CTHARELN&SECTION=POLITICS

    ReplyDelete
  4. Anonymous8/08/2006 9:41 PM

    Bob's numbers:

    Lamont 53.5
    Lieberman 46.4

    ReplyDelete
  5. Anonymous8/08/2006 9:42 PM

    This is a nailbiter.

    How do these results usually break in CT?

    ReplyDelete
  6. B8/08/2006 9:42 PM

    Getting closer:

    404 of 748 Precincts Reporting - 54.01%
    Name Party Votes Pct
    Lamont Dem 74,396 51.98
    LiebermanDem 68,718 48.02

    ReplyDelete
  7. Aquaria8/08/2006 9:43 PM

    It's getting way too tight, way too fast... I dunno, this one may go down to the wire...

    ReplyDelete
  8. Anonymous8/08/2006 9:43 PM

    SecState says out of staters are crashing their results site?

    This CLOWN blogging for the NYT just posted another link to the CT SecState site like 10 minutes ago, and no sooner than the state site had been back up.. its been downed AGAIN!

    http://empirezone.blogs.nytimes.com/?p=504

    ReplyDelete
  9. Anonymous8/08/2006 9:45 PM

    "Getting closer:"

    Yup, and the Hartford Courant now seems to have a fast connection for the numbers...

    ReplyDelete
  10. Anonymous8/08/2006 9:47 PM

    Lets hope that this is really the effect from pro Lieberman city results coming in, and not some rethug hacker connected to the voting machines :(

    ReplyDelete
  11. Anonymous8/08/2006 9:48 PM

    Ned is pulling out a bit more...little bit'

    ReplyDelete
  12. Anonymous8/08/2006 9:48 PM

    423 of 748 - 56.55%

    Lamont, Ned Dem 79,580 52.17
    Lieberman, Joe Dem 72,964 47.83

    ReplyDelete
  13. Anonymous8/08/2006 9:49 PM

    Bridgport is 51% to Lieberman with 20/25 reporting

    ReplyDelete
  14. Anonymous8/08/2006 9:49 PM

    Update from the Ballroom
    80% Reporting
    Lamont 117,000
    Lieberman 103,000

    ReplyDelete
  15. Anonymous8/08/2006 9:50 PM

    It's gonna be close, but not that close. My guess for final tally: Lamont 53, Lieberman 47

    ReplyDelete