One Minute with Alan Schlesinger

Tonight was the second interview we've done with Republican candidate for Senate Alan Schlesinger. He discussed many issues that are important as we move into the last week of the Senate campaign, some of them quite frankly. Be sure to check back later as I upload more clips from this very interesting interview.

This is a simple, one-minute "get to know you" video.

One minute with Alan Schlesinger.


And please visit Schlesinger2006.com.

Videos of Crossroads' faith-based interviews

Several weeks ago Shane Griffiths from Crossroads Magazine interviewed Ned Lamont (which I then co-opted and posted here) along with the other two Senate candidates on faith-based issues. The finished program was aired last weekend, and CT residents will be able to see it again Wednesday, Nov. 1 at 5:30 a.m. on WTXX the CW Channel 20.

They have the video online. Here's the two-part interviews with the three Senate candidates, on these issues:

- Faith in politics
- Health Care
- Choice
- Gay Marriage

I like the format of the interviews; it has the feeling of a debate, where all three candidates answer the exact same question, but they were interviewed at different times and places. This results is sincere answers that are untainted by the other candidate's replies.

I'd like to see this format expanded and used more in the future (by me, of course). It allows the voters to see the candidates' views on specific issues compared with each other, in a straight forward manner.

Great job with this, Shane.

(UPDATE: The videos below were apparently removed from Youtube, so if you want to see the portion of the interview featuring Ned Lamont which I taped and posted myself, please click on THIS LINK)


Part One


Part Two

What more do you need?

Senator Bush Lieberman is in George's back pocket, and has been since the War began.



If you've had enough of Joe Lieberman's "Campaign of Corruption", then DO SOMETHING ABOUT IT!

You have one week left to change the world!

How often do you get an opportunity like that?

Volunteer for Ned Lamont
Volunteer for Ned Lamont
Volunteer for Ned Lamont
Volunteer for Ned Lamont
Volunteer for Ned Lamont
Volunteer for Ned Lamont

Beware of "Danger Kitty"!

His "meow" is worse than his bite!
Just having some fun on this fine Halloween morning.

(This is what happens when I don't have to go to work first thing!)

R?!? WTF?

ABC News showing some of that award-winning reportering.

Barred campaign worker employed by Lieberman

Senator Lieberman's campaign of corruption is exposed in yet another scandal.

From today's Hartford Courant:

Activist Denies Violating Ban On Ballot Work
October 31, 2006
By DANIEL E. GOREN, Courant Staff Writer

A Hartford Democrat who was fined and barred from involvement in absentee ballot activities last year is working for a company hired by Sen. Joseph I. Lieberman's campaign to do voter outreach in the city - including the distribution of absentee ballot applications.

Prenzina Holloway was fined $10,000 in July 2005 and ordered not to distribute absentee ballot applications or to assist voters with the ballots for two years, after the State Elections Enforcement Commission found that she had forged a voter's signature in the 2004 election.

Holloway acknowledges working for Urban Voters and Associates, a company paid $17,550 by the Lieberman campaign since September to do "field work." But she said she isn't involved in the company's absentee ballot operations.

"That is just a no-no," she said. "And I know it is a no-no."

But five people at a Vine Street housing complex for the elderly have told The Courant that Holloway and another person came to their doors to give them absentee ballot applications, and a security worker at another complex on Woodland Street said Holloway tried to get into the building to distribute applications there. Holloway was barred from the building after getting into a verbal altercation with the worker after he made supportive comments about Lieberman's main challenger, Ned Lamont.

Other sources at the building said she called back a week later to try to "sweet talk" her way into the facility.

[...]

Holloway committed absentee ballot fraud in the 2004 election when she voted on behalf of, and forged the signature of, at least one voter, according to the State Elections Enforcement Commission. The commission also found evidence that Holloway was in the same room with at least two other voters as they filled out absentee ballots, a violation of state election law.

Holloway was fined $10,000, but because of financial hardship was made to pay only $2,000. She also signed an agreement saying she would "refrain from distributing absentee ballot applications and shall not assist with absentee ballot applications for a period of two years," starting April 1, 2005.

[...]

But Claudia Dismuke, 85, was one of five voters at Mary Mahoney Village on Vine Street who said Holloway and an older man came to their doors several weeks ago to give them absentee ballot applications. Dismuke said she has known Holloway for years.

"She came by with another man," Dismuke said. "She helped me fill it out and then I put the stamp on it. I mailed it in."

Four other residents at Mary Mahoney Village - James Hightower, Olga Morales, Angelito Vazques and Dorothy McKinley - said they did not know Holloway personally but recognized her when shown a picture. All four said Holloway had given them applications.

There you go again, Senator. Breaking laws that you feel shouldn't apply to you.

How long will you be allowed to get away with this kind of behaviour?

Read the rest of the article via the link at the top of this page.

Furious Joe's Campaign Writes a Letter

From LamontBlog: When most candidates lose a newspaper endorsement - even one as potentially influential as the New York Times' - they let it go. They might go so far as mutter something under their breath about newspaper endorsements being meaningless. About how the voters are the things that matter.

Not Joe Lieberman.

"Danger Face"
And not Dan Gerstein, who, upon reading the New York Times' reasoned, articulate editorial absolutely dismantling his candidate's carefully constructed post-primary PR, sat down to furiously bang out an official letter of protest (impressively enough, at the same time his head was apparently exploding) to the "liberal media" heavyweight.

The blog post introducing the letter opens with this gem, echoing Lieberman supporters across the right-wing by accusing the Times of being biased and having a "clear partisan agenda":

"Danger Duck"

We fully expected that the New York Times, given its strong anti-war stance and clear partisan agenda, would repeat their misguided primary endorsement of Ned Lamont for the general election. But we never imagined the Times of all papers would produce such an intellectually dishonest and shoddy editorial as they published Sunday.

The Gerstein letter itself goes on to accuse the Times of being:

• dishonest,


• "ill-informed,"


• "tendentious,"


• biased,


• "narrow-minded,"


• willfully ignorant,


• lacking "rigor,"


• "disinterested" in the truth,


• and intellectually captive to... wait for it... bloggers...

"Danger Kitty"
...all in the first five paragraphs.

And there are twenty-nine petulantly virtiolic paragraphs that follow:

All of this goes to show that if anyone is guilty of not facing reality, it is the Times editors. You clearly overlooked all the signs that Senator Lieberman was listening and that his views could and did evolve. Instead, you repackaged the distorted caricature the Lamont campaign has been peddling for several months to serve your own ideological agenda.

The truth is, the only way Joe Lieberman could have won with the Times editors was to compromise his principles and recant his support for the war. And in much the same way, the only acceptable definition of changing course for the Times was a politically-determined timetable for troop withdrawal -– a path that has been rejected as a threat to our national security interests by many critics of the Bush Administration, including the overwhelming majority of Senate Democrats, and our military leadership.

The most blatant evidence that the fix was in was your assertion that Mr. Lamont is “the far better candidate” to serve in the U.S. Senate. That is simply incomprehensible – and frankly an insult to your readers’ intelligence....

"Danger Nut"
It is quite telling that the Times, much like the bloggers who have been trying to purge Joe Lieberman from the Democratic Party, failed to acknowledge any of these accomplishments and stands – or to explain why they were not relevant to your endorsement process....

Or, not least of all, the Times editors did not acknowledge the consequences of losing Senator Lieberman’s seniority for the people of Connecticut and for many of the progressive causes the Times has long championed.

That is probably because you long ago convicted him of not being ideologically pure enough and of not being reflexively hostile enough to his Republican colleagues. You clearly wanted another finger-pointer in the Senate, and Ned Lamont wins that contest hands down.

It's really perplexing. What good can come of this letter? Other than to direct people to the decidedly sane and civil - and convincing - endorsement from the Times that made Gerstein fly into such a rage.

What it shows is how Joe's is and always has been a campaign based entirely on entitlement, indignation, and anger. He was angry at having to face a primary challenge. He was insulted that anyone would ask him to defend his record. And he's been in furious rage at the Connecticut voters who rebuked him in a record turnout in August.

"Danger Joe"
And guess who he'll take that anger out on if he wins.

Atty. General Blumenthal on the investigations

Last night at the Dave Mooney for State Rep birthday party, I spoke to Connecticut Attorney General Richard Blumenthal about some of the important issues going into the final week of the campaign.

The most important issue seems to be the "Lieberman Campaign Slush Fund" scandal, but I also asked about the supposed "hacking" claim by "Stick with Joe" Lieberman's campaign. Watch what the AG says about that.

Joe can't stick with "Stay the Course"

In this 13-second video, you can easily see the way George Bush and his little lapdog Joe Lieberman now insist that they never believed in "Stay the Course".

Joe (recently): "I am NOT for stay the course".

He must think you're all a bunch of dopes.


This is another betrayal from Joe Lieberman, this time to the maybe 1/3 of the voters out there who approve of our policy in Iraq and believe in "Stay the Course".

Joe is suddenly in favor of a phased withdrawal. That's what I call a betrayal to you "Stay the Course" people.

So now you don't have ANY reason to vote for Joe; and if it comes down to which candidate has always been 100% clear on Iraq and never LIED about his position, there's only one choice.

Ned Lamont.

Why would anyone still "stick with Joe" at this point?

He's got all the "sticktoitofness" of a fried egg on a teflon pan that's been sprayed with vegatable oil and WD-40.

How's THAT for sticking it to Joe?

Meet Joe and Mayor Bloomberg Tomorrow, 7:45 am, Stamford Train Station

From My Left Nutmeg, by Branford Boy:

Joe Lieberman and Mayor Michael "I want a commuter tax" Bloomberg will be holding a joint campaign appearance at the Stamford train station tomorrow (Monday, Oct 30) from 7:45 a.m.

Some concerned citizens may show up and distribute a flyer something like this:

If you can knock out something better, be my guest. In the meantime, you can download the quick and dirty version and print up as many as you'd like.

"Senator Sellout" cozies up to Bloomberg

Wow.

Apparently (according to Joe Lieberman) Ned Lamont's wealth is somehow tainted, but Michael Bloomberg's BILLION DOLLARS is pure manna from heaven!

So while Senator Lieberman spews lies out of one side of his mouth and implies Ned's family fortune was earned through mysterious and shady means, Joe uses the other side of his mouth to plant a sloppy wet kiss on Micheal Bloomberg's ass cheek.

Because Mayor Bloomberg, the billionaire Republican who spent over $77,000,000 of his own money to campaign for the Mayorship of New York, is eager to impose his OUT OF STATE influence on Connecticut's Senate race.

From an AP story on CNN.com:

The mayor has also dispatched several campaign operatives to Connecticut to help Lieberman reach GOP and independent voters as the race closes. Lieberman is running as an independent after losing to wealthy businessman Ned Lamont in the Democratic primary.

"The mayor has been extremely generous personally in being willing to help us raise money," Lieberman spokesman Dan Gerstein said.

Bloomberg appeared at a major Chicago fundraising event for Lieberman recently. He will campaign with Lieberman on Monday in Stamford, greeting commuters and formally endorsing him. Bloomberg will also host a fundraiser next week at his home, Gerstein said.

Bloomberg operatives are helping to build Lieberman's get-out-the-vote effort, which is targeting a mix of Democratic, Republican and independent supporters.

"We're leveraging the very relevant experience of the Bloomberg operation to help us in what can charitably be described as a unique situation," said Gerstein.

The Bloomberg team has valuable experience identifying such voters in New York City, which is considered Democratic turf, said Gerstein.

Bloomberg also is backing Connecticut Republicans Gov. M. Jodi Rell and Rep. Christopher Shays, who is locked in a tough re-election fight.

So, not only are Republican "operatives" going to be flooding the state, but Mayor Bloomberg is also betraying his own party by not supporting the Republican candidate for Senate, Alan Schlesinger.

No wonder Lieberman loves Bloomberg.

They're two of a kind.

TO CONNECTICUT VOTERS: Don't let the out-of-state operatives decide the election for you!

Rosa DeLauro for Ned Lamont

Connecticut Congresswoman Rosa DeLauro (D-3) spoke at the Branford DTC on Friday. She explained why we need Ned Lamont to be our senator; watch the video:

Hartford Courant in Joe's pocket long ago

How can Ned Lamont expect fair and unbiased reporting from a newspaper that long ago cast it's lot with three-term incumbant senator Joe Lieberman?

(UPDATE: The Hartford Courant finally pulled down the page, and Reader Rep Karen Hunter posted this article in the Courant's blog, along with other reader complaints. Link to that blog entry is HERE. I just love how everything that helps Lieberman is a "computer glitch". Funny how there aren't any pro-Lamont glitches happening anywhere!)

If the Hartford Courant's ownership is backing the senator, as they've stated this weekend by endorsing Lieberman, then obviously that bias will trickle down through every corner of the newspaper's operations; from it's reporters to it's web site. Here's a perfect example (click image to enlarge):

This appeared on the Courant.com website last Thursday. Someone was apparently testing some feature on the website, and uploaded this page for public viewing.

Happens all the time.

But when you read the fine print, you can see where the Courant's priorities lie.

"TEST BULLETIN -- The following is a TEST. Joe Lieberman, CTL, elected U.S. Senate, Connecticut."

This "test bulletin" was attributed to the "AP STATE WIRE", which graphically shows what the newspaper hopes and works toward what might happen.

Here's the link to the actual Courant webpage that shows the "bulletin", but I expect it to disappear at any moment once they realize it is being seen by people.

When you have "institutionalized bias" like this that infects every facet of a news organization, you can't possibly expect fair coverage from a paper.

(h/t to reader Peter Jung)

The "Find Joe" Song

Today Joe Lieberman's campaign released a clever little ditty designed to assist his mentally-challenged supporters find his place on the ballot. You can listen to it HERE.

But here's a more accurate depiction of the song, with video goodness added. Enjoy!

Joe Lieberman is a Liar

This past Thursday, I attended the Milford DTC meeting (my first) and afterwards I spoke to DTC member James Quish.

Jim was quoted in the October 19th issue of Milford Weekly about Joe Lieberman's phone call to him. From the article:

Jim Quish (on right, with Ned), of Milford, was also a delegate at the Connecticut Democratic (convention) and said that one of the main reasons why he is casting his support for Lamont is because Lieberman, who Quish says personally told him he wouldn't run as an independent if he lost the primary, went back on his word.

"Lieberman called me at my house because he wanted my vote at the convention," said Quish. "He said, 'No Jim, I will not run as an independent if I lose the primary.' He told me there was no way he would do that. I felt betrayed."

I asked Jim about the phone call.

"One of his staffers called me shortly before the convention and asked if Senator Lieberman could speak to me. I was sort of honored that the Senator wanted to talk to me, so I said 'Sure thing.'"

"Joe Lieberman then called and asked for my support at the convention. I told him that I was very much against the war in Iraq, and asked him if we, as a nation, had the choice of what to spend these billions of tax dollars on, what would it be? Maybe a cure for cancer, or ending world hunger? Nobody in their right mind would choose to perpetrate this war."

"Lieberman then said that Hussein was a terrible and ruthless leader who needed to be removed to ensure peace. He also said that we'd start withdrawing troops from Iraq shortly, and we'd be under 100,000 soldiers by Christmas."

"I said that I'd read in the paper that he would run as an independent if he lost the primary, and Joe said, 'No Jim, I will not run as an independent. That was something a Lamont supporter goaded me into saying.'"

Jim said that Lieberman called a second time before the convention trying to get his support. Needless to say, Jim Quish is a thinking Democrat, and he voted for the man he thought would work to stop the insanity in our Federal Government. Ned Lamont.

"No Jim, I will not run as an independent. That was something a Lamont supporter goaded me into saying."

Even BEFORE the Convention, everything was Ned Lamont's fault.

Joe Lieberman is a Liar. How can anyone in Connecticut vote for this man?

Ned Lamont on the Debates

Tonight Ned Lamont made an appearance at the Branford DTC, along with 3rd Congressional District Representative Rosa DeLauro, in a "Meet & Greet" that was well-stocked with pizzas and Democrats.

The Kiss Float put in an appearance, displaying Joe's shame as the $387,000 flies out of his bag of petty cash, completely unhindered by ethics or election laws.

Here's Ned answering a couple of my questions about the debates immediately after the meeting. Bonus points if you can if you can hear the point where I'm trying not to laugh as I ask a question.



(Hint: the real answer was "You goddamn sonovabitch", but Ned is way too classy to repeat that out loud.)

Where's the money, Joe?

Nobody in the media is doing their job and asking this question.

Spazeboy is.



Visit Spazeboy.net and let him know you agree with him that Joe must answer the question.

Tivo alert: Ned answers faith-based questions

Shane Griffith's interview of Ned Lamont at the Milford Democratic Party's Meet & Greet on Tuesday will be broadcast on Crossroads Magazine special on the three U.S. Senate candidates. Here's the press release:

CROSSROADS MAGAZINE TO FEATURE PROGRAM ON U.S. SENATE CANDIDATES

Meet the Candidates: Sen. Joe Lieberman, Ned Lamont and Alan Schlesinger.

The Office of Radio and Television of the Archdiocese of Harford has put together a special edition of “Crossroads Magazine” featuring the three primary candidates running for U.S. Senator. The extended segment will air on Crossroads throughout Connecticut three times next week beginning on:

Saturday, Oct. 28 at 10:30 p.m. on WCTX MyTV Channel 9
Sunday, Oct. 29 at 10:30 a.m. on WTXX the CW Channel 20
Wednesday, Nov. 1 at 5:30 a.m. on WTXX the CW Channel 20

The program features each candidate answering the same questions regarding faith in politics, women’s reproductive rights, their definition of marriage, and their strategies to combat our nation’s and Connecticut’s healthcare crisis. The purpose is to provide voters with information not commonly covered by the mainstream media, and to help them vote with a clear and informed conscience. We’ve put forth extra effort to be as fair and balanced as possible.

I posted Ned's responses to those questions last week, and now you can see all three candidates answer these questions from a faith-based point of view.

"We're # 49! We're # 49!"

C'mon everybody, if we all try REAL HARD and reelect Joe Lieberman, we can make NUMBER FIFTY!


(video by by Brian Felsen and Stefan Avalos)

Don't forget Joe's blog!

I've been working hard to keep up with all the lame articles and outright lies that are posted on Joe Lieberman's official campaign blog.

You know, the one where they don't allow comments.

But I do.

Not only do I allow comments, I encourage them! With complete abandon.

So visit the Joe2006Blog.com and post YOUR thoughts on Joe's cute little bundles of lies.

Lamont Accepts Invitation for Fourth Debate

This just in from the Lamont campaign:

(STATEWIDE) – Today, Democratic Nominee for US Senate Ned Lamont accepted an invitation to attend another US Senate debate. It will be held next Thursday evening, November 2nd, and will be sponsored by Fox 61 WTIC-TV and the Hartford Courant. The debate will be broadcast live from Quinnipiac College in Hamden, and again several times before the election on November 7th.

“We are looking forward to another opportunity to debate the issues openly so the voters of Connecticut can make an informed decision on who they want to represent them in the US Senate,” said Liz Dupont-Diehl, Communications Director for the Lamont Campaign. “We hope that both of Ned’s opponents will join him.”

Republican Nominee Alan Schlesinger has also accepted the invitation. The sponsors will allow the debate to proceed whether or not Senator Lieberman accepts.

The Establishment is Scared to Death

They are afraid. Very afraid. The leaders of the Incumbent Protection Racket in Washington, DC are terrified that we, the people, can actually have a voice in our government. Ned and those of us supporting him, wanting to kick the bums out, have the old timers in an uproar. Yes, Ned is the Democratic nominee, a right he won in a Democratic primary, but Chuck Schumer, head of the DSCC has been totally absent in this race -- where is all the money for this competitive race? Flowing into Joe Lieberman's coffers.

Why is Joe getting all of this support? Because he's already a member of the club. He is in deep with the lobbyists and special interests that control Washington. He can be relied on to vote the way he is "supposed to" vote. Put Connecticut's needs first? No way. Joe has folded on the energy bill, the Iraq mess, and he voted to give George W Bush the absolute right to determine what torture is and is not, and who can be treated as an "enemy combatant" and who cannot. (But, remember, if Hillary becomes president, she'll have the same powers to declare Rush an "enemy combatant," so maybe we just have to hang on for 2 years -- heh, heh.)

No, we are the establishment's worst nightmare. We think, we donate, we're active, we're incredibly well informed, and we call them on their bullshit, like claiming they have never said "Stay the Course." WE have become the checks and balances in this era of a Rubber-Stamp Congress.

That's why they want to crush us. The primary win was bad enough for these insiders -- a seat in the Senate held by a man with a conscience, who's there for US, who can't be bought --- well, that's a fate too horrible for those entrenched in the power game to even contemplate.

We, in Connecticut, for the first time in a LONG time, have the power to change politics as they know it. At this point, it is not about your money. It is about your voice and your presence. Come to the town hall meetings with Ned and bring your friends. Send postcards to friends and family. If you click, you'll see Bob's video on how much fun it is to get involved with this campaign down the stretch. If you can take election day off and volunteer to drive people to the polls, make last minute calls, monitor polling places -- you can change our world.

The last revolution started in Massachusetts. Let the next one start here in our beloved CT on November 7. Ned Lamont -- his ONLY special interest is Connecticut.

The Media is Lazy and Dumb

I've been resisting this thought for weeks now, but I just can't prevent it from entering my mind and spilling out all over my keyboard.

The Media is Lazy and Dumb

First, let me discuss how I came to this conclusion.

I've never been involved in a campaign before. At least, not with anywhere NEAR the total immersion I've experienced over the last six months. This is an entirely new experience to me.

In many ways, it's been an eye-opener. I'm continually amazed at the things I see, hear, and feel while I'm out there making my videos, talking to people, and observing the process.

Senators give answers about things that are not only wrong, but agressively so. The ego of a sitting US Senator is a terrible and awesome thing. Politicians talk like John Gotti and Tony Soprano. Campaign staffers routinely lie as a matter of course; they lie when they don't even HAVE to, simply out of habit.

And the Media...well, as I said, they're Lazy and Dumb.

How else can you explain the way they simply transcribe what a candidate says without challenging him on the most basic inaccuracies? Or the way they draw conclusions that are not only erroneous, but are facing 180 degrees from the truth?

Or the way the Media completely ignores the fact that Joe Lieberman apparently has a slush fund of over a third of a million dollars, and nobody is asking about it?

$387,000. That's MORE MONEY than Nixon's Watergate bugging team was funded with!

Yet, for some reason, the media doesn't think this is a significant issue. Amazing.

Well, it's disappointing. I used to think that the Media was a sort of noble profession. Guys like the famous Watergate-cracking team of Woodward and Bernstein. People who would stay up late, digging through the tangle of clues, relentlessly search for the underlying truth that will expose the guilty and exonerate the innocent.

But now, the Media seems to consist of nothing but transcribers, politically-motivated spinners, and self-aggrandizing boors. It's the perfect career path for the Lazy and the Dumb. The only qualifications you need apparently is a basic mastery of grammar and spelling, and a willingness to allow egregious acts of public betrayal to occur right under your nose without making any effort to rectify them.

The Lieberman Slush Fund is potentially a Pulitzer-worthy story for a motivated journalist, but it's been out for over a week now and none of our Media hotshots have even bothered calling Tammy Sun out on her promise to release the detailed accounting of the missing loot last Monday. They're letting the story slide through their lazy and dumb fingers.

But Mark Davis did a wonderful job of looking smug while asking Ned Lamont about his advertising during the debate. Because what's apparently important is being a smart-ass and taking shots at the honest candidates while letting the criminal ones slide by. Because what counts is how clever you look on TV, not the basic TRUTH of the issues.

I can only do so much. I was the only person at the debate who dared ask Lieberman about his slush fund, while all the other Media simply asked the same, tired and lame questions that Joe has heard and responded to a million times. Or maybe it was only a THIRD of a million times. It doesn't matter.

What matters is this - until the Media takes some initiative and starts digging for the news instead of simply calling it in, we'll be stuck with bad government and this inevitable conclusion:

The Media is Lazy and Dumb

Joe avoids the question (as usual)

When asked repeatedly about how the war in Iraq is going, Senator "Doubletalk" comes out with complex, nonsensical, multi-point answers designed to confuse the public and to avoid admitting what we all know:

"The war in Iraq is a continuing disaster for America"


This is a perfect example of WHY we need to retire Joe on November 7th:

He doesn't have the honesty to answer a simple YES OR NO question!

Click here to help

There's five BIG races here in CT, and a bunch of smaller ones.

And they're ALL gonna be a horse race to the finish!

Here's some info on the BIG ones, courtesy of ConnecticutBLOG:

To help John DeStefano click here

To help Ned Lamont click here

To help Chris Murphy click here

To help Diane Farrell click here

To help Joe Courtney click here

You can make a difference.

If you want to help the state races, check into your local area's political scene and get involved.

Joe and George - 2 of a kind

There is a witty little catch phrase that the President came up with after the invasion of Iraq, and Joe Lieberman has taken that phrase and made it a major part of his platform on the war.

See if you can count how many times the phrase is mentioned here:



The when you're done, think about how much time you can volunteer to help Ned Lamont CHANGE THE COURSE!

Then CLICK HERE to find out where you can help.

200,000

We've had a minor milestone here at Connecticut Bob.

Last night our website visit total hit the 200,000 mark. Wow!

I started this silly little blog back in April after Joyce and I saw Ned speak at the now-legendary Naples Pizza appearance. (CT Blogger still has the video of that night, and a short clip appeared in a Lamont commercial recently)

Walking back to our car after that appearance and speaking to Ned, we both decided we were going to support his campaign.

Little did I know where it was going to lead!

So here we are today, with a blog that people seem to enjoy. I've got an amazing blogging partner in Kirby, who adds a lot here, and I've got a ton of new friends because of this.

And hopefully, in roughly two weeks time, we'll have a new senator to celebrate with.

That would make all this work seem very worthwhile. And, finally...

Thank you for visiting!

Joe's new ad forgot a minor point

Joe Lieberman's continued use of Karl Rove's tactics in his TV ads is astounding.

"Blame the other guy for stuff I'm doing myself" seems to be the overriding theme here.

In his latest crap-tossing-fest, our junior Senator alleges that Ned Lamont's family fortune has "up to $5 million invested" in a "firm whose companies ship jobs overseas."

Maybe like Halliburton, of which Joe Lieberman himself had quite a few shares until he embarrassed himself by pointing out Ned's much smaller investment and then Joe had to divest himself of it.

Yeah, Joe caught himself with that allegation.

Or the contributions he accepted from Wal-Mart and meekly claimed that he returned so he could posture at the "Wake Up Wal-Mart" rally in Bridgeport this summer.

So, let's talk about investing in American jobs.

Joe voted in favor of NAFTA. That's the North American Free Trade Agreement.

According to the Economic Policy Institute (link):

Since the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) was signed in 1993, the rise in the U.S. trade deficit with Canada and Mexico through 2002 has caused the displacement of production that supported 879,280 U.S. jobs. Most of those lost jobs were high-wage positions in manufacturing industries.

And the report also had THIS to say about the results of Joe Lieberman's support of NAFTA:

The loss of these jobs is just the most visible tip of NAFTA's impact on the U.S. economy.

So, while Joe Lieberman is picking through the investments of an estimated $300 million family fortune that has CREATED wealth and jobs, his vote for NAFTA has cost us almost a MILLION JOBS.

Thanks for caring, Joe.

Join the team and help Ned win!

It's getting down to crunch time for our state and our nation. Ned Lamont needs YOUR help to get over the top and WIN for YOU!

Here's what you do:

1) Watch the video
2) Decide how much time you can give (anything is helpful!)
3) Contact a Lamont office and ask them how you can help

OK, are you ready? Let's go!

1) Watch the video:



2) Decide how MUCH time you have: A few hours in the morning, or evening; maybe a full day on the weekend; a morning or an afternoon session; whatever you can spare!

3) Contact a campaign office that's close to you: And tell 'em that Connecticut Bob sent you!

Volunteer Coordinator: Rose Ryan, (203) 634-6601

1st Congressional District
1stcd@nedlamont.com

West Hartford Office
901 Farmington Ave
West Hartford, CT 06119
(860) 523-9238

Hartford Office
1339 Albany Avenue
Hartford, CT 06112
(860) 548-1823

East Hartford Office
1003 Main Street
East Hartford, CT 06108
(860) 291-9527

2nd Congressional District
2ndcd@nedlamont.com

New London Office
154 Hempstead St
New London, CT 06320
(860) 447-3585

Willimantic Office
713 Main St
Willimantic, CT 06226
(860) 456-1316

(Satellite phonebanking locations in Groton, Norwich, Old Saybrook, Mansfield, and Vernon.)

3rd Congressional District
3rdcd@nedlamont.com

New Haven Office
205 Church St., Suite 501
New Haven, CT 06510
(203) 772-2405

(Satellite phonebanking locations in Branford, Hamden, and Milford.)

4th Congressional District
4thcd@nedlamont.com

Norwalk Office
25 Van Zant St
Suite 18D
Norwalk, CT 06855
(203) 854 5219

Bridgeport Office
300 Fairfield Avenue
Bridgeport, CT 06604
(203) 331-9869

(Satellite phonebanking locations in Greenwich, Stamford, and Fairfield.)

5th Congressional District
5thcd@nedlamont.com

Watertown Office
659 Main St.
Watertown, CT 06795
(860) 274-4957

Help me make a video!

This is YOUR chance to be involved in the making of a Connecticut Bob Video!

I'm thinking of putting together a video this week about the impact of the Iraq War felt here at home in Connecticut.

If you, a member of your family, or someone you know is serving/has served in Iraq, I am looking for home movies with family (the cute stuff) and/or movies from abroad while serving overseas.

This goes for digital photos and snapshots as well.

The plan is to compile it into a video that shows just what people are leaving behind at home, and the contrast to war while in Iraq.

Time is critical here, I'd like to get moving on it ASAP. Email me at futuredv at yahoo and let me know what you have and how I can get in touch with you, and later this week I'll start compiling your videos/movies/pictures.

I really want to do this, but I'll need YOUR help fast!

"Impressions of the Debate"

Here's my magnum opus on last night's debate. The video is about 10 minutes long and shows a lot of little scenes from outside and inside the debate, including some samizdat video of the end of the debate.

I wasn't too worried about taking video in the theater after I saw how ineffective they were in throwing those LaRouche assholes out of the place. They are featured in the video afterwards, singing like they did inside. Dopes.

Most of the camera work is shaky because I was talking on the cell phone most of the time to Kirby back at "Connecticut Bob Central".

By the way, great job last night, Kirby! Well done.

Some images from last night

While my ten-minute video opus on the debate is being rendered and uploaded to Youtube, here's some pictures I took last night to tide you over:

Here's the marquis of the Garde Arts Center. Because of Joe Lieberman's support of the Bush/Cheney Energy Bill, they couldn't afford to light the middle of the sign.

"You goddamn sonovabitch!"

The Puppetmaster-In-Chief shows who pulls the stings in the Connecticut For Lieberman Party.

"You goddamn sonovabitch!"

Here's the three reporters who managed to craft the most boring questions I've ever heard.


"You three goddamn sonsabitches!"

The Garde Arts Theater is a magnificently restored theater, and here's Connecticut Joyce with legendary actor Humphrey Bogart.

I think I may have heard Joe Lieberman say to Bogie, "You goddamn dead sonovabitch!" but I'm not 100% sure.

Poor Joe...the man simply doesn't possess ANY class.

(Disclaimer: for all I know, Joe may have been saying "You got some classy britches" to Ned)

Joe: No Longer a Dem

UPDATE: Yes, I know that I screwed up and wrote "The" instead of "Then" in the video. Don't bother filling my comments with corrections. I'm not gonna change it. If Joe can call other candidates "goddamn sonovabitches", then I can leave my misprint in the video.

(How's THAT for a left-handed justification while getting a shot in at Joe? Brilliant!)

I'm a champion! ("Eagle-eye Smith" reference)

Back from New London

And boy, am I tired!

Here's a Tim Tagaris photo (via MY batteries, which he bummed off of me at the cost of me taking pictures with my own digital camera!) of the Lamont crowd moments before our triumphant march to the theater. The surly Irishman in the lower left is Tom Swan (who isn't surly at all, but just looks that way when he smells blood), and Ned Lamont is just above him, shaking hands and greeting his supporters. My buddy Sal is visible at lower right, and that's a cardboard cutout of George W. Bush on the pole being Joe Lieberman's puppetmaster.

It was a real hoot tonight, from our very first view of the new and improved Kiss Float; to the very last sip of IPA Ale that I enjoyed at the bar moments after meeting the legend Bill Hillsman himself in person!

Joyce and I just dropped off the amazing Caffinated Geek Girl from Connecticut Local Politics (Genghis Conn has got a lot of great pictures from the debate posted there) and we caught the last 10 minutes of the late CSPAN rebroadcast, and it came across almost as crazy as it was for us who were there.

I sat with Branford Boy (and his lovely wife Sally, who's clearly much too good for him!) and it was a lot like being at a good football game when the home team is winning. Hoots and cheers went up mostly for Ned, and despite the party-fucking-pooping Lyndon LaRouche tards who showed up to sing badly at Joe, it was a fun time.

Tomorrow I'll have video of the post-debate Joe taking questions from the (lazy, transcribing, do-nothing) press while giving me the stink-eye, and rushing off before my volley of polite yet intriguing questions were fired at him. Plus some other cool stuff. And I had a moment to speak to Alan Schlesinger post-debate, who was open and accessable as always.

But that will be tomorrow.

(And somebody, please, just tell me when exactly was it that George Stephanopolis had the stick surgically implanted into his ass?)

Post Debate Report 1

The singing that disrupted Joe's speeches was from the Lyndon LaRouche people, who are now standing in the lobby of the theatre, singing and holding a sign equating Bush and Lieberman with Goebbels and Himmler. Bob shot video and will have it up later. If you did not get a chance to watch live, be sure to catch a stream or watch C-SPAN at 11pm. The second half is not to be missed.

Joe called Ned a liar, and Ned stood up to him and defended himself in a very classy way. Last quick question was about gays in the military, "don't ask, don't tell" -- wish Ned and Alan would say that's Joe's policy with the slush fund. Not one word about that, or the new BS from Tammy Sun, "We'll release our petty cash log when Ned releases his tax returns" Oh yeah, right....Joe's delivered on every promise so far in this campaign. Why don't we set up a records escrow? Ned can put his tax returns in, to show good faith, but they are only made public when Joe's full petty cash accounting is also submitted to a special master.

If I hear Joe whine one more time, I think I will puke.

Ned and Al said they would like to barnstorm the state, continuing debates, with questions from the public in each congressional district. Joe declined.

There will be plenty of analysis on this one, that's for sure. Bob is going to have amazing video.

First Debate Report

The debate will be on C-SPAN tonight at 11p Eastern. Live stream at 8p Eastern and audio stream live at 8pm. (you might want to log in and fill out their stupid form in advance).

I just got the first report from Bob, and it is all about the money is pre-debate festivities in New London. Joe's people were right in front of the theatre, about 20 people, many in suits, no Lieberyouth to be seen, and about 15 firefighters with the IAFF, who endorsed Joe. Alan has about 20 people in front of the theatre. Then there's the Lamont Blob.

Bob estimates there are between 300 and 400 Ned supporters. They gathered about a block away because there are so many people there, and then, led by a police escort, then bagpipes, they marched to the front of the theatre with the KISS float bringing up the end of the party. Ned's people are handing out DVDs of the 1988 Lieberman tribute -- and the Lieberfolks just dumped them in the trash.

The KISS float is updated with a pot of money labeled "Petty Cash" and a sign that says "Is this Joe Lieberman's idea of 'Team Connecticut'?" I can't wait to see the video Bob is shooting as I type. A new sign on the back says "The kiss - stick with Joe and you're stuck with Bush"

It sounded pretty rowdy in the background as I was talking to Bob. Wish I was there! While you wait, visit Colin McEnroe's show and listen to interviews he did with Tom Swan (campaign mgr), George Stephanopoulous (tonight's moderator) and Eunice Groark, (campaign co-chair), former Republican who served as Lt.Governor with Lowell Weicker as governor when they ran under "A Connecticut Party"

Debate time!

"Has anyone seen my $387,000 anywhere?"

Poor Joe...having to worry about all the money he lost. I guess when you rake in $15,000,000.00 from lobbyists and big corporations, it's easy to misplace a few hundred grand. That's small potatoes to a big-bucks politician like Joe.

I wonder if anyone will ask him about it tonight?

Stay tuned for updates and commentary from Kirby while I'm at the debate. I'll have my video camera, and will be there for the pre- and post-debate festivities. I'll try to call in with details before and after.

Watch the debate tonight. 8:00PM on WTNH-TV Channel 8 (also streamed here live at WTNH.COM). Also, WTIC NewsTalk 1080 and WTIC.com will carry the audio portion live.

ROFL

C.R.E.E.L.

From the Daily Cup of Joe on the Ned Lamont official website:

After President Richard Nixon abused campaign finance law through his Committee to Reelect the President (CREEP), laws were passed to force candidates to disclose how they spend campaign funds.

But over the weekend, it became clear Senator Joe Lieberman may be ignoring those laws, as the Senator’s FEC reports uncovered $387,000 “petty cash” slush fund that could be called the "Committee to Reelect Lieberman" (CREEL).

During the 14 days around the August 8th primary, Lieberman’s campaign spent over $387,000 on un-itemized, un-identified, and un-disclosed disbursements. By contrast, Ned Lamont’s campaign spent just $500 on petty cash in the entire reporting period. This slush fund requires answers to questions like: what was this spent on? Who was it spent on? And why weren’t the expenses itemized, as the FEC requires?

Today, the Lamont campaign will be filing a formal complaint with the Federal Election Commission, demanding an investigation into possible wrongdoing.

Read the rest of the article here.

I wonder how much of that money went to Lobbyist Richard Goodstein (see Dickie in action here). Judging from how he behaved, it must have been a LOT!

(photo courtesy CT Blogger at ConnecticutBLOG)

Joe volunteers ask "Where's MY piece of the pie?"

$387,000 to pay "volunteers".

Yeah, THAT makes sense!

I wonder how many of those "volunteers" are feeling like complete dupes this morning, because they missed out on Joe's gravy train? It's obvious that the money DIDN'T go to the loyal Lieber-troops who were out there in the trenches, knocking themselves out for Joe. Working for the guy that they misguidedly thought was honest and respectable.

No, the money went elsewhere.

That's gotta hurt. Not only was their hero caught in a scandal that will likely lose him the election, but they didn't get a tasty piece of that big ol' pie that Joe was handing out. They were passed over and left out in the cold.

A lot of Lieberman workers must be giving their boss a cold hard reappraisal this morning.

A third of a million dollars worth of reappraisals.

Watch the debate tonight. 8:00PM on WTNH-TV Channel 8 (also streamed here live at WTNH.COM). Also, WTIC NewsTalk 1080 and WTIC.com will carry the audio portion live.

Something tells me there's going to be fireworks.

Ned and Joe Comparison Sheets

Want to learn exactly how Ned Lamont and Joe Lieberman differ on issues that are important to YOU?

Check out this great comparison sheet that is now available online. Unofficial, but it's representative of the type of initiative that volunteers and supporters have taken for months now.

Leave comments on how you like the comparison sheet. Ways to improve it, add to it, etc.

Then keep it going by inviting friends, family, and neighbors to send out some FREE Ned Lamont postcards!

Voter registration deadline almost here!

From Spazeboy.net:

I find it hard to believe that regular readers of the local political blogs in CT are not registered to vote, but if family, friends and neighbors are not, their registrations must be hand-delivered or post-marked by October 24. Update: The deadline to register in person is 10/31

If you’re not registered, or if you know someone who isn’t, download and print the voter registration form in English or Spanish. Make sure to get yours into a mailbox by last pick-up on Tuesday 10/24. If for a friend or family member, remind them to get it in the mail by last pick-up on Tuesday 10/24.

(click to read the rest of Spazeboy's article)

We registered 30,000 new Democrats approaching the primary, and Ned won by around 10,000 votes. So THAT should tell you how important it is to be registered to vote! Regardless of who you support, there's no way you should miss casting your vote because of failing to be registered.

(BTW, even though I said "regardless of who you support", remember that Joe Lieberman voted for the repeal of Constitutionally protected rights and also voted in favor of torture.

So if you want to lose your right to vote, and then get tortured for it, be sure to "Stick With Joe"! LOL!)

Is THIS a "partisan attack", Joe?

Posted on NBC News, among many other places:

BAGHDAD, Iraq -- The number of Americans killed in Iraq this month now stands at 80.

A military statement said a soldier from the 82nd Airborne Division was killed and three others were wounded Saturday in combat in a northern province.

A separate statement said a Marine was killed Saturday in Anbar province west of Baghdad.

"October is the deadliest month this year for U.S. troops in Iraq, and it's on pace to become the deadliest since November of 2004."

Senator, I'm sorry if this sounds terribly partisan to you, but could you please answer one question for me:

How many more brave Americans need to die in this senseless war for George Bush's friends?

If that makes me partisan, then fine...I can live with that.

There's 80 brave Americans this month alone who won't get to live with anything ever again because of this stupid war.

Powerful

Sometimes, with all the rhetoric and spin that gets tossed around so freely during a hotly contested election, we lose sight of what's important.

Here's a powerful reminder.


Stem cell research promises to find cures for countless diseases and afflictions. George W. Bush firmly opposes ANY public funding of stem cell research. Joe Lieberman supposedly is in favor of stem cell research, but his policy of rolling over for EVERY SINGLE item on the George W. Bush agenda belies that claim.

Almost certainly the issue will end up in front of the Supreme Court. Joe Lieberman's vote for cloture on discussion of Sam Alito's confirmation hearing is exactly the same as a vote FOR this ultra-conservative pro-Bush pro-torture pro-strip-searching-children anti-choice judge.

And can you guess on which side of the stem cell research argument Sam Alito will fall?

Ned Lamont has stated repeatedly, and as recently as last Tuesday on video (available here) exactly where he stands on issues like stem cell research.

What more do you need to know?

Where is "Joe For Progress"?

Speaking of blogs, whatever happened to that most Rovian of blogs, "Joe For Progress"?

This is the officially sanctioned "independent" Lieberman blog, the highest linked from Joe's official blog page, and known for posting the vile stuff that even Joe wouldn't dare put on his blog, has been down for "maintenance" for weeks now.

What's the matter? Did Eric Blankerbanger get a little too overwhelmed with writing the litany of lies on the regular blog that he didn't have any time left for "Joe For Progress"? Where's all that "independent blogger's support for Lieberman" that was supposed to be out there?

How come everyone in the blogosphere ISN'T rushing to help Joe Lieberman?

What does $327,000 in petty cash buy you?

Maybe it buys you somebody to do some dirty politicking, like this guy:

CORRECTION: It's $387,000; just like Joe, I somehow misplaced $50,000 in petty cash.

And how would Joe's campaign people pay this guy?

Something tells me you won't find a receipt in Joe Lieberman's campaign vault that says "$1,056 to pay racist guy who dresses like an Arab and holds up a rotten sign" on it.

No, you'd probably see something like this:

"Petty Cash" and "Stipend Volunteer Payments". Vague to the point of being completely untracable. That's what is known inside the Beltway as a "slush fund" payment.

And somebody please tell me just how in hell do you PAY VOLUNTEERS? Either they VOLUNTEER, or they're PAID STAFFERS! By definition, you can't PAY a frickin' VOLUNTEER!

Dick Nixon was very good at dirty tricks and hiding funds, but it was Karl Rove who wrote the book on them.

And I'd bet that someone in Joe Lieberman's campaign has a signed copy on their desk.

Video Roundup

Lots of good stuff in the past few days.

Looking for the now famous Amann video? Click here

Here's the interview with Alan Schlesinger

In the last 24 hours, there are two new Lamont commercials to take a look at: This one, Entrepreneur, was the first commercial aired immediately following the WFSB debate broadcast last night, then it got some rotation during game 7 of the NLCS (so sorry, Bob)

This one, with Dodd, debuted this AM. I think the end is pretty clever. What will be Dodd's punishment from Joe for this one?

Over at Spazeboy, the doctor is in

For anyone who has a teenaged girl at home, or knows one -- this video speaks to girls' (and women's) self esteem in a way words cannot possibly. (Hat tip to Colin McEnroe)

And now for the one that will really piss you off:
The Republican National Committee is trying to use fear in the most panicked way by suggesting a terrorist attack is imminent -- sound familiar? You can see it here The particularly disgusting thing about this is the end -- "These are the stakes" is right out of the Johnson daisy ad that aired only once because it was deemed so over the top.

Follow the money

For all his self-serving whining about being poor and cash-strapped, Joe Lieberman appears to be doing OK financially.

There's no better way to spend a rainy day than by thumbing through the incredibly complex and extremely interesting Lieberman Campaign Financial Report.

Oh, and don't worry about the Q-poll. They were wrong about Ned's enormous lead two weeks before the primary, and they're wrong about this. Poll director Douglas Schwartz is a publicity-seeking clown who desperately wants to impose his spin on the numbers and sound like an intelligent prognosticator.

Doug, stick to what you know...phoning lonely retirees and tabulating the results.

Anything else just makes you look like a dope.

Bummer

Well, at least it was an exciting run!

And since the universe mostly works in fairly predictable ways, this means that Ned will definitely win in November.

Because, Karma can't possibly be THAT mean to me twice in three weeks!

Ned's interview at Milford Democrats on TV

Shane Griffith's interview of Ned Lamont at the Milford Democratic Party's Meet & Greet on Tuesday will be broadcast on Crossroads Magazine special on the three U.S. Senate candidates.

Crossroads airs twice weekly on Saturday nights at 10:30 on WCTX MyTV9, and Sunday mornings at 10:30 on WTXX CW20. This segment will probably air October 28 and 29.

So far Shane still hasn't gotten an interview with Joe Lieberman, but he hopes to have it in time for the show's debut. Be sure to tune in for a faith-related view of Ned on the important issues.

Paulie Walnuts ain't got nuttin' on dis guy!

I hope our House Speaker sees the humor in this cute little video, or I may have to shop around for a remote car-starter.


If anybody has the number of the Witness Protection Program, that might come in handy.

UPDATE: More here from the New Haven Register.

UPDATE from Kirby: These posts just amaze me. If you would like to see more, we have a tip jar at PayPal, just scroll up and click -- this is not for me, the mild-mannered behind-the-scenes type gal -- it's to help Bob with his technology upgrade!

CT House Speaker Amann speaks

And boy, does he speak!

I just got home from an appearance by Gov. candidate John DeStefano at the Milford RR Station, where he was joined by House Speaker James Amann to discuss transportation issues. Speaker Amann also endorsed the Democratic candidate for governor.

After the speech, I taped an interview with Speaker Amann, and was joined by a very enthusiastic CT Keith and Branford Boy; h/t to BB for giving me the heads up on this appearance; visit My Left Nutmeg for his recap. CT Keith took over the interview, and let's just say it became a very heated discussion!

I'm uploading the video to my PC right now, and I hope to have something up by 4 or 5 today.

Trust me, you'll want to see THIS!

Samizdat audio

Here's the Senate Debate audio, courtesy ConnecticutBLOG.

"Restriction of free thought and free speech is the most dangerous of all subversions. It is the one un-American act that could most easily defeat us."
-- Justice William O. Douglas

Let's hear it for Kirby!

Just so everybody knows...

...today's excellent coverage of the WFSB-3 nearly-super-secret Senate Debate was provided in it's entirety by our very own Kirby.

She was the complete "Connecticut Bob" Special Senate Debate Team today! Without her tireless efforts and determination, we never would have gotten such amazing coverage of today's event; hours before the MSM broadcast the story.

Let Kirby know how much you value her work! This is People Powered Media at it's best!

UPDATE 6:20am: Kirby here. Thanks so much. I felt like I was the eyes and ears of all bloggers yesterday. You can listen to the whole debate here, thanks to ConnecticutBlog's fine audio sweetening.

Lightning Round -- best way for homeland security to protect CT

Joe
*Just passed a bill in the Senate
*I personally added language that smaller ports like those in CT can apply for special funding
Alan
*Use expertise of government experts and large ports, such as the port of Los Angeles that has the technology
Ned
*Intercept threats before they get here
*Screen cargo bound for US before it gets here
*Work with allies to do screening all over the world

What About Social Security?

Joe answered first
*Very important question
*1 in 5 -- 160,000 seniors in CT depend on SS
*They would live in poverty without SS
*Good through 2040 -- dollars needed for benefits will match dollars coming in
*I've been working on this, but SS not enough
*I am working on legislation to protect company pensions
Al
*First, we need to repeal Congressional pensions and let these guys live under SS (loud applause)
*Joe, you're an ostrich, just like the rest of them, a member of flock
*[He said more, but consistent with Monday debate, discussing Joe's not understanding and it's all IOUs and I missed it -- sorry]
Ned
*Joe has flip-flopped on privatization
*We stand by SS and will keep it healthy financially
*[He said more, but consistent with Monday debate, and I missed it -- sorry]

Rebut
Joe
*Al and I may disagree
*IOUs in SS, yes, because of the budget deficit
*I am against privatization
*As long as God gives me life, I will fight for SS
Alan
*Joe needs to talk to the GAO and other experts in the government
*Joe's plan is IOUs from him and Al Gore in the lock box
Ned
*Fundamental changes, as Al said, are critical
*Budget problems
*Too much foreign oil -- Cheney bill increases our foreign oil dependence
*Invasion in Iraq has made us less safe, less money available




Rebut

Why don't we get more Bejamins for homeland security?

Alan (first)
*I will do everything I can
*$15 or $50 million -- to people in Washington, it's chump change anyway
*Horror stories of misappropriations for HS $ -- bought TVs for prisoners
*We must make sure $$ goes to ports
*When people drink that Kool-Aid, we lose
Ned
*We may have senority in the Senate, but we're not seeing results
*Joe missed important votes on homeland security funding
*We get less per capita than any New England state
*Alan -- that is not chump change
*2 weeks in Iraq could pay for port security
Joe
*I've been fighting for funding
*Bush admin not providing enough overall funding for HS
*I helped set up the Department of HS
*I worked with the Republicans to increase our funding
*Will do everything I can, hopefully as committee chair

Rebut
Alan
*Not chump change? You've spent that much of your own money on this campaign!
Ned
*Need to finish the job in Afghanistan
*$250 million/day in Iraq
*Imagine what we could do with that money applied to HS
*Need to work with our allies
Joe
*Ned spent so much time blaming instead of what he would do for CT
*I just passed a bill on firefighting [missed the name] with full bipartisan support, and that's why I am so proud to have teh support from firefighters for my campaign

Increase in oil prices

Joe
*This is an outrage
*Oil market does not follow supply and demand principles as it should
*I proposed excess profit tax that would be redirected to people who can't afford heating oil
*"Set America Free" bill he introduced would decrease our oil dependency by 10 million barrels
Alan
*Remember last gas/oil crisis when mortgages were also sky-high
*Gross earning tax/excess profits tax not the answer
*Reagan repealed them then, and gas prices fell dramatically
*Need change from fossil to alternative
*Two level incentive plan
Ned
*After 9/11, people were ready to do things to reduce oil dependence
*Cheney invited his friends to the WH and they decided how the energy plan would go
*Joe only New England D to vote for the energy bill
*Need incentives for conservation and for companies in alternative fuels

Rebut
Joe
*No greater failure of leadership over the last 30 years than the failure to decrease our dependence on foreign oil.
*I worked in a bipartisan way on the "Set America Free" with Senators like Obama and Sessions
Alan
*I agree with you, Ned
*Cheney energy bill not good, but because it would put a natural gas facility in Long Island Sound
Ned
*When Joe signed on to the Cheney bill, we lost the opportunity to include language that would require that vehicles be more fuel efficient

At what point should US take military action North Korea and Iran?

Ned
*We are bogged down in Iraq
*We need strong, hard negotiations directly
*North Korea most dangerous
*While we were in Iraq, North Korea and Iran moved forward with nuclear plans
*We need to work with Russia and China who have more influence with Iran
Alan
*North Korea must be handled with negotiations
*If I could answer Iran in 60 seconds, then Face the Nation would only need to be 2 minutes long!
Joe
*These nuclear weapons remind us that we live in a dangerous world
*We must stop
*Requires bipartisan approach
*We are Americans first, not Democrats or Republicans
*Each nation must know US will work with allies
*We do not want to take military action, but cannot allow selling this technology
Knibbs
*Some of us don't think of ourselves as democrats or republicans, and haven't for some time

Rebut
Ned
*Joe wants regime change
*Alan wants us to use force
*We must negotiate and exhaust those options
Joe
*I sponsored a bipartisan resolution calling for regime change in Iran
*Amajenidad wants to wipe out Israel
*He said imagine a world without the US
Alan
*If you think we can negotiate with Amajenidad, good luck
*Joe and I agree on this one thing

Where do we go from here in Iraq?

In order, unless the Q went to Alan or Ned, the order was Joe, Alan, Ned
From my written notes, not necessarily quotes

Joe:
*I've spent a lot of time with soldiers and their families
*No one wants to end this war more than I do
*Can't compromise homeland security/national security
*Cannot disrespect the sacrifice our soldiers and their families have made
*I issues a 10-point plan to get out of Iraq
Alan:
*Military has done a terrific jo
*Problem in Iraq is not military
*This is now a political problem
*We can prop up al-Maliki or use a three state solution
*Split into Shiite, Sunni, and Kurd and equally distribute country income from oil
Ned:
*3.5 years ago, Bush took us to war, and Joe Lieberman cheered him on
*We need to provide all the resources al-Maliki needs
*Quoted Colin Powell that we must change course
*Quoted UK (equivalent of SOD) troops in Iraq are exacerbating the problem
*Iraqis must stand up and fight for their own country now

Rebut
Joe
*Cannot and will not stay forever
*Iraq has a reasonable prospect to survive with our help to build a free Iraq
*Must get together across party lines
Alan
*This is what happens when you run for VP and president -- you forget about your role as a Senator -- and that is to advice and consent
Ned
*We all read Joe's [using first names to go faster, Ned did not call him Joe] editorial that said we had to stay the course

Debate Report p.2

The questions this time were more on Iraq, Iran, North Korea, homeland security than the Monday debate in Stamford.

Q.1 "Where do we go from here in Iraq?'
Q.2. At what point, with North Korea and Iran should the US take military action (nukes)
Q.3. Families in the Northeast are very concerned about the 6.3% increase in home heating oil prices -- what would you do?
Q.4. Despite CT being home to more high-value target, the state is only going to get $15mil in homeland security money, down from $50mil in 2004. How do we get more $$?
Q.5. E-mail from viewers -- the future of social security is a great concern for young people -- how would you keep it solvent?
Q.6. Last -- quick, 30 sec each -- what is the best way homeland security can protect CT?

Remember, there was an opening, each candidate got a 2-min closing statement (10 min)
Each question took a min of 7.5 min, and then there were the pauses between candidates and asking the questions, etc. that took up more time. And we got yelled at by Bob Schieffer when the whole audience cheered one of Alan's answers on Social Security. Yes -- those were the only questions.

Next, I'll post from my notes on the answers from Joe, Alan, and Ned. Mr. Knibbs and Mr. Ferrucci, I mean no disrespect -- your bloggers can post for you now, and everyone will see your work tomorrow night. I must say, though, that both were very, very well prepared, knowledgable, and answered questions directly without political doublespeak. They made us proud that they were there, taking part in the full debate.

Debate footage online!

Secret Agent Guy Matt Stoller snagged some undercover footage of the super secret WFSB Senate debate, via a NSA-surplus Taiwanese high-tech microchip wireless video camera, hidden in his bow tie.

Or he simply used his digital camera. You decide.



Thanks Matt!

And here's some post-debate interviews courtesy of Tim Tagaris of the Lamont campaign.

Debate Report

While I'm working on other things for later, I just want to start at the beginning. The C4L party, it seems, was the only one to have access to the auditorium seating before hand. And they had put "reserved" signs on some of the sheets. Fortunately, someone with offical ID came out and told the press people for the other candidates what was going on, and invited them in to reserve their own seats.

I would say maybe 100 people total. I sat in the middle, in the 4th row, with Schlesinger people on my left and Lieberman people on my right. I wanted to see it straight on. The podiums were woodgrain. Left to right were Knibbs, Ferrucci, Lieberman, Schlesinger and Lamont in a semi-circle. Interesting how Joe was right in the middle for the second debate in a row -- boy, is he lucky to draw that position! So, the dynamic was the smaller party candidates to Joe's right and Alan and Ned to his left.

Questioners were Al Terzi from WFSB, Angela Dias from WTIC-AM news, and they were seated to the candidates' right. Schieffer was to the candidates' left, with a red-yellow-green light on the front of his table. Ned was last on stage when the candidates came out -- it wasn't a "Now the candidates" or anything like that. But, Ned was the only one, when he walked out to first stand behind the podium, then walk over to Bob Schieffer and shake his hand, and then walk all the way across the stage to shake Al and Angela's hand, then return to the podium. Joe's supporters next to me an behind me were nasty about that! Oh, look at how he brown-noses, the women behind me said, and the stuffy obnoxious men in suits next to me were saying that Ned is such an amateur, that he is too naive. I thought it was polite. But, even in the auditorium, when there was no audience but each other, they had to knock Ned. Nobody else there made comments -- the people who were there got tix from the campaigns, but seemed to respect that each person there was affiliated with a candidate and there was no peanut gallery --- except for Joe's boys, who talked amongst themselves when the two smaller-party candidates spoke.

Each candidate answered the same question for one minute, then each candidate got a 30-second comment period on what the other men said. Joe went over 4 times and then when Schieffer said, "Time's up," they cut his mike while he was still talking. Alan Schlesinger always spoke after Joe. I am betting this will not be visible on TV, because I bet the shot goes straight to AS as soon as Schieffer said, "Time's up." It was really pretty comical to see Joe talking on with no amplification in the theatre.

The candidates always spoke in the same order. So, unless they started with Alan or Ned, Joe was always followed by them. It was a great advantage to the R and D candidates.

Continues...

More Debate Stuff

Images by Matt Stoller of MyDD.com.

Kirby (and an unidentified man) talks to Republican candidate Alan Schlesinger today.

The KISS Float rolls again. Jon Kantrowitz arranged to bring the iconic float to the debate, and it was a big hit.

Schlesinger again was the most dynamic of the candidates, attracting plenty of attention afterwards.

Kirby covers the Senate Debate today!

I just got off the cell phone with Kirby, who was in the very exclusive audience for the WFSB-3 Senate Debate today, and she's going to post a detailed report later tonight, possibly as early as 7PM EDT.

She said that all five balloted candidates were there, Democrat Ned Lamont, Republican Alan Schlesinger, Green Party candidate Ralph Ferrucci,Concerned Citizens Party candidate Timothy Knibbs, and Connecticut For Lieberman Party candidate Senator Joe Lieberman.

Kirby said there were maybe 150 people there, and even though WFSB relented their embargo on reporters, they resolutely forbid any use of cameras or recording equipment. Of course, Kirby took copious notes, and also may have accidently left her digital recorder turned on while it was in the pocket of her blazer.

I'm sure she's very sorry about that. And that she'll be very careful not to transcribe and post any of the important bits.

Kirby mentioned Lieberman's reluctance to directly answer the questions posed to him, and in fact after he "speechified" his third response in a row, Bob Scheiffer turned off his mic in mid-speech.

The other four candidates were resolutely against the war, but Lieberman stayed his course with his "stay-the-course" strategy.

Kirby also briefly interviewed Alan Schlesinger after the event, and there may be more info added to this post as things develop. Stay tuned and check back frequently.

Ned Lamont on the issue of Faith

Earlier this evening Ned appeared at the Milford Democrats meeting. There was a big and enthusiastic crowd there, among them my father.

I was kind of surprised that so many people came up to me and said, "You're Connecticut Bob! I love your blog!" Wow, that is amazing! I made sure to tell as many people possible that it's a team effort, with Kirby doing some amazing reporting, along with all the people who submit information via the comments or email. I'm starting to feel like a celebrity!

Of course, I grabbed a handful of KISS buttons from DeanFan and everyone was clamoring for them, so that might have had something to do with my instant celebrity.

Ned saw me after his speech and said "Hi, Connecticut Bob!", and I introduced him to my father with, "Ned, please say hello to Connecticut Dad!". He said some really nice things about me, which made me feel proud.

Ned spoke and frequently had to pause for the crowd to applaud. Ned spoke for about 20 minutes, and afterwards he spent about a half hour meeting and talking with the people. Then he sat for an interview with Shane B. Griffith, from the religious network Office of Radio & Television. They broadcast a show on the CW network on the weekends, but I didn't remember the broadcast times. Email Shane to get info on when the show will be aired at griffiths at ortv-hartford dot org.

So I edited the several questions into a short 4:00 video, because so few of the media asks faith related questions. I didn't have a mic for Shane, so I transcribed and edited his questions for the title cards. I hope you don't mind that I hijacked your interview Shane (and even if he does, he's a Christian; so he HAS to forgive me! LOL!)



And to everyone I met tonight at the Democratic meeting, thanks for the warm welcome!

This Cannot Stand -- Local Media Can't Cover Debate

This from the Hartford Courant this AM, regarding the next Senate debate:

The Hartford CBS affiliate has banned representatives of the news media - other than its own - from Wednesday's 3 p.m. taping of the debate that is to be moderated by national CBS newsman Bob Schieffer before an audience of specially invited guests at The Bushnell Center for the Performing Arts.

After a news blackout of 27 hours, WFSB plans to show the canned one-hour event Thursday at 7 p.m.

"We're renting the hall, it's our debate, and we'll invite who we want to invite" - that was Channel 3's position, as paraphrased by Richard Foley, campaign manager for Republican candidate Alan Schlesinger. Polls show Schlesinger running a distant third in the race, and so, Foley said, "we feel that we cannot make too many demands."

He noted that the full day's delay would enable any candidate who had "a Gerald Ford moment" - a reference to Ford's notorious 1976 misstatement that Poland was not Soviet-dominated - to cook up a face-saving explanation even before his gaffe goes on the air Thursday. "You could be un-spinning it ... before you even spin it."

I am available and was planning to cover the debate. Time to let WFSB know what you think of their ban on local media:
Here you can e-mail questions for the debate
The contact page for the station

Caption Contest #1

Post your caption to this photo of Joe Lieberman's reaction to something Alan Schlesinger said.

(Photo via CT Blogger at ConnecticutBLOG)

Caption Contest #2

Post your caption for this photo of Lieberman Spokesmodel Dan Gerstain watching his hero get smoked at the debate!

(Photo via CT Blogger at ConnecticutBLOG)

Billboard up in CT Today

This billboard went up today on I-95. Sponsored by an interfaith group here in CT -- their Web site has a nice summary of how Joe's vote in the Senate legalized torture. Bravo that people of faith in CT are speaking out.

And ye of little faith -- everybody has advice for how the Lamont campaign should be run. Hang on a couple of more days until Joe's full 3rd quarter disclosure forms are out -- that will be quite a read.

Lieberman attacks Ned; ignores Alan

Fun debate today. Here's some observations:

Did anyone else notice how Joe Lieberman started the debate with a charge that Lamont was going to attack him BEFORE Ned even opened his mouth?

Did that strike you as kind of...strange? Like, he's trying SO HARD to prove his agenda that Lamont is a negative campaigner that Joe preemptively attacked Ned? Really odd.

And then tonight I went to the joe2006 blog...hey, that's what I'm paid for (...well, I WOULD be paid for it if I did this for money) and saw the latest entry in that wonderful and entertaining blog.

The thing that seemed a little funny was this...if you'd missed the debate and only happened to read Joe's account of it, you wouldn't have even KNOWN that Alan Schlesinger was there!

Yeah, Alan "The Lieber-beater" Schlesinger apparently escaped Joe's blogmeister's notice. Must'a slipped through the cracks.

So, if you only get your news from joe2006, you'd see that Alan Schlesinger was nowhere to be found, and that Joe somehow overcame his dismal performance against Ned and WON THE DEBATE!

Yeah, well, we all know that joe2006 is "Fantasyland". And a magical land it is, where Joe reigns supreme and Free Speech is outlawed. Paradise, it is, for Joe.

But if you want some REAL Free Speech, drop by the Joe 2006 Blog page I set up, and comment freely on Lieberman's escape from reality.

Because unlike Joe Lieberman, I'm a big fan of the Constitution, and I think it's a good idea to dust it off and take it out for a spin every once in a while.

Lessons Learned Behind the Scenes

If I drank a lot, I would be under the table by now. What a day it was! Very interesting from a number of angles.

1. The media decides what the story will be in advance.. I know this is no newsflash, but I really was surprised at how conspiratorial the national media is -- throughout the place today. This is the Lamont-Lieberman race, and they don't want to have to deal with a third candidate -- (whaah -- too much work! We have the Ned/Joe story down pat). The initial reaction was to dismiss Alan as a cartoon -- they were doing the same thing that was done to Dean. Tomorrow's morning papers will be the most interesting -- to see if as they talked to more people, and realized that Alan scored the most points.

2. Joe Blows. The Lamont rally owned the front of the hotel. There was one gal with a Schlesinger sign. Alan walked in the front way -- proudly (see nbc30.com if you can find Monahan's story from the 6pm) Joe slinked in the back door -- he couldn't have missed the kiss float, but didn't have the guts to walk in the front door. Metaphorical, isn't it?

3. Joe's scared. Immediately afterward, when the media was swarming Ned and Al-mentum, Joe came running up the back stairs. Those were the stairs between the press room where I was perched and the ballroom, and the doors were propped open for the TV wiring. There were heated voices in the staircase between Joe and "his people" on the way up. I didn't have video to catch him on the stairs, and as if by providence, Spazeboy appeared, and I told him Joe had just gone up the stairs. After just a few minutes, they came barreling back down the stairs (maybe Joe needed the little boy's room in their rented room upstairs? Who the hell knows. He has to take 6 people to the bathroom?) As Spazeboy said -- what was amazing is that Joe beat it out of the ballroom and actually left the cameras! Joe was clearly annoyed that we caught him == yet again. He got blindsided and it showed. And Joe didn't like it one bit.

4. When Connecticut Progressive Bloggers work together, amazing things happen.. I've said it before, there is no better group: Spazeboy, Caffeinated Geek Girl, CTBlogger got it done today. In fact, I was driving home while Spazeboy was working on the staircase video in the passenger seat -- with his wireless access and power adapter plugged in while I drove. Not to mention DeanFan84 and CTKeith who ushered in the return of the KISS float.

5. Polls in this race are worthless. There is no way Alan is in single digits, when internal polling shows 20% of likely voters plan to vote straight-line Republican. I said it before, and I will keep saying it -- Joe is ahead by name recognition. A lot of people are not paying attention, and it will not dawn on them until they get in the booth and see Ned on the D line and Alan on the R line.

6. Ned is Ned.And bottom line, that's why we love him. No, he's not the polished pol who makes it all look as easy as water falling off a duck's back. He is not going to change in the next 3 weeks, but the good news is we're not getting the Joe patented bait-and-switch either. Ned is so very personable one-on-one -- he made his points, and jumped on Joe in his Ned way. Now is not the time to become disillusioned.

7. Local news is waking up. All 4 stories I saw tonight on the network affiliates were fair and balanced and not the suck-ups to Lieberman they usually are. Maybe they finally smell the blood in the water.

Who knows what will happen in the next 3 weeks? Who thought we would be here with this Republican circular firing squad of the last month?

Keep the faith.

Spazeboy asks Joe "The Question"

This is the quintessential "Joe" moment!

Being faced with a video camera and not having a squad of paid handlers there to control the situation is Joe's nightmare. Spazeboy took the initiative and had his question loaded and ready to fire when the moment was right.

“Would you unequivocally caucus with the Democrats?”

Watching Joe scurrying like a crab down the stairs, trying to escape the harsh glare of reality, I almost expected him to pull his coat over his head like a Mafia "don" leaving court after a hearing. Surreal.

The reviews are coming in!

And they look great for Ned!

Here's an ABC News commentary on the debate:

"I'm running against a career politician who says, 'Stay the course,'" said Lamont, echoing the anti-war mantra that propelled him to victory in the August primary. "It's time for us now to redeploy our forces."

Trailing in the polls, Lamont hit back at Lieberman's charge that he's a running a negative campaign.

"It's not negative to say we've got to change course in Iraq," Lamont said.

And Paul Bass of the New Haven Independent had this to say about Alan Schlesinger:

The ghost of Crazy Eddie was channeled Monday by a man who would be Connecticut's next senator -- and whose name is neither Lieberman nor Lamont.

[...]

So Schlesinger came out swinging -- literally, with his hands at times -- when he finally got to debate his two opponents in a televised debate. He injected a new factor into the race. Lieberman sought to focus attention, and criticism, on Lamont, his closest rival. But Schlesinger pounced on them both throughout the debate, and sought to establish himself as the conservative alternative to two "liberal Democrats."

Kiss float is back! And Kirby rocks the Toobz!

Click for larger image
What a day! Not only did our very own Kirby do an awesome job live-blogging the debate, but the Kiss Float is back on the road (not a moment too soon, either!) Here's Spazeboy with Joe Lieberman's favorite parade float.

And afterwards, Joe Lieberman was seen fleeing the debate so fast, his car wasn't parked long enough in the handicapped spot to get a ticket! So it wasn't a total disaster for him.

Ned handled himself well in the face of Joe's repeated attacks, and when Joe's time ran out, he was given carte blanche.

(Does "Carte Blanche" even exist anymore? I think I may have to update my metaphors. Hmmm..."Ned was given a Diner's Club card"?...nope, that doesn't work either...)

Kirby rocked the intertoobz today with her amazing work. Please give her some props in the comments section!

Recap part 2

Overall, I think Schlesinger helped himself the most -- by getting fair time to talk and present himself to his Republican constituents. I think he will get a big bump out of this one.

Ned was fine. Ned is who he is, he stayed on message and was sensible.

Joe was the usual Joe.

For local spin
http://www.wvit.com (NBC)
http://www.wfsb.com (CBS) -- host of the Wed/Th debate (taped Wed, airs TH)
http://www.wtnh.com (ABC) -- host of the Mon night debate next week.

AK into her cell phone: Schlesinger is a nut case -- yelling and screaming -- between the other two, a draw -- Schlesinger took the pressure off -- sidebar the fact that they didn't talk about Iraq.

Schlesinger was entertaining, and he did set himself apart. He could be a fun profile.

We're leaving -- more later.

Recap

I am now sitting in the press room -- just me and Ann Kornbluth. Everybody else ran downstairs to get the spin and do the gaggle, and I just heard Joe's voice in the stairwell -- sneaking away again. After that performance, I'm not surprised he doesn't want to talk to anyone. No Joe supporters here -- after a good showing for Ned outside the front door. Joe also snuck into the hotel -- Ned came into the front door with supporters cheering. UPDATE: Captured nicely by the lead story on NBC30 -- a debate sponsor.

Joe ran out of time -- the rules were such that each candidate had 17 minutes of discussion time, period, and then a closing statement. Joe was done at 1:49, but wouldn't stop talking -- as usual, I suppose the rules don't apply to him. Best line over at FDL -- Joe continuing to talk is the debate equivalent of parking in a handicapped spot.

Joe just came down the stairs with Spazeboy in hot pursuit. Let's hope Spaze nails him. We're doing our best here. UPDATE: Yes, Spazeboy got him -- after one of Joe's goons nearly slammed him against the wall --

Having watched it on closed circuit here in the press room, I think Alan helped himself the most. He was a little over the top, but if you're a Republican, I think Alan gave you a lot to think about. He shot from the hip, and did a great job nailing Joe on his false Republican credentials. Ned didn't take any chances -- there was no need to. Ned is what he is -- an honest, ethical guy who wants to help make a difference in the world. He's not going to change that between now and November 7 or November 7, 2010.

And Joe is Joe. Had trouble dodging and weaving with Alan on his right and Ned on his left -- literally, on the stage. Initially, we thought he got the good seat being in the middle, but no -- he had no where to look or hide. (see next post)

Joe, Your Time is Up!

At 1:49, Lieberman's time is up. He used his 17 minutes -- wish they would turn his mike off.

It will be interesting to see how this is covered on the local news tonight. You can rely on us to report back to you to see the spin. Now time for closing statements.

UPDATE: This is the dunce table behind the podiums -- this is where Joe should have had a seat once he used up all his time. Hopefully, in the next two debates when Joe goes over his time, the tech people will just shut off his damn microphone!

The Lying Lieberman

Lieberman bag man Monahan brings up Joe's completely false ad about Ned laying off people -- Ned has a chance to correct false impression and talk about selling off business units -- then turns to hard-core issues.

Alan says he has the best combo of real people and politics -- and nails Ned on the country club membership.

Joe -- being a senator is an important thing...talking about his record of accomplishments -- and negative Ned again -- Joe defending his ad regarding Ned starting a business from scratch -- "I'll bet small businessmen in this room would like to have the kind of scratch Ned had..."

Schlesinger

If you want to learn more about Alan Schlesinger's opinions, be sure to check out the interview Bob did over the weekend with Pat Carroll. (LINK HERE)

(...and that's "ONLINE JOURNALIST" Pat Carroll...get it right!)

Social Security and Medicare

So, Joe's decided that every time his mike is open, he will whine about Ned misrepresenting him. Alan is kicking ass big time -- continually bringing back to the issues -- very animated -- he is well-informed and on target. Joe has no idea what to do with him. Alan -- "Joe -- you're as disingenuous as the rest of them."

Real Issues Please!

Local NPR reporter brings up Henry Parker and how Ned could accept his endorsement. Alan is phenomenal -- blows off the racial thing and says "we are all good on civil rights" and move on to the issues. Initially, Ned apologizes to Joe -- after Alan says get back to the issues, Joe is whining once again that Ned is negative....whine, whine. "I hope you'll stop it."

Welcome Back...

Check out this video from Spazeboy, shot when we arrived this morning.

Live on CSPAN

Just learned we are live on C-SPAN now. Looks like Ned's not going to sink to Joe's level -- whether that's good or bad is up for discussion. Each candidate has 17 min and in the front row, before the questioners is a table with a seat for each candidate to keep time and let the candidates know how they are doing time-wise. Ned hitting on homeland security now as part of N Korea answer.

Would love to see Ned and Alan gang up on Joe -- the 5th party candidate.

We're fed up with you, Joe

This is a nightmare already. I'm trying to hold my lunch down. Joe is filibustering on the first question! Each candidate gets a total of 17 minutes out of the hour, so Joe is using it all now, it seems -- first question -- after Joe's filibuster -- if I was still attorney general looking to protect the consumer, I'll tell you there will be.....then he attacks Ned for being so negative, and then he says people should keep score -- and if it is in double digits (the attacks that is) then pizza and beer is on Ned. (WTF?!?!)

Live at the Debate

Hi Folks,
We are 2 minutes to air here, so I will dispense with the photos till later. I am sitting here in the press room with CGG, Spazeboy, and T. Party -- Ann Kornbluth from the NYT -- and Dan Balz from the WaPo just left to sit in the room. We are not in the room because the only place we could sit with the rest of the press was off to the side where we wouldn't be able to see anybody's face.

UPDATE: Here's the view from Ned's podium -- microphone on the bottom. That first table was where the timekeepers sat -- and the questioners were off to the side.

Welcome to Debate Central!

Well, sort of.

Today I'm on-call for work, so I can't be at the debate. But our own Senior Political Correspondant Kirby will be on the scene in Stamford and will report back to Central as the situation develops.

Spazeboy, CT Blogger, and CGG from CT Local Politics are also there, so we'll have the situation covered.

Stay tuned for more details as they happen!

(at least, if I don't get called into work)

Watch the debate LIVE!

UPDATE!!! - It looks like NBC-30 here in Connecticut WILL broadcast the debate LIVE after all! Tune in to NBC-30 at 1:00PM here in CT; or if you're out there in the blogosphere, go to the NBC-30 link below for LIVE STREAMING COVERAGE of the debate! That's 1:00 PM Eastern Time.

Viewing note: Watch for Alan Schlesinger to attack Joe gently at first, then hammer him a bit more as the debate goes on. Alan's got a lot of anger and frustration with Joe for "stealing his Republicans", and even though he said he'd hold back a bit on this first debate, I have a hunch that he's going to make his feelings toward Joe quite obvious. It's gonna be fun!

NBC30 will carry the debate LIVE at 1:00 with streaming video (link), and will broadcast it at 7:00PM tonight.

Democratic Candidate Ned Lamont will discuss the issues with Republican Alan Schlesinger and also fifth-party Connecticut For Lieberman "Party of One" nominee Joe Lieberman.

Watch and discuss the debate here later.

The return of The Kiss

Stay tuned for more details. The KISS Float rides again.

The Alan Schlesinger Interview

Meet Alan Schlesinger, Republican for US Senate in Connecticut. Mr. Schlesinger graciously allowed us an hour to discuss the issues with him. This interview runs about 24 minutes, and covers his views on Iraq, Iran, Social Security, the Republican Party, the Senate race in Connecticut, and the candidates he's running against. Here's his official campaign website: Schlesinger2006.



UPDATE: Spazeboy has a transcript of some of the interview on Spazeboy.net. Thanks, Spaze!

So far, we've interviewed Senate candidates Ned Lamont and Alan Schlesinger; we're still waiting to hear back from Senator Lieberman.

As an aside, this was the first two-camera shoot I've ever done. I used my camera and mic on a mic stand, and I set up my two China lamps to provide additional light, then set up Spazeboy's camera and mic stand, wired both mics into a dual jack then plugged them into my camera, and started both cameras and let Online Journalist Pat Carroll take it away. (And she did a fantastic job!)

I edited the two tapes for a good seven hours last night before uploading it to Youtube. It was a learning experience on how to edit a two camera shoot. The important thing was to run both mics into the same camera, and use the "B-camera" only for video. (I know that nobody except Spazeboy and CT Blogger will give a crap about these technical details, but these are the guys who's opinions matter most to me.)

Alan Schlesinger Interview teaser

Today online journalist Pat Carroll and I went to Schlesinger for Senate HQ in Shelton and sat down for an hour with Alan Schlesinger, Republican candidate for US Senate, and discussed his politics, the campaign, his opponents, and the state of politics in Connecticut.

The complete interview will be available tomorrow, Sunday October 15th.

Look for Video Here

Bob taped a great interview with Alan Schlesinger, the official Republican running for Senate in Connecticut this fall. As I type, he is editing, and will have a short clip up soon, and a longer version tomorrow.

Don't miss the Monday debate -- streaming online at 1p Eastern, shown locally at 1pm live and 7pm on tape. C-Span schedule is not up yet. Might want to check MSNBC, too, since our affiliate is owned by NBC.

Joe Lieberman thinks you're stupid

I'm ashamed to admit this, but I'm addicted to the Joe2006.com website.

I can't help it. Every time they post something new, it's like watching a slow-motion movie of the Hindenburg exploding and crashing to the ground.

You can't NOT watch!

So this morning, I copied the latest "Blog of Joe" posts to my new website, The Joe 2006 Blog WITH Commenting Turned On.

As you may recall, Joe couldn't take the heat of dissent and he abruptly turned the comments off, only 6 days after "Danger Stain" promised this:

"We are not going to censor comments from our opponents, unless they post obscene material."

"Instead, we are going to use our free speech to point out any of the blatant lies or crude insults the Lamonsters post to call attention to the kind of negative, destructive politics that Ned and his followers like to practice."

Well, apparently Joe's definition of "Free Speech" doesn't include anyone with a differing opinion. Dan started removing obscenity-free comments that were simply critical of Joe's policies, which annoyed some commenters, who in turn expressed that annoyance, which caused Dan's brain to short-circuit and he did the only thing he could think of...he yanked the comments altogether.

Nice job there, Danny.

So I created the Joe2006Blog to allow you to comment on Joe's Blog. Hey, SOMEBODY had to stand up for Free Speech!

Anyway, I came across another unintentionally ironic post on Joe's website, this one located on that oh-so-cleverly named "The Full Lamonty"...

...because, you see, there was a play called The Full Monty which apparantly had something to do with male nudity.

Which makes perfect sense because Joe has given his full approval to George Bush so the US can ignore Geneva Treaty provisions and force prisoners of war into "naked man pyramids".


So yeah, the name "The Full Lamonty" is absolutely fitting for something that Joe Lieberman has on his official website.

And anyway, Christopher Shays agrees with Joe Lieberman that he doesn't think this is torture.

The latest entry on The Full Lamonty is called "Lamont Misinformation Pollutes Long Island Sound". Among the errors of omission and outright lies, Joe proposes that even though he voted FOR the Bush/Cheney Energy Bill (and he was alone among New England Democrats supporting this awful piece of legislation), the bill doesn't prevent Connecticut from blocking the proposed Broadwater LNG Gas Platform for mid Long Island Sound.

In case you missed it, the Broadwater Platform is basically a floating bomb the size of four city blocks that will be located in the very same area that a 600-foot freighter just ran over a 92-foot sailboat in perfect visibility and calm weather.

What could possibly go wrong?

Joe Lieberman's lies include this: "Broadwater is in New York, not Connecticut, waters. Connecticut never had any authority to block the project, regardless of the Energy Policy Act."

Now, if you're stupid like Joe hopes, you'll take that statement at face value. Joe is counting on you being stupid.

What the Bush/Cheney Energy Bill actually did was REMOVE LOCAL AND STATE JURISDICTION OVER SITING ENERGY PROJECTS SUCH AS BROADWATER!

By voting in favor of the bill, Joe Lieberman gave away the only chance we had of seeing this project halted. He voted to TAKE AWAY NEW YORK'S RIGHT TO OBJECT TO THE PROJECT AND HE GAVE IT TO BUSH AND CHENEY. Guess how they'll rule on this.

That's what Joe did.

Don't fall for his empty lies. The more you know, the more Joe hates it.

"Just a Boy and His Dog"

(Oliphant cartoon via MFWblog.)

Dodd Proposes Shift In Iraq

Hartford Courant - October 13, 2006
By DAVID LIGHTMAN, Washington Bureau Chief

PROVIDENCE -- U.S. Sen. Christopher J. Dodd Thursday altered his course on Iraq, calling for a goal of repositioning U.S. troops from current Iraqi positions beginning immediately and finishing within 12 to 18 months.

Dodd, D-Conn., earlier this year had joined most other Democratic senators in rejecting precise timetables, calling instead for the beginning of phased redeployment by the end of this year.

But, he told students, faculty and alumni in a speech at Providence College: "The hour has arrived when Iraq must assume the responsibility of policing itself."

He offered a blueprint of how he would redeploy U. S. troops now in Iraq.

"We must begin immediately to reposition our troops from Baghdad, Fallujah and other large urban centers," he said, to Kurdistan and other less populated areas of Iraq.

That way, Dodd said, "training of Iraqi forces could continue."

He would also move troops to border areas, "where they can protect the territorial integrity of Iraq until Iraqi forces can do so themselves."

Good job, Senator.

Now, are there any OTHER senators around who might want to accept the reality that we'll NEVER "win" in Iraq, and that we'd be better served by providing the Iraqis the training and tools to take care of themselves?

Dick Cheney applies lips to Lieberman

Republicans are scrambling to the aid of Joe Lieberman. Vice President Dick Cheney tells us of his love for Joe. Can any rational person tell me WHY Lieberman should stay in office?

From this article at The Raw Story:

With less than a month to go before the elections, Vice President Dick Cheney offered up strong words of praise for Joe Lieberman, while taking shots at the "Dean Democrats" who have "purged" the Connecticut senator from the Democratic Party.

"The case of Joe Lieberman is a perfect illustration of the basic philosophical difference between the two parties in the year 2006," Cheney said at a Topeka, Kansas fundraiser for Rep. Jim Ryun on Thursday afternoon. "And it's a reminder that the elections on November 7th will have enormous consequences for this nation, one way or the other."

Lieberman is running for reelection as an Independent after his upset in the Democratic primary by challenger Ned Lamont, which was primarily due to his continued support of the war in Iraq and his perceived coziness with the Bush Administration.

After slamming DNC Chairman Howard Dean for declaring nearly three years ago that "the capture of Saddam [Hussein] has not made America safer," Cheney said that "[p]erhaps it should come as no surprise that such a party would turn its back on a man like Senator Joe Lieberman of Connecticut."

In December of 2003, Lieberman had said that Dean was living in a "spider hole of denial" if he believed America wouldn't be safer after the former Iraqi leader's capture.

"Senator Lieberman was my opponent in 2000 – Al Gore's running mate, a longtime senator, and one of the most loyal and distinguished Democrats of his generation," said Cheney. "Joe is also an unapologetic supporter of the fight against terror."

The vice president championed the Democratic senator for his "courage to stick" to his convictions, with regards to the war in Iraq.

"He voted to support military action in Iraq when most senators in both parties did the same – and he's had the courage to stick by that vote even when things got tough," Cheney explained. "And now, for that reason alone, the Dean Democrats have purged Joe Lieberman from the Democratic Party."

Many Lamont supporters have also criticized Lieberman for suggesting that it's improper to criticize a president during wartime.

"Their choice, instead, is a candidate whose explicit goal is to give up the fight against the terrorists in Iraq – never mind that Iraq is a fellow democracy; never mind that the Iraqi people and their elected leaders are counting on us," said Cheney.

Hardcore conservative Republicans like Dick Cheney have their political futures staked on Joe Lieberman's campaign. Cheney sees a Lieberman victory as essential to keeping the conservative status quo alive in Washington.

We have a choice in November. We can stay the course.

Or we can elect Ned Lamont, and CHANGE the course. For the better.

Dan Gerstein makes me happy

Sometimes, the simple joy of watching a dumb political hotshot step into a hot, steaming pile of his own dookie is enough to make me believe that we really do live in a beautiful world.

Here's Dangerstain talking on The Young Turks and failing miserably to express anything but utter confusion at Joe's silly opinions.

But he DOES manage to remember to say that it's all Ned Lamont's fault.

About a dozen times.

Watch and enjoy. Sometimes, I really DO enjoy my work.



And yes, that little audio snippet they played in the first minute was grabbed directly from my "Lieberman on Hastert" Youtube video.

I know this for a fact, because if you listen closely to the audio, it gets a lot louder just as Joe says "partisan...uhhh...frenzy". I boosted the volume of the original video at that exact moment in my editing program to drive home Joe's lie.

And I guess it would have killed those Young (self-obsessed, obviously) Turks to include a clever little link to ol' CT Bob. So as punishment, they will remain linkless in this document. If you want to find the "Young Turks", I wouldn't give a google HOW you do it. (get it?)

Anyway, tip o' the Stetson to Fire Dog Lake and their resident giant reptile, TRex.

Lieberman is lying in latest negative ad

For the entire campaign, Ned Lamont has only discussed the issues.

Such as Joe Lieberman's pro-Bush voting record...that is, when he even could be bothered to vote. Things like the War in Iraq, the Alito cloture vote, the terminally-faulted "No Child Left Behind" act, the Terri Schiavo case, etc. etc. etc., whatever Bush wants, etc.

So it's not all that surprising that Lieberman has resorted to outright lying when attacking his Democratically-chosen opponent. Disappointing, yes. But surprising...sadly, no.

It appears that Joe Lieberman will say anything to stay in the Senate.

In his latest litany of lies, Joe claims that while running a successful business, Ned Lamont (apparently viciously and without any good reason other than because he's a meanie) had laid off 68% of the workers at Lamont Digital Systems, the company that Ned started from scratch to create high-tech jobs here in Connecticut.

And Joe claims that his source for this figure was none other then The New York Times, that hallowed repository of journalistic integrity.

The only problem is...the NYTimes never stated that Lamont laid off 68% of his workers!

Joe made that up! The Times actually reported that "the number of employees [at Lamont Digital Systems] dropped to about 40 today from a high of about 125" - but it never said that drop was due to layoffs.

Why? Because they weren't due primarily to layoffs - not even close!

After 9/11, when many businesses were struggling, Lamont's company was forced to sell some of its residential systems to other companies. While the total employment at Lamont Digital Systems declined, many of the jobs were simply moved to other companies, not eliminated.

But we don't expect Joe to dig for the truth about such claims.

It's the same reason why Joe never looked into Bush's claims that there were WMDs in Iraq.

Because Joe Lieberman will say anything to stay in the Senate!

And Joe's claim that Ned was paid "$546,000… That's the salary Ned Lamont paid himself after laying them off," is a complete and utter lie.

The fact is, company records show Ned Lamont's average salary since the time in question after 9/11 was $188,000 - roughly the same salary as a (three-term) U.S. Senator, and far below the average salary of a CEO. [Source: Lamont Digital Systems salary records]

So Joe Lieberman - please stop saying anything to keep your job.

In the business world, with which Ned is very familiar, you can't simply LIE to keep your job...you need to perform.


"I'm Joe Lieberman, and I approved these lies!"

^

We Couldn't Agree More!

What more is there to say? Here are more downloadable posters to share.

Don't miss Bob's latest ad below. You'll love it.

Some great ideas

(Voiceover talent courtesy of Robert Machray)

Troops stuck in Iraq through 2010

Joe Lieberman's quest for a state of endless War in Iraq was given a boost by the Bush administration's decision to commit troops and logistical support in the war-ravaged nation through the year 2010. Riotous cheers were heard eminating from the corporate offices of Halliburton.

Lieberman (pictured above with Bush administration War Advisor Henry Kissinger) wasn't available for comment, but it's safe to assume that he was thrilled by the news. Over 140,000 American troops and hundreds of billions of US tax dollars are expected to be needed to keep the war going as intended.

At current casualty levels, this will translate into over 3,250 more brave American soldiers tragically losing their lives in Iraq. Don't worry though; none of Lieberman's children are serving in the American Armed Forces.

Meanwhile, North Korea and Iran will continue developing their nuclear programs because the Lieberman-backed Bush administration petulantly refuses to indulge in the use of diplomacy.

Of course.

Why would they want to negotiate peace when they can spread war?

Score Another for CTBob

This morning, Bob made it big in LONDON (as in England). The Guardian interviewed Bob for a story on the Google acquisition of YouTube. It's a great story, but here's our guy

Bob Adams, 47, works as an IT specialist in the Connecticut town of Milford. Over the summer, he devoted a great deal of his spare time to anti-Lieberman film-making, managing to confront the senator (his best shot came with a testy encounter about donations from Wal-Mart), and posting about 50 clips to YouTube. "This is another option for people who want to see what's really going on," he says. "And it's a very democratic thing: anyone with a video camera and a computer can get the same shots CNN can get. If you want people to hear your voice, you put up a video, and you're out there. Political reporters have all that 'You're off the bus' stuff to worry about; if they're denied access by the parties, they're going to starve. With someone like me, I don't have that much to lose. If I had to stop doing this tomorrow, it wouldn't make much difference to my life, except I'd have a lot more time to spend with my wife. So they don't have that power over me."

It's a great article, so read the whole thing -- and if you can help us keep Bob making those great videos by getting him a new laptop, the tip jar could use some help. Thanks from me, Kirby, and all the rest who understand the power of the CTBob video productions.

"How Joe Can You Go?"

Sherry Brown needs our help.

And because I'm so grateful to her for sending me two tickets to the big debate on October 23rd, I'm happy to help. Here’s TRex’s post from FDL the other night:

Holy Joe's name is going to appear on the bottom of the ballot this November, and that's got the Friends of Joe Lieberman in something of a tizzy. I'll let Sherry Brown take it from here. (She's the latest in Joe's parade of disposable campaign managers.)

As you may have heard, because Joe is running as an independent petitioning candidate, his name will be listed at the bottom of the ballot. For many people, this will truly be a case of a good man being hard to find.

To make sure voters know where to look for Joe on the ballot, we will soon be launching a statewide public awareness campaign, and we will be asking for your help soon to spread the word.

But before we do, we could use your help right now in brainstorming the best message to deliver to voters.

=========================

Sherry really opened a big-assed can o' worms here! I copied a bunch of suggestions from FDL, but gave up with something like 400 messages to go.

Read these; you'll get the idea:

Less than Zero?
Treat Joe like he treats you: think of him last.
Joe’s down below with the other bottom feeders.
Last in the hearts of his countrymen, last line on the ballot!
Lieberman: Last and least.
“Joe Lieberman: He has to be beneath the other candidates because nothing is beneath him”
“Losers Seek Their Own Level.”
Snakes and Ladders?
Guess who ends up at the bottom…..
“Joe Lieberman - What Lies Beneath”
Racing to the bottom!!
THIS is how low Joe can go!
“We sent him to the bottom of the ballot – Now let’s kick him out the door”
Joe Lieberman: Falling to his level of Incompetence.
“Joe Lieberman at last”
Joe Lieberman: A Mistake Worth Making. Again.
He’s not in Hell, but he can see it from there.
Go low! Vote for Joe!
Joe Lieberman: You’ll Find Me At Rock Bottom
Joe Lieberman - a low-down snake - low down on the ballot!
Bottom Feeders For Joe: Find it at the bottom of the ocean.
When you think Lieberman can’t go any lower - he can! Last line on the ballot!
No Candidate Is Lower Than JOE LIEBERMAN
Joe Lieberman: his placement’s so low they’re pactically giving his vote away!
Joe LieberMe: On the Goodstein, Lollipop!
Joe’s Name On The Ballot: Still Not As Low As Where He Put Your Son
Joe Lieberman: His statements are. . . INNNN-SAAAANE!!
Joe Lieberman, bedrock values at a bedrock place!
Just When You Think You Can’t Go Any Lower, You’ll Find Joe Lieberman
How low can he go?
“Joe Lieberman: Scraping the Bottom of the Ballot” (Spazeboy’s)
Low-mentum!
We saved the Pest for last.
Joe Lieberman? I meant to vote for Pat Buchanan!
Joe Lieberman: Objects on the Ballot Are Lower Than They Appear
Joe Lieberman: Its a short ride to the bottom of the ballot
Joe Lieberman: Still Above The Dogcatcher Candidates
“I urrr will ummm be on the ahem bottom of the uhhh ballot and I would ummm like for uhhhh you to continue to eurrhh support me when you ummm go to the uhhh polls.” (LOL!)
Goe Lowerman
Joe L: Last, all but forgotton
Joe Lieberman: Bear-ly on the ballot at all
Joe Lieberman, he’s beneath the rest.
Joe Lieberman, the clown down under the rest.
Joe Lieatthebottomman
How low can Joe go? Scroll down.
Backwash Joe
Lieberman ‘06: Voyage to the Bottom of the Ballot
Joe Lieberman: Beneath Contempt
Joe Lieberliar: Stuck Where the Tammy Sun Don’t Shine.
Joe Down Dirty Shame
If you are coming to vote for Joe, we parked Joe’s ballot in the handicap spot so stay in your car.
Lieberman : bottom of the barrel - bottom of the ballot!
Unplug Lieberman…drain the swamp
Joe Lieberman: Dead Last
Low, the poor Lieberman!
Joe Lieberman: Last but not leased (he’s fully bought and paid for).
When you’ve hit rock bottom that’s where you’ll find Joe.
Just because Joe doesn’t vote doesn’t mean you shouldn’t.
Vote for Joe. Last on the ballot. First in W’s heart.
Want to vote for Joe? You’ll have to lower yourself….to the last line.
How Joe can you go?

====================

Oh...and Sherry?

You're welcome.

UPDATE: You can add YOUR VERY OWN suggestions for Joe in the Comments section!

Update on new CT voting machine procedures

Late last week I spoke at length with Lesley D. Mara, Deputy Secretary of the State for Connecticut, about the procedures that are being put in place to ensure the election is fair and the results accurate. The new voting machines are being used in 25 municipalities this November, and will be implemented statewide by late Spring 2007.

My first inquiry was about the lack of detailed information about the voting machine in Secretary Bysiewicz's press releases (as an aside, even after all the articles I've written about the new voting machines, I still have to look up Susan's last name to spell it properly!). In some of the press releases, the vendor is named, but you have to go to the LHS Associates of Massachusetts web site to find out that the new machines are actually the Accu-vote OS2000 by Diebold.

In fact, I had trouble finding the name Diebold anywhere on LHS's website. I found the model "Accu-vote OS2000" there, then Googled it to find it's made by Diebold.

It's almost as if the name "Diebold" is something of a dirty word.

When I asked Ms. Mara about this, she assured me that it wasn't a deliberate effort to hide the Diebold name. I suggested that voter confidence would be improved if future press releases contained detailed make and model information on the new voting machines, rather than just referring to them as "optical scanning technology".

I then inquired about the procedures for the new machines. She gave me some details about how the voting officials in the individual towns will need to pick up the machines early in the morning on election day, which will eliminate the "sleep over" of the machines at people's homes. Two election officials will be required to pick them up. If the procedures are followed, no single person should have access to the machine at any point. This can help prevent machine tampering.

The Secretary's office will also limit the how close to the election any manufacturer "patches" can be installed on the machines. The University of Connecticut Computer Science department will be given proper time to verify whatever patches or fixes Diebold sends will actually do what it's supposed to, and not install a hack or hidden program onto the tabulators. Ms. Mara also promised to get me the results of the UConn certification report of the machines and also the details on the manditory audits of approximately 5% of the voting machines to verify the results against the paper ballots.

I'd like to thank Ms. Mara for her time. While there are potential problems with any new technology, it's obvious that the Secretary of State's office is very concerned with security in the elections, and we welcome their help in distributing information about the new machines. I will follow up on this before the election, and I invite anyone from the Secretary of State's office to email me if they want to make any statements on this blog.

The Secretary of State's official website, with all their press releases, is located at http://sots.ct.gov

Branford Boy may be right...

It's possible I AM becoming insufferable.

New York Magazine online (link) asked if they could use my blogger's profile image for a story on my video blogging with Joe Lieberman.

I said "Sure, have fun!".

Mere minutes later, the story above appeared online.

I'm very happy with it, of course; but my wife would appreciate it if you'd stop feeding my overblown ego like this.

You see, she feels that I'm in immediate danger of becoming...insufferable.

Joe's "taxic waste" problem

(graphical kudos to the mondo awesome Paul Molloy)

"Hacking" Investigation update

Today I called Attorney General Richard Blumenthal's office and asked about the investigation into the alleged "hacking" incident that the Lieberman campaign claimed had shut down their website the night before the Primary back on August 7th.

When the Joe2006.com website first crashed, Lieberman's campaign loudly squawked that there was some foul play afoot. Then they proceeded to issue press releases and threats to possibly challenge the primary results because of this "coordinated attack" on their website.

Skeptics have proposed that the Joe2006 website crashed not due to any hack attack, but rather through the short-sighted lack of planning by Lieberman's staff, and their attempt to run the website on a server that had extremely limited bandwidth and couldn't handle the huge jump in traffic during the hours leading up to the primary.

Richard Blumenthal's office issued this press release:

Attorney General To Investigate Hacking Of Lieberman Campaign Web Site

August 8, 2006
"I have received a complaint from Sen. Lieberman's campaign asking my office to investigate the hacking of his campaign web site. I will investigate potential violations of anti-hacking provisions of our state computer crimes laws that are specifically within my jurisdiction. I will also work with the State Elections Enforcement Commission, and state and federal criminal authorities concerning possible violations of state election statutes, and federal election protections and other laws. We will seek civil and criminal penalties, where appropriate."

That's well and good. But it's been over TWO MONTHS since this investigation began, with absolutely no word on it's progress.

So today I contacted the AG's office, and found someone willing to speak off the record. Off the record didn't really matter, because he couldn't tell me much beyond the fact that the investigation is ongoing and they can't discuss it.

When I brought up the possibility that Lieberman's campaign may have used their poorly-maintained server crash as an opportunity to attack the Lamont campaign and it's supporters, and there has been no resolution of the situation, what would keep them from doing the same thing on election day in November? They tried to use their server crash as an excuse to attack Lamont's campaign and get plenty of media coverage for their campaign; and they got tons of national attention, without any proof of their charges.

In the interest of providing an environment where a FAIR election can be run, it would be very helpful for the AG's office to at the very least publish some preliminary findings in advance of November 7th.

I asked the AG's representative to keep me posted on any developments.

Revised: What Did Officeholders do for CT?

OK, from people who wrote comments here and at the official Lamont Blog -- here is a revised chart that includes the competitive Congressional seats we'll be voting on in less than 30 days, and two other events -- Rowland's election as governor, and when we lost a Congressional seat that was held by Jim Maloney (D-Danbury), due to declining CT population. (Click on image to enlarge.)

Finally, you can comment on Joe's Blog!

Because I've created a mirror site called "Joe's 2006 Blog", located at http://joe2006blog.blogspot.com

When Joe's new blog was created last month, Lieberman campaign spokesmodel Dan Gerstein wrote the following:

As you may be able to tell from our new and greatly-improved website, we plan on having a much more robust presence on the Internet for Round Two of this campaign.

Our blog will be a critical part of that effort.

Beyond being a central source of useful information and commentary from our campaign, we hope this will become a gathering place for lively and thoughtful conversation for our supporters – and even our opponents.

Now we fully expect some of our over-exuberant critics to use our blog to attack and insult our candidate and our campaign.

[...]

In fairness, Tagaris did get one thing right. We are not going to censor comments from our opponents, unless they post obscene material.

Instead, we are going to use our free speech to point out any of the blatant lies or crude insults the Lamonsters post to call attention to the kind of negative, destructive politics that Ned and his followers like to practice.

Now that we got that out of the way, gentlemen and ladies, start your search engines.

Well, we all know how well THAT worked out!

Rather than using common sense moderation like 99% of the other blogs in the civilized world, Dan pulled the plug after less than one week. Sure, there was obscenity. But there was also a huge percentage of respectful and thoughtful comments and questions that simply struck too close to home for Joe and his crew to handle. If Gerstein REALLY wanted an exchange of thoughts and opinions, he would have properly moderated the blog and continued to allow FREE SPEECH to exist there.

But it was safer for him to simply do away with all that pesky dissent.

There's nothing scarier to a politician like Joe Lieberman than an informed and thinking constituency.

You're invited to read the actual daily posts on Joe's Blog, and use your Constitutionally Protected Right of Free Speech to comment on them. Links are posted on each blog entry that takes you directly to the joe2006.com blog entry that's quoted, so you can see images and links associated with the text.

http://joe2006blog.blogspot.com

North Korea defies World; Hastert speaks

Embattled House Speaker Dennis Hastert on the North Korea nuclear test:

"We stand with President Bush and the international community in condemning North Korean Leader Kim Jong-il's reckless decision, and we will provide whatever assistance we can to bring this matter to a stable resolution."

Then, as an unconfirmed report states, Dennis Hastert sent Kim Jong-il (pictured above) a dozen red roses, a Carvel "Fudgie-the-Whale" ice cream cake, and a "thank-you" note.

Just What Did Joe Do for CT?

Here's how Connecticut taxpayers have been treated since 1981. The red line is how many dollars we get back for every dollar we send to Washington. Uh, Joe....why do we send more than we get back? No lobbyist for the Connecticut citizens?

The green line is our ranking in money coming back to the state from Washington. Joe had a couple of good years there when he entered the Senate and seemed to care about Connecticut's needs, but like Joe's interest in US, our rank has crashed to LAST in the nation.

Heckuva job, Joey!

Lamont and Clark on the Hastert question

Spazeboy does it again, with this video that shows Gen. Clark and Ned Lamont discussing Kirby's questions.

"Hastert: Kids at risk...Republicans: America at risk"

(Best Quote Evar!)

Lieberman on the Hastert question

Yeah, Joe and I had another little chat today.

It always amazes me how many evasions, half-truths, and outright lies our favorite Junior senator can squeeze into a one-minute sound bite. Watch and learn...

The General talks to Kirby & Spazeboy

Kirby interviews Brig. Gen. John H. Johns last night, with Spazeboy taping it. Be sure to visit Spazeboy.net (link fixed - sorry, dude!) and show our own resident space alien some love.



Kirby and Spazeboy, you both did an outstanding job! Thanks so much!

Brigadier General John H. Johns, Thank You!

I had the privilege to attend a speech by Brigadier General John H Johns in Hartford last evening. Spazeboy videotaped the whole evening's program (since it was Bob's last sailing night)and we got a knockout interview with this true American patriot who speaks so eloquently about the damage done to the country and our precious servicemen and women with this outrageous mess in Iraq. This is the new backdrop for Connecticut's future -- we all thought it was terrific. It was standing room only at this very successful fundraiser for Ned.

Hastert will resign if it will help...

From a link in the Raw Story:

Embattled House Speaker Dennis Hastert (R-IL) has told conservative activist Paul Weyrich that he would resign if it would help the Republicans, Congressional Quarterly is reporting.

"He said if he thought that resigning would be helpful to the Republicans maintaining the majority, he would do it," Weyrich said in an interview. "But he did not think it would be helpful for Republicans."

CQ staffers report that Weyrich held, in his words, "an emotional telephone conversation" with the Speaker, who is facing accusations that he was aware of disgraced Rep. Mark Foley's (R-FL) behavior issues long before his office has stated he was.

Wow. I think the Republicans are starting to realize that this scandal just won't go away.

First Kirk Fordham, chief of staff to Republican Rep. Tom Reynolds resigns; now Dennis Hastert is floating the "R-word" out there.

This story is developing on an hourly basis.

And to Senator Lieberman: do you STILL think we're being "partisan"?

A great use of Youtube

This is what I'm talking about!

A group called "Young Virginians for Racial Equality" posted this video in response to racist Republican senator George Allen's "macaca" remark.

This is a perfect example of the power of Youtube.

Mark Foley on AOL

(brilliant graphic by Monk via FDL)

OK, this is getting ridiculous. In the Hartford Courant, Joe Lieberman is saying it's partisan to expect House Speaker Dennis Hastert (R-ILL) to be held accountable for allowing admitted drunken potential kid toucher Mark Foley (R-GONE) to engage in his tawdry pursuits with no restraint whatsoever.

Have we collectively gone mad? I feel like we've all taken CRAZY PILLS!

What will it take for Lieberman to accept the fact that one of his Republican heroes has made a criminally bad judgement and deserves to face the consequences? Is our "Democratic" senator stuffed SO DEEPLY in the Republican Party's back pocket that he can't even bring himself to hold Hastert accountable for FAILING TO PROTECT OUR CHILDREN?

Yeah...it's partisan to go after kid touchers.

What were we thinking?

Labor for Lamont

Yesterday Ned Lamont received an important endorsement from AFSCME in New Britain. This is going to be a significant help to the campaign effort. Ned spoke for about 4 minutes and touched on some issues that are important to Connecticut working families.

Plus, there's a surprise question near the end. (Bet you'll watch it now!)

"Only the Iraqi people can resolve this"

Listen...it's very simple:

"Stay The Course" ISN'T working!

It's already wasted thousands of American lives; hundreds of billions of American dollars; and it's made our nation LESS safe.

Joe Lieberman, are you listening?



Scratch that last question, Senator...we all know the answer.

What I want to ask is this:

When will you START listening?

The BBC "gets it"

You gotta admire the BBC News.

Their news reporting is a refreshing departure from the all-too-common "herd mentality" of the mainstream US media. They don't need to spin the news to the wishes of American corporations; they can simply report the truth.

At least, here they can.

I have no idea how they report British news. Who knows? Maybe over in England they're all a bunch of pussies who fold up like cheap lawn chairs under pressure...

You never know.

But here, they can pretty much report on our political scene from an objective viewpoint. We don't get that in our news very often. Check this article from the BBC News:

Connecticut

This Senate race has already provided more drama than any other this year. Incumbent Senator, and former vice-presidential candidate, Joe Lieberman was sensationally beaten (CT Bob: awesome!) in the Democratic primary by businessman Ned Lamont, (CT Bob: notice how it's not "Greenwich millionaire" for a change) who was campaigning primarily against Mr Lieberman's perceived closeness to President Bush and support for the Iraq war. Mr Lieberman is running as an independent, and polls suggest that he is a little ahead.

[...]

SENATE

Incumbent Independent (formerly Democrat) Joe Lieberman (CT Bob: Holy shit! I frickin' LOVE the BBC!) faces Republican Alan Schlesinger and Democrat Ned Lamont. Democrat Christopher J Dodd holds the other seat.

Gotta give 'em credit. I can't imagine ANY of our mainstream media referring to Lieberman as having been "sensationally beaten" in the primary! Nice phrasing there.

Citizen X

Rep. Mark Foley (R-FL) fell quickly from grace after news reports of his tawdry emails to a teenaged Congressional page surfaced recently.

Almost immediately, House Speaker Dennis Hastert (R-IL) denied any knowledge whatsoever of Foley's proclivities, and strongly insisted that had he known, he would have taken decisive action.

But several members of Congress were aware of the situation, and claim to have notified the Speaker of several instances where Foley acted inappropriately (from CNN.com):

Republican Reps. John Shimkus of Illinois and Tom Reynolds of New York have acknowledged that they knew about an "overly friendly" exchange of e-mails in 2005 between Foley and a former male page from Louisiana, which were not sexually explicit.

Reynolds said he took his concerns to Hastert, but Hastert said he doesn't recall the conversation.

"If he did, he brought it in with a whole stack of things," the speaker said.

Lost in the shuffle, eh Mr. Speaker? So it appears that Hastert WAS aware that Foley had a pattern of emailing teenaged boys and acting inappropriately, and did nothing.

Which isn't really a surprise. The current Republican regime has no qualms about stone-walling ANY reports that portray them in a negative way, even at the expense of letting a suspected pedophile act with complete impunity.

As TRex so eloquently stated in Fire Dog Lake:

"...in an environment where secrecy and repression are the law, predators flourish and thrive, escaping detection because nobody wants to admit that there is a problem."

There, in a nutshell, is the problem.

This is a picture of Andrei Chikatilo. He lived in Russia back when it was called the Soviet Union. Chikatilo is now known as "Killer X", or "Citizen X". He was perhaps the most prolific serial killer the world has ever known.

Citizen X was able to get away with more than fifty murders over a twelve-year period due in large part to the Soviet Union's overwhelming beauracracy and paranoid secrecy. The people in charge of the investigation were hampered largely by Communist party officials who didn't want word to leak that a serial killer may be on the loose in the Soviet Union. They tried to convince the investigators that serial killers were a product of the decadent West, and they didn't exist in the USSR.

So Chikatilo was able to continue his gruesome spree for years.

The behaviour of the do-nothing Republicans in this case is similar. They knew of Foley's actions, but chose not to act. They spread lies about how this is a partisen attack, being exposed just before the mid-terms. It doesn't matter that it's a partisen act for the Republicans to sweep the investigation under the carpet.

The total absence of accountability and responsibility displayed by the Republican leadership is astounding. Much like the former Soviet government, eventually their entire party will collapse under the weight of their own lies.

Ned's Not for Sale

Once again, the Courant front-pages a throwaway piece from the AP that Ned contributed $500,000 to his own campaign for Senate. Joe Lieberman, on the other hand, went to Florida for a fundraiser run by Mel Sembler. A Republican crony who... well, just click on the link if you don't know about this guy. (I'm waiting to see if he and Mark Foley are buddies).

Joe's national list of Dems for Joe is filled with former members of Congress who are now big-time lobbyists in some of Joe's favorite areas -- health care, homeland security, major drug industry, defense, oil industry, insurance and health care. Joe has shown us he is for sale to the highest bidder that will do whatever he needs to stay in office.

Ned, on the other hand is not accepting PAC money, and by contributing his own money, he is not beholden to any special interests besides those of OUR state.

So, the next time you hear Ned has made a personal contribution to his campaign, it is just one more piece of the mountain of evidence that says Ned's special interest is US.

Ned Lamont's "Message"

(From nedlamont.com) - Watching the campaign's latest TV ad, "message," might take many of you on a trip down memory lane. Or maybe you are new to the effort and have yet to really experience much of what brought so many together leading up to the August 8 primary?

Either way, with a month to go, there are going to be plenty of opportunities to relive the magic while ultimately electing Ned Lamont to the United States Senate on November 7th.

So watch the ad and use the handy tool below to forward it to your personal networks that might not be as familiar with Connecticut's next United States Senator. Here are some other ways you might help today:

1.) Forward this message to your friends using this link (link)
2.) Look up "family, friends and neighbors" inside CT and send them a physical postcard explaining why you support Ned Lamont (link)
3.) Contact your local campaign headquarters and get involved! (link)
(CT Bob here: see how much fun getting involved can be by watching this video)
4.) Start thinking about hosting a house party, in CT or nationally, for Ned on October 17! (more on this soon)

More Nancy

And when I say "More Nancy", I actually mean "No More Nancy".

CT Progressive reports on the hotly contested race between longtime Republican spud Nancy Johnson and Democratic breath of fresh air Chris Murphy.

The Medicare "donut hole" endorsed by Johnson represents quite literally the void in leadership that the 5th District has endured for the long years since President Reagan was a noob. It's time for a change. Visit "No More Nancy".

"Speak English or Die"

It's rare that I'm struck speechless by an image. But I'm afraid if I comment upon this, I'll use naughty words that will offend everybody who reads this blog. And my regular readers know I'm not adverse to using a bit o' salty language on occasion.

Lots of occasions, in fact.

But I'll just let the hateful people in this picture speak for themselves:

This photo and many other were taken by CT Blogger, who runs ConnecticutBLOG and also a Danbury-based blog called Hat City Blog. There was a march to support 11 undocumented aliens who were picked up and arrested recently when they were trying to make an honest living!

Meanwhile, we have a US Representative who had to resign because he wanted to perform illegal acts on a child, but he's still walking around free.

Good thing this country has a firm sense of proportion.

There is hope for the situation, I think. A good number of people showed up to support the immigrants in their struggle for an chance at the American Dream. Our nation was founded by the promise of opportunity.

Visit Hat City Blog to read CT Blogger's excellent coverage of the event, and also be sure to click here for the full set of CT Blogger's photos.

Spazeboy nails Nancy "Donut Hole" Johnson

Not literally. Ew. I don't think any of us could stomach THAT!

But Spazeboy scored a major coup by covering a protest at the "honorable" Nancy Johnson's office on Friday. From Spazeboy.net - well done, Spazeboy:

On Friday, I attended a protest and rally at Nancy Johnson’s New Britain office. This is my video report.


Carol Marie Pomerleau has been in the donut hole–the gap in coverage wherein the beneficiary is obligated to continue paying premiums and pay $3,000 out of pocket before coverage kicks back in–since July 10, 2006. Pomerleau’s protest is unlikely to sway Congresswoman Johnson, but one hopes it calls attention to Johnson’s principal role in the creation of the donut hole that many seniors and disabled may soon find themselves in.

The New Britain Herald has more:

“‘Thank you for your hellhole of a donut hole,’” Pomerleau said she told Johnson, who replied, “‘Well, at least we got it into law.’ That was her only response. She kept repeating it.”
Pomerleau said she expected to be arrested for civil disobedience.
“At least if something happens to me while I’m in jail they’ll have to send me to a hospital,” she said.
Because of her condition the New Britain police decided not to arrest her. A diabetic and cancer survivor, who suffered a heart attack, she underwent an artery bypass “that went bad,” woke up with a stroke, and was confined to a hospital bed for seven weeks. After her release, she has been experiencing mini strokes and seizures.
“Nancy Johnson authored the Medicare Part D legislation that put the interest of the pharmaceutical companies over people,” said Pomerleau. “I’m mad as hell and I’m not going to take it anymore.”

Those who are so inclined should know that contributions to my (Beau's) tip jar are greatly appreciated. I try only to “push” the jar after I’ve invested a good chunk of time into making a video to share. That’s the case today.