tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26427738.post3544924901756661724..comments2023-11-02T08:52:30.787-04:00Comments on Connecticut Bob: Thanks for nothingUnknownnoreply@blogger.comBlogger10125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26427738.post-23528854864838634432008-10-28T08:34:00.000-04:002008-10-28T08:34:00.000-04:00I can't even remotely conceive of that Aussie bast...I can't even remotely conceive of that Aussie bastard transplant ever doing anything like that.CT Bobhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07334232414964958641noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26427738.post-22613973517239761142008-10-27T23:25:00.000-04:002008-10-27T23:25:00.000-04:00If the Wall Street Journal (now owned by Rupert Mu...If the Wall Street Journal (now owned by Rupert Murdoch/F**ks News) endorses Obama, you'll have to Photoshop a SHITLOAD of lifeboats onto the SS McCAIN PALIN.....Bob Symmeshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03229871052043711728noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26427738.post-45902938699708464012008-10-27T13:29:00.000-04:002008-10-27T13:29:00.000-04:00Courant endorsements. I guess that's why my dear o...Courant endorsements. I guess that's why my dear old dad would only read The Hartford Times. After reading James Howard Kunstler today I'm ready to switch to John McCain. Somones head has to roll before this financial whirlpool ends. In the over half century I've voted I voted for a president. Not a Commander In Chief but I'm afraid we will need a brutal son of military commanders to ward off theAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26427738.post-72386502373813378302008-10-27T09:09:00.000-04:002008-10-27T09:09:00.000-04:00"And no, they wouldn't have printed this. They wer...<I>"And no, they wouldn't have printed this. They were consistent about selecting my worst post of the week about 70% of the time."</I><BR/><BR/>I know that they were featuring your material before the layoffs but everything you say in that comment up there, Bob, was exactly what I figured they would do when they were soliciting Bloggers material. <BR/><BR/>And while some in the right wing Connecticut Man1https://www.blogger.com/profile/08923884330387123010noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26427738.post-82237323858153988942008-10-27T02:01:00.000-04:002008-10-27T02:01:00.000-04:00Can't the Senate Dems trade Lieberman for some dis...Can't the Senate Dems trade Lieberman for some disillusioned Repubs who can be trained to heel? Most DC Repubs have been taught reflexive obedience by party leaders like Delay and Ginrich, so housebreaking them shouldn't be too tough. A few nice perks and some pork would make that magic 60 easy to come by, without whollyforjoe.<BR/>oldswedeAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26427738.post-75044344462945572302008-10-26T22:38:00.000-04:002008-10-26T22:38:00.000-04:00What I think is most awesome is that despite that ...What I think is most awesome is that despite that track record, they're the paper that the repellent Family Institute singles out for having some kind of "liberal bias." Awesome.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26427738.post-16742532888898414432008-10-26T22:16:00.000-04:002008-10-26T22:16:00.000-04:00He's desperately trying to still remain relevant a...He's desperately trying to still remain relevant after January, so he's making conciliatory statements. The Democrats probably won't need him, unless we're so close to 60 in the Senate that we depend on his vote. Let's hope that isn't the case.CT Bobhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07334232414964958641noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26427738.post-35441870934572003792008-10-26T20:48:00.000-04:002008-10-26T20:48:00.000-04:00Did you see Lieberman in the Courant the other day...Did you see Lieberman in the Courant the other day saying his comments on the campaign trail have been "within bounds" ?????<BR/>and then tried to distance himself from his beloved's campaign tenor?<BR/><BR/>"I am prepared to be held accountable for my own comments on the campaign trail," Lieberman said in the article.<BR/><BR/>What a vile man.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26427738.post-48891658421664317842008-10-26T20:28:00.000-04:002008-10-26T20:28:00.000-04:00They might have, but first they would have changed...They might have, but first they would have changed the headline, edited it for content and space (diminishing or changing the entire tone of the post), and broke it up so the title and author appears on one online page and the content on another.<BR/><BR/>In other words, I wasn't brokenhearted when they discontinued the feature.<BR/><BR/>And no, they wouldn't have printed this. They were CT Bobhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/07334232414964958641noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-26427738.post-43276310903118270922008-10-26T19:55:00.000-04:002008-10-26T19:55:00.000-04:00Too bad the Courant dropped their "Connecticut Onl...Too bad the Courant dropped their "Connecticut Online" section. I'd love to see if they pick up this post.Beauhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16678362998156967998noreply@blogger.com