tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26427738.post115508742943857031..comments2023-11-02T08:52:30.787-04:00Comments on Connecticut Bob: 45% of precinctsUnknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger15125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26427738.post-1155088240034082072006-08-08T21:50:00.000-04:002006-08-08T21:50:00.000-04:00It's gonna be close, but not that close. My guess...It's gonna be close, but not that close. My guess for final tally: Lamont 53, Lieberman 47Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26427738.post-1155088188958690002006-08-08T21:49:00.001-04:002006-08-08T21:49:00.001-04:00Update from the Ballroom80% ReportingLamont 117,00...Update from the Ballroom<BR/>80% Reporting<BR/>Lamont 117,000<BR/>Lieberman 103,000Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26427738.post-1155088176067676892006-08-08T21:49:00.000-04:002006-08-08T21:49:00.000-04:00Bridgport is 51% to Lieberman with 20/25 reporting...Bridgport is 51% to Lieberman with 20/25 reportingAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26427738.post-1155088121087321132006-08-08T21:48:00.002-04:002006-08-08T21:48:00.002-04:00423 of 748 - 56.55% Lamont, Ned Dem 79,580 52.17Li...423 of 748 - 56.55%<BR/> <BR/>Lamont, Ned Dem 79,580 52.17<BR/>Lieberman, Joe Dem 72,964 47.83Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26427738.post-1155088092167757022006-08-08T21:48:00.001-04:002006-08-08T21:48:00.001-04:00Ned is pulling out a bit more...little bit'Ned is pulling out a bit more...little bit'Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26427738.post-1155088058011517592006-08-08T21:47:00.001-04:002006-08-08T21:47:00.001-04:00Lets hope that this is really the effect from pro ...Lets hope that this is really the effect from pro Lieberman city results coming in, and not some rethug hacker connected to the voting machines :(Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26427738.post-1155087912127431052006-08-08T21:45:00.000-04:002006-08-08T21:45:00.000-04:00"Getting closer:"Yup, and the Hartford Courant now..."Getting closer:"<BR/><BR/>Yup, and the Hartford Courant now seems to have a fast connection for the numbers...Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26427738.post-1155087801752492422006-08-08T21:43:00.001-04:002006-08-08T21:43:00.001-04:00SecState says out of staters are crashing their re...SecState says out of staters are crashing their results site?<BR/><BR/>This CLOWN blogging for the NYT just posted another link to the CT SecState site like 10 minutes ago, and no sooner than the state site had been back up.. its been downed AGAIN!<BR/><BR/>http://empirezone.blogs.nytimes.com/?p=504Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26427738.post-1155087796089424652006-08-08T21:43:00.000-04:002006-08-08T21:43:00.000-04:00It's getting way too tight, way too fast... I dunn...It's getting way too tight, way too fast... I dunno, this one may go down to the wire...Aquariahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07578444793424041263noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26427738.post-1155087749183362932006-08-08T21:42:00.001-04:002006-08-08T21:42:00.001-04:00Getting closer:404 of 748 Precincts Reporting - 54...Getting closer:<BR/><BR/>404 of 748 Precincts Reporting - 54.01%<BR/>Name Party Votes Pct<BR/>Lamont Dem 74,396 51.98<BR/>LiebermanDem 68,718 48.02Bhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07134613201384730701noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26427738.post-1155087740956760642006-08-08T21:42:00.000-04:002006-08-08T21:42:00.000-04:00This is a nailbiter.How do these results usually b...This is a nailbiter.<BR/><BR/>How do these results usually break in CT?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26427738.post-1155087687067080702006-08-08T21:41:00.000-04:002006-08-08T21:41:00.000-04:00Bob's numbers:Lamont 53.5Lieberman 46.4Bob's numbers:<BR/><BR/>Lamont 53.5<BR/>Lieberman 46.4Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26427738.post-1155087557424578352006-08-08T21:39:00.001-04:002006-08-08T21:39:00.001-04:00It's getting tighter.According to the latest, it's...It's getting tighter.<BR/><BR/>According to the latest, it's 52 Lamont - 48 Lieberman, with a little over 50% reporting.<BR/><BR/>http://hosted.ap.org/dynamic/files/elections/2006/by_state/CT_Page_0808.html?SITE=CTHARELN&SECTION=POLITICSAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26427738.post-1155087541983163412006-08-08T21:39:00.000-04:002006-08-08T21:39:00.000-04:00376 of 748 Precincts Reporting - 50.27% Name Party...376 of 748 Precincts Reporting - 50.27%<BR/> Name Party Votes Pct<BR/> Lamont, Ned Dem 70,444 52.13<BR/> Lieberman, Joe (i) Dem 64,700 47.87Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26427738.post-1155087519343272252006-08-08T21:38:00.000-04:002006-08-08T21:38:00.000-04:00376 of 748 Precincts Reporting - 50.27%Name Party ...376 of 748 Precincts Reporting - 50.27%<BR/>Name Party Votes Pct<BR/>Lamont Dem 70,444 52.13<BR/>LiebermanDem 64,700 47.87Bhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07134613201384730701noreply@blogger.com