Jim Himes finished his 17 towns in 17 days "Listening and Leading" tour on Monday, before a standing room only crowd at the Ferguson Library in Stamford. Himes is going to face Democratic challenger Lee Whitnum in the 4th District primary on Tuesday, August 12th. (Wilton meeting pictured above)
Even though Himes is heavily favored to win, it's important for Democrats to show a strong turnout on Primary day, which will emphasize party unity and enthusiasm for a November victory. Visit the Himes For Congress Primary Info Center for details on where to vote and how you can help!
Also this week, there was a big endorsement event at McLevy Green in Bridgeport on Tuesday, where Attorney General Dick Blumenthal, Secretary of State Susan Bysiewicz, State Comptroller Nancy Wyman, and Bridgeport Mayor Bill Finch joined Democratic leaders from Bridgeport to stand in unity behind Jim Himes exactly two weeks before the August 12th primary.
ConnecticutBob.Com is a modest blog on the internet since 2006. Progressive ideas are encouraged, and all politically-minded and reasonable people are welcome. America is the greatest country in the world, but we'll invade you if you disagree.
Thursday, July 31, 2008
Colbert on torture
A little humor on this fine morning, while I'm waiting for the Ted Stevens frog march and mug shot later today.
Wednesday, July 30, 2008
Lee Whitnum on Afghanistan
Candidate in the 4th CD Democratic primary Lee Whitnum rants during the televised debate between her and Jim Himes.
Full disclosue: I am one of the "wined and dined" bloggers Lee refers to in the second video below. I didn't realize I was wrecking the Constitution at the time. I had to drive 85 miles round trip to meet Jim and his family, for which I was treated to a single beer and some potato chips.
But I think the beer was imported, if that counts. It might have been a Rolling Rock though. It was in a green bottle, that much I recall. Somebody stop the presses!
Afghanistan should belong to the Taliban:
It's unconstitutional to talk to bloggers:
WTF! Where is "the healthy separation between press and candidate" written in the Constitution? Is there a page missing somewhere? Somebody's holding out on me! C'mon, I want that missing page, goddammit!
Jesus. And did you hear when she finally got around to answering the question about whether our civil liberties have been compromised, she finally said "I don't think we have given up our civil liberties, that much".
THAT MUCH?!? You're kidding, right? You can't get a "little pregnant", Lee; either our rights ARE compromised or they're NOT! By saying "that much", you're AGREEING with Jim Himes, even if you don't know it. Sheesh!
Holy cow! It's only Wednesday, and it's ALREADY been an incredible week! The debate; Lieberman's rat; Ted Stevens...shit like this makes blogging easy! The blog basically writes itself; all I do is type it in!
Full disclosue: I am one of the "wined and dined" bloggers Lee refers to in the second video below. I didn't realize I was wrecking the Constitution at the time. I had to drive 85 miles round trip to meet Jim and his family, for which I was treated to a single beer and some potato chips.
But I think the beer was imported, if that counts. It might have been a Rolling Rock though. It was in a green bottle, that much I recall. Somebody stop the presses!
Afghanistan should belong to the Taliban:
It's unconstitutional to talk to bloggers:
WTF! Where is "the healthy separation between press and candidate" written in the Constitution? Is there a page missing somewhere? Somebody's holding out on me! C'mon, I want that missing page, goddammit!
Jesus. And did you hear when she finally got around to answering the question about whether our civil liberties have been compromised, she finally said "I don't think we have given up our civil liberties, that much".
THAT MUCH?!? You're kidding, right? You can't get a "little pregnant", Lee; either our rights ARE compromised or they're NOT! By saying "that much", you're AGREEING with Jim Himes, even if you don't know it. Sheesh!
Holy cow! It's only Wednesday, and it's ALREADY been an incredible week! The debate; Lieberman's rat; Ted Stevens...shit like this makes blogging easy! The blog basically writes itself; all I do is type it in!
Large rodent to appear at Republican Convention
Sen. Joe Lieberman (I-CT) may be greeted by an enormous rat should he appear at the Republican National Convention in September, so says the blogger known as "Anderson Scooper".
"If Joe Lieberman is going to be out there, then we're going to have our say," Anderson said. "You can't do what Joe's doing. There's rules to the game." Anderson recently started the 4th Street News, a blog covering the Congressional race in the 4th district between Jim Himes and Chris Shays (with a little bit of Lee Whitnum thrown in to spice things up).
As reported in the Greenwich Time this morning, Anderson may display the giant inflatable varmint (artist's conception above) right outside the XCel Energy Center, which is where Lieberman would speak should he decide at the last minute to pull a "Zell Miller".
A spokesperson for Lieberman said that the senator currently has no plans to speak at the convention. But like a lab rat making its way through a maze, something tells me that the senator will eventually find his piece of cheese on that stage in St. Paul.
"If Joe Lieberman is going to be out there, then we're going to have our say," Anderson said. "You can't do what Joe's doing. There's rules to the game." Anderson recently started the 4th Street News, a blog covering the Congressional race in the 4th district between Jim Himes and Chris Shays (with a little bit of Lee Whitnum thrown in to spice things up).
As reported in the Greenwich Time this morning, Anderson may display the giant inflatable varmint (artist's conception above) right outside the XCel Energy Center, which is where Lieberman would speak should he decide at the last minute to pull a "Zell Miller".
A spokesperson for Lieberman said that the senator currently has no plans to speak at the convention. But like a lab rat making its way through a maze, something tells me that the senator will eventually find his piece of cheese on that stage in St. Paul.
Tuesday, July 29, 2008
Father of the Toobz is dead
Republican Senator Ted Stevens' political career died suddenly today in Alaska. It was 56 years old.
Stevens has been an undaunted supporter of the telecom corporations, and was personally responsible for creating that wonderful "series of tubes" commonly known as "the internet". Stevens worked diligently with the telecoms against net neutrality before his untimely demise. He also helped create the biggest monument to pork barrel spending in American history, the "Bridge to Nowhere".
Stevens is survived by Mark Begich, current mayor of Anchorage and Democratic candidate for Senate in Alaska.
In lieu of flowers, donations will be accepted at Mark Begich For Senate. If you support the freedom of the internet, consider sending a donation in loving memory of Ted Stevens' political career.
Remember, the toobz is a terrible thing to waste.
UPDATE: Failure is a communicable disease obviously spread by casual contact.
Stevens has been an undaunted supporter of the telecom corporations, and was personally responsible for creating that wonderful "series of tubes" commonly known as "the internet". Stevens worked diligently with the telecoms against net neutrality before his untimely demise. He also helped create the biggest monument to pork barrel spending in American history, the "Bridge to Nowhere".
Stevens is survived by Mark Begich, current mayor of Anchorage and Democratic candidate for Senate in Alaska.
In lieu of flowers, donations will be accepted at Mark Begich For Senate. If you support the freedom of the internet, consider sending a donation in loving memory of Ted Stevens' political career.
Remember, the toobz is a terrible thing to waste.
UPDATE: Failure is a communicable disease obviously spread by casual contact.
Monday, July 28, 2008
Whitnum - Himes debate today
Right now I'm at a hotel in Burlington, Vermont that has spotty internet access at best, so this is going to be a brief update. I was forced by my incessant need to earn a living to drive 300 miles immediately after the debate. So now I'm in a $79 hotel with shitty internet access that makes it necessary for me to save my work every, oh, twenty or so keystrokes.
Today was the long-awaited debate between candidates for the 4th CD Democratic nomination Jim Himes and Lee Whitnum. I was there, along with CTLP front pager Gabe Rosenberg, 4thStreetBlog blogger "Anderson Scooper", and Greenwich Time reporter Neil Vigdor.
I'll post more in-depth coverage in a day or so, but right now I'm stuck up here in Ben & Jerry country with little or no connectivity. After uploading the photos below, I'm already an hour into this stupid article.
Here's Himes' campaign manager Maura with Jim and his charming wife Mary right before the debate.
Lee Whitnum rolls in. Lee didn't arrive until about 20 minutes AFTER the scheduled start of the debate, so the entire thing didn't begin until it was almost 35 minutes late.
Settling in before the debate, Jim straightens his tie while Lee searches for a brush. It was weird watching their preparations from the green room with no audio. When the debate started, we weren't allowed in the studio and needed to watch the event remotely. Which made it fun, as we could make observations without fear of being overheard.
I'm sort of wondering what Neil Vigdor will report tomorrow, as it seemed every time I said something, he was scribbling away.
Nah, I'm only kidding. Neil seemed like a really nice guy, and I'm willing to believe he wouldn't betray our journalistic confidence. Us reporters need to stick together, you know.
Moments before the start. The moderator Tom something or other (if I had decent internet access, I'd be able to fact check this) (UPDATE: it was Tom Appleby) did a really good job keeping the debate moving, despite Lee's insistence on getting her complete agenda heard.
Immediately after the debate, Lee answers questions from Neil, "Anderson Scooper", and me. I asked about some assertions that Lee made, and she had some interesting theories about them. Video will be available soon.
That's what we call a "teaser" in the business. It'll get you to come back again until you get to see the video. Smart, huh?
OK, I've been working on this thing for the last 90 minutes. I don't even know if it'll post, so if it looks really fucked up, don't blame me.
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
Broadcast schedule for this weekend on Cablevision News 12
Saturday
7:30 AM
11:00 AM
2:30 PM
7:30 PM
Sunday
2:30 AM
4:30 AM
11:00 AM
1:30 PM
5:30 PM
Monday
4:30AM
Today was the long-awaited debate between candidates for the 4th CD Democratic nomination Jim Himes and Lee Whitnum. I was there, along with CTLP front pager Gabe Rosenberg, 4thStreetBlog blogger "Anderson Scooper", and Greenwich Time reporter Neil Vigdor.
I'll post more in-depth coverage in a day or so, but right now I'm stuck up here in Ben & Jerry country with little or no connectivity. After uploading the photos below, I'm already an hour into this stupid article.
Here's Himes' campaign manager Maura with Jim and his charming wife Mary right before the debate.
Lee Whitnum rolls in. Lee didn't arrive until about 20 minutes AFTER the scheduled start of the debate, so the entire thing didn't begin until it was almost 35 minutes late.
Settling in before the debate, Jim straightens his tie while Lee searches for a brush. It was weird watching their preparations from the green room with no audio. When the debate started, we weren't allowed in the studio and needed to watch the event remotely. Which made it fun, as we could make observations without fear of being overheard.
I'm sort of wondering what Neil Vigdor will report tomorrow, as it seemed every time I said something, he was scribbling away.
Nah, I'm only kidding. Neil seemed like a really nice guy, and I'm willing to believe he wouldn't betray our journalistic confidence. Us reporters need to stick together, you know.
Moments before the start. The moderator Tom something or other (if I had decent internet access, I'd be able to fact check this) (UPDATE: it was Tom Appleby) did a really good job keeping the debate moving, despite Lee's insistence on getting her complete agenda heard.
Immediately after the debate, Lee answers questions from Neil, "Anderson Scooper", and me. I asked about some assertions that Lee made, and she had some interesting theories about them. Video will be available soon.
That's what we call a "teaser" in the business. It'll get you to come back again until you get to see the video. Smart, huh?
OK, I've been working on this thing for the last 90 minutes. I don't even know if it'll post, so if it looks really fucked up, don't blame me.
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
Broadcast schedule for this weekend on Cablevision News 12
Saturday
7:30 AM
11:00 AM
2:30 PM
7:30 PM
Sunday
2:30 AM
4:30 AM
11:00 AM
1:30 PM
5:30 PM
Monday
4:30AM
Hagel: McCain on "thin ground"
Sen. Chuck Hagal, along with Sen. Jack Reed, appeared on CBS's "Face The Nation" to discuss their recent Middle East trip with Barack Obama.
From CBS/AP:
(Hagel) criticized the McCain campaign for its latest television ad attacking the Democratic candidate.Hagel stated that McCain was "treading on some very thin ground here when he impugns motives, and when we start to get into 'You're less patriotic than me, I'm more patriotic.'
The ad blasts Obama for not visiting wounded troops during his visit to Germany. Obama has said he chose to cancel a visit to a military hospital there after consultations with the Pentagon, due to concerns that such a visit might be seen as using wounded troops for political purposes.
The McCain ad, which contains footage of Obama bouncing a basketball before U.S. military personnel in Kuwait, implied that Obama was being disrespectful to troops by making "time to go to the gym" during his overseas trip while at the same time cancelling a visit with wounded troops.
"Seems the Pentagon wouldn't allow him to bring cameras," the ad insinuates.
The commercial began airing after a week of news coverage of Obama appearing with foreign leaders and speaking to cheering European crowds. The McCain campaign has suggested that Obama preferred that audience to wounded American soldiers.
"John McCain is always there for our troops," the ad said.
Obama's campaign called the new accusation "wildly inappropriate."
"They're better off to focus on policy differences," he said, "It's just not responsible to be saying things like that, again, if for no other reason than for the good of this country and the world.
I agree with what he's saying, but I don't know if I've ever heard the phrase "treading on thin ground" before. Shouldn't that be "on thin ice"? Or maybe Hagel is referring to "dangerous ground", which would make sense in this context also. But "thin ground" seems like a mixed metaphor. Taken literally, if McCain is on thin ground, then the danger is that he'll break through the surface and crash below to what, more solid ground? Or mud? Maybe molten hot magma? This is bugging me. Somebody explain it to me, please.
Other than Hagel's obvious mangling of a stale cliche, he was spot on about the McCain campaign's outrageous charges. Sen. Reed also strongly condemned the actions by McCain. I think if this is happening now and it's only July, I can't wait to see what they'll pull when the REALLY get desperate!
Sunday, July 27, 2008
Hartford Courant's "Connecticut Online"
For the last four weeks or so, selected articles from my blog have been reproduced in the Hartford Courant's new opinion section, "Connecticut Online: Excerpts from State Blogs" The Courant has decided to start including these excerpts from various blogs in their Sunday opinion pages and in the new online section.
(Note: the link above might not be permanent, so if you can't get there, go to the Courant Op Ed page and look for the "Connecticut Online" link in the list of articles)
So far it's been an interesting experience. I've seen at least four of my articles (*) reprinted in the Courant, although they are edited for space and lacking the videos and pictures, which I think tends to detract from the impact of my admittedly sophomoric writing. Hey, I'll be the first to admit that I depend heavily on off-beat videos and interesting images to make my point, but for the most part the articles they reprint are clear enough.
The timing of the Courant's introduction of this program was a bit disturbing, since it was shortly followed with their announcement of layoffs of reporters and staff. There's no question that this may be seen by some as a way for them to get free content to replace the output of their formerly paid employees. Believe me, the last thing I ever want to do is take food off of someone's table.
But for the most part, the inclusion of the blog excerpts is more like the "Letters to the Editor" section, which is also "free content" culled from the "masses". None of the bloggers are being paid for their content as far as I know. At least, I'm not, that's for sure.
I'm not writing anything FOR the Courant. Since I write first and only for my blog, if the Courant wants to reprint my work for distribution and they agree not to twist my words, I'm fine with it. It helps get my progressive opinions out there for more people to read. There are plenty of Republican blogs who are taking advantage of this program, and unless we want to let this information pathway be completely dominated by them, it's necessary to participate.
The major drawbacks of this program are 1) they select and edit the articles without my input. When I see them appear, that's when I know what they selected, and 2) none of my awesome video or images included. I've retained the option of opting out of the program at any time for any reason, but so far I'm fairly satisfied with it. I do have to watch myself that I don't start editing my writing to reflect what they'll use (like, do I need to use those three "fucks", or can I make my point with two "hecks" and a "darn"?)
If I ever start doing that, as far as I'm concerned, I'm done!
I am somewhat grateful that the Hartford Courant isn't owned by the same media conglomerate as the Greenwich Time. Hell, I've showed up in photos taken at Jim Himes fund raisers! Considering what they did to Sarah Darer Littman, they'd probably SHOOT me for my progressive tendencies! Forget a lousy "meet & greet"; I've produced and posted VIDEOS featuring the candidate!
Thankfully, the Hartford Courant appears to still embrace the idea that OPINION is exactly that!
UPDATE: Ed McKeon over at Caterwauled has some thoughts on my participation in this thing. I'm enjoying the discussion.
* * * * * * * * * * *
(*) These are the articles I've seen so far:
"Why McCain is Dreading the Debates"
"A Noun, A Verb, and the word Partisan"
"Czeching the facts"
"Brillant Moves"
(Note: the link above might not be permanent, so if you can't get there, go to the Courant Op Ed page and look for the "Connecticut Online" link in the list of articles)
So far it's been an interesting experience. I've seen at least four of my articles (*) reprinted in the Courant, although they are edited for space and lacking the videos and pictures, which I think tends to detract from the impact of my admittedly sophomoric writing. Hey, I'll be the first to admit that I depend heavily on off-beat videos and interesting images to make my point, but for the most part the articles they reprint are clear enough.
The timing of the Courant's introduction of this program was a bit disturbing, since it was shortly followed with their announcement of layoffs of reporters and staff. There's no question that this may be seen by some as a way for them to get free content to replace the output of their formerly paid employees. Believe me, the last thing I ever want to do is take food off of someone's table.
But for the most part, the inclusion of the blog excerpts is more like the "Letters to the Editor" section, which is also "free content" culled from the "masses". None of the bloggers are being paid for their content as far as I know. At least, I'm not, that's for sure.
I'm not writing anything FOR the Courant. Since I write first and only for my blog, if the Courant wants to reprint my work for distribution and they agree not to twist my words, I'm fine with it. It helps get my progressive opinions out there for more people to read. There are plenty of Republican blogs who are taking advantage of this program, and unless we want to let this information pathway be completely dominated by them, it's necessary to participate.
The major drawbacks of this program are 1) they select and edit the articles without my input. When I see them appear, that's when I know what they selected, and 2) none of my awesome video or images included. I've retained the option of opting out of the program at any time for any reason, but so far I'm fairly satisfied with it. I do have to watch myself that I don't start editing my writing to reflect what they'll use (like, do I need to use those three "fucks", or can I make my point with two "hecks" and a "darn"?)
If I ever start doing that, as far as I'm concerned, I'm done!
I am somewhat grateful that the Hartford Courant isn't owned by the same media conglomerate as the Greenwich Time. Hell, I've showed up in photos taken at Jim Himes fund raisers! Considering what they did to Sarah Darer Littman, they'd probably SHOOT me for my progressive tendencies! Forget a lousy "meet & greet"; I've produced and posted VIDEOS featuring the candidate!
Thankfully, the Hartford Courant appears to still embrace the idea that OPINION is exactly that!
UPDATE: Ed McKeon over at Caterwauled has some thoughts on my participation in this thing. I'm enjoying the discussion.
* * * * * * * * * * *
(*) These are the articles I've seen so far:
"Why McCain is Dreading the Debates"
"A Noun, A Verb, and the word Partisan"
"Czeching the facts"
"Brillant Moves"
Berlin panorama
Here's a link to a cool website that has an awesome panoramic photo of Barack Obama's Berlin speech from within the crowd. The hi-res photo on the website allows you to zoom in and pan 360 degrees. And it has natural sounds of the the people around the camera reacting to Obama's words.
One thing that's notable in the photo is the number of people holding digital cameras taking photos of the event. Everyone wants to record their own little historic moment, and Barack Obama speaking in Berlin is certainly that.
One thing that's notable in the photo is the number of people holding digital cameras taking photos of the event. Everyone wants to record their own little historic moment, and Barack Obama speaking in Berlin is certainly that.
Saturday, July 26, 2008
Dunster dives
Immediately following publication of an opinion piece she wrote for the Greenwich Time, columnist Sarah Darer Littman (also a published author and known for her progressive blog "Saramerica") was dropped from the paper on Thursday for having written a column critical of candidate Lee Whitnum while previously holding a "meet-and-greet" for Jim Himes last year.
According to Sarah, a representative from the paper said that having criticized Whitnum while supporting Jim Himes' campaign "compromised the integrity of the paper". (h/t Thomas Hooker, from whose article on My Left Nutmeg I generously harvested a lot, so go read it in it's entirety)
The fact that someone from the paper used the words "integrity" and "the paper" in the same sentence when referring to the Time is ironic at best. Consider that Sarah Littman's contract with GT and Stamford Advocate (owned by the same corporation, Media News Group, along with the Danbury News-Times and the Connecticut Post among others posted below) makes no mention of a prohibition against making political contributions, or holding a "meet-and-greet", nor did any member of the papers' managements ever stipulate that she could not.
In short, it appears that this was seized upon by the paper's right-wing management to get rid of her. Publisher John Dunster, 79, when responding to a complaint about Littman's liberal slant at a publicly broadcast event recently admitted that he was personally "on the conservative side of the spectrum", and said that he was going to make changes in the editorial page.
And considering that Littman was paid for OPINION and not REPORTING, there isn't much logic in firing her for expressing an opinion, unless the real reason is that it doesn't accurately reflect DUNSTER'S opinion.
Contrast that to the fact that political REPORTER Neil Vigdor's blatant soft reporting on Whitnum's wild statements is apparently in no way connected to his review printed in the front matter of Whitnum's novel "Hedge Fund Mistress" that, apparently (by way of a Lexis search), did not appear in the paper. Sarah certainly has disclosed her political support for Himes -- but Vigdor has never disclosed (to the public, at least) his relationship with Whitnum. (h/t MattW)
So, let's just be sure that we understand the Greenwich Time's editorial policies. If I'm seeing it correctly, it goes something like this:
It's all about the GT's dedicated efforts to reelect Chris Shays in the 4th CD this November.
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
FYI - From Media Newsgroup Corp's website; Connecticut newspapers they own:
Connecticut Post (Bridgeport)
Darien News (Darien)
Fairfield Citizen (Fairfield)
Greenwich Citizen (Greenwich)
Greenwich Time (Greenwich)
New Canaan News-Review (New Canaan)
Norwalk Citizen-News (Norwalk)
The Advocate (Stamford)
The News-Times (Danbury)
Westport News (Westport)
New Milford Spectrum (New Milford)
Let's get real.
This is a corporation that controls a lot of the flow of information in the 4th Congressional District. We can't let them entirely control the political dialog for us.
According to Sarah, a representative from the paper said that having criticized Whitnum while supporting Jim Himes' campaign "compromised the integrity of the paper". (h/t Thomas Hooker, from whose article on My Left Nutmeg I generously harvested a lot, so go read it in it's entirety)
The fact that someone from the paper used the words "integrity" and "the paper" in the same sentence when referring to the Time is ironic at best. Consider that Sarah Littman's contract with GT and Stamford Advocate (owned by the same corporation, Media News Group, along with the Danbury News-Times and the Connecticut Post among others posted below) makes no mention of a prohibition against making political contributions, or holding a "meet-and-greet", nor did any member of the papers' managements ever stipulate that she could not.
In short, it appears that this was seized upon by the paper's right-wing management to get rid of her. Publisher John Dunster, 79, when responding to a complaint about Littman's liberal slant at a publicly broadcast event recently admitted that he was personally "on the conservative side of the spectrum", and said that he was going to make changes in the editorial page.
And considering that Littman was paid for OPINION and not REPORTING, there isn't much logic in firing her for expressing an opinion, unless the real reason is that it doesn't accurately reflect DUNSTER'S opinion.
Contrast that to the fact that political REPORTER Neil Vigdor's blatant soft reporting on Whitnum's wild statements is apparently in no way connected to his review printed in the front matter of Whitnum's novel "Hedge Fund Mistress" that, apparently (by way of a Lexis search), did not appear in the paper. Sarah certainly has disclosed her political support for Himes -- but Vigdor has never disclosed (to the public, at least) his relationship with Whitnum. (h/t MattW)
So, let's just be sure that we understand the Greenwich Time's editorial policies. If I'm seeing it correctly, it goes something like this:
An opinion columnist can be fired if he or she supports a candidate in any way, shape, or form, and then writes an opinion about the candidate's race.Don't get me wrong on all of this...it's NOT about Lee Whitnum at all.
A political reporter is allegedly allowed to hide his professional relationship with a candidate to whom he is obviously sympathetic and then he fails to report anything negative about that person, despite the huge public record of their outrageous statements.
It's all about the GT's dedicated efforts to reelect Chris Shays in the 4th CD this November.
* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *
FYI - From Media Newsgroup Corp's website; Connecticut newspapers they own:
Connecticut Post (Bridgeport)
Darien News (Darien)
Fairfield Citizen (Fairfield)
Greenwich Citizen (Greenwich)
Greenwich Time (Greenwich)
New Canaan News-Review (New Canaan)
Norwalk Citizen-News (Norwalk)
The Advocate (Stamford)
The News-Times (Danbury)
Westport News (Westport)
New Milford Spectrum (New Milford)
Let's get real.
This is a corporation that controls a lot of the flow of information in the 4th Congressional District. We can't let them entirely control the political dialog for us.
Friday, July 25, 2008
No excuses
I'm easily amused.
There. I said it.
I have no excuse for enjoying this short video of John "Bill O'Reilly" McCain, but it does tickle the ol' funny bone.
And the fact is, it just seem SO in character for this guy. Especially considering what he calls his wife when he gets pissed off.
http://view.break.com/542113 - Watch more free videos
H/T to Crooks & Liars
There. I said it.
I have no excuse for enjoying this short video of John "Bill O'Reilly" McCain, but it does tickle the ol' funny bone.
And the fact is, it just seem SO in character for this guy. Especially considering what he calls his wife when he gets pissed off.
http://view.break.com/542113 - Watch more free videos
H/T to Crooks & Liars
Obama in Berlin
Another great speech from Barack Obama. Not only is it inspiring, but it's also a history lesson for many young people who might not be aware of the dramatic story of Berlin's stand against the threat of being overrun by the Communists.
I can't wait for Obama to visit Moscow someday, if only for the fun of being able to parody that great Beatles song:
Barack in the U.S.,
Barack in the U.S.,
Barack in the U.S.S.R.!
I can't wait for Obama to visit Moscow someday, if only for the fun of being able to parody that great Beatles song:
Barack in the U.S.,
Barack in the U.S.S.R.!
Thursday, July 24, 2008
Crawford prop ranch no longer needed
America's favorite phony cowboy, George W. Bush, will be ending his political career shortly when he leaves office for certain ignominy. As such, he'll no longer need the multi-million dollar prop that gave him "hick cred" when he successfully hoodwinked the American people (via the Supreme Court) into giving him the most important job in the world for eight years.
So he's selling that god-awful "ranch" and moving back to a more normal life, which for him would be that of any super-wealthy East Coast elitist, in a huge luxurious mansion with sprawling manicured lawns within a major metropolitan area. Because try as hard as he did, he could never quite scrub off the luster of extreme privilege and prep-school upbringing that's the hallmark of so many half-bright children of wealth who manage to coast through all the best schools because his pop-pop is a Senator.
However, retiring from politics won't make him any less stupid or incompetent. Indeed, we will be treated to the spectacle of him appearing at events like the Republican National Convention every four years, where they will grudgingly let him speak even though they'll be dreadfully embarrassed by him and his record.
So he's selling that god-awful "ranch" and moving back to a more normal life, which for him would be that of any super-wealthy East Coast elitist, in a huge luxurious mansion with sprawling manicured lawns within a major metropolitan area. Because try as hard as he did, he could never quite scrub off the luster of extreme privilege and prep-school upbringing that's the hallmark of so many half-bright children of wealth who manage to coast through all the best schools because his pop-pop is a Senator.
However, retiring from politics won't make him any less stupid or incompetent. Indeed, we will be treated to the spectacle of him appearing at events like the Republican National Convention every four years, where they will grudgingly let him speak even though they'll be dreadfully embarrassed by him and his record.
Paid interns needed
Tessa sent me this, and it's a great way for college kids to earn some money while learning to be activists.
Students: What's better than earning money to advocate for reproductive justice?
Hi undergrad and grad students,
If you attend any 2- or 4-year institution in CT, love reproductive rights/freedom/justice (choice, affordable birth control, comprehensive sex ed., safer sex, etc.), and want to learn even more about how to be an advocate and activist for reproductive justice, you should check out Planned Parenthood of CT's Campus Action Internship Program.
The basics (you actually get real money or course credit for this!):
* Attend monthly (fun! dynamic! interactive!) trainings in New Haven on organizing and activism and reproductive justice issues
* Do 5-10 hrs. per week on of events and event-planning on your campus
* Receive a stipend or course credit
* Hang out with rad interns from all over the state
* Learn even more skills you will need to be the next leader of the reproductive justice movement
* Have an awesome time
* Learn about the legislative process, why it matters and why you should care about it
* Teach your fellow interns and me about what YOU care about and WHY
MUCH MUCH MORE!
e-mail sally.tamarkin@ppct.org or call (203) 752-2863 for more info or to apply.
Tessa: I have worked with Sally Tamarkin on a few legislative action things and she is fun and an excellent boss.
Students: What's better than earning money to advocate for reproductive justice?
Hi undergrad and grad students,
If you attend any 2- or 4-year institution in CT, love reproductive rights/freedom/justice (choice, affordable birth control, comprehensive sex ed., safer sex, etc.), and want to learn even more about how to be an advocate and activist for reproductive justice, you should check out Planned Parenthood of CT's Campus Action Internship Program.
The basics (you actually get real money or course credit for this!):
* Attend monthly (fun! dynamic! interactive!) trainings in New Haven on organizing and activism and reproductive justice issues
* Do 5-10 hrs. per week on of events and event-planning on your campus
* Receive a stipend or course credit
* Hang out with rad interns from all over the state
* Learn even more skills you will need to be the next leader of the reproductive justice movement
* Have an awesome time
* Learn about the legislative process, why it matters and why you should care about it
* Teach your fellow interns and me about what YOU care about and WHY
MUCH MUCH MORE!
e-mail sally.tamarkin@ppct.org or call (203) 752-2863 for more info or to apply.
Tessa: I have worked with Sally Tamarkin on a few legislative action things and she is fun and an excellent boss.
Wednesday, July 23, 2008
Positively 4th Street
You got a lotta nerve
To say you are my friend
When I was down
You just stood there grinning
No, this isn't about that classic Bob Dylan song, although I'm sure there's some parallels here if you delve deep enough into the lyrics.
This is about a brand new blog, called "4th Street News", and featuring the mysterious "Anderson Scooper" as the blogmiester in residence.
This blog will showcase "The Hottest Race in the Northeast", the battle in the 4th CD featuring Jim Himes vs. Chris Shays. With a decidedly Himes bias.
Congrats on the new blog, Mr. Scooper! Now you get to experience the same nut-crushing pressure that I endure to post new and hopefully interesting content just about every single fucking day!
I'm sure you'll enjoy it.
Brilliant moves
There are two interesting news stories this morning that provide a fascinating contrast in what I call "brilliant moves".
Barack Obama continued his international tour with an important visit to Israel. Obama pledged Wednesday to maintain a close relationship between the United States and Israel.
And in a "brilliant move" that not only helps cement his relationship with American Jews, but also puts to rest the pejorative Neocon smear that he's a "closet Muslim", Obama began his second day in the Middle East on Wednesday by meeting Israeli leaders and laying a wreath at a Holocaust memorial.
The photo above is worth a million words in disabusing that hateful "Muslim" smear. I'm sure Rush Limbaugh ain't enjoying his corn flakes and codeine much this morning.
And in another "brilliant move", Sen. Joseph Lieberman is apparently doing his part to embrace the end times prophecies of some Christian theology by speaking to the followers of embattled preacher Rev. John Hagee, at a Christians United for Israel conference.
Many in the Jewish community have expressed distrust of Christians United for Israel, believing its members were only supporting Israel in their belief that an establishment of Zion is required before Jesus Christ can return.
Jews wouldn't have a part in that belief of salvation, unless they repent and convert to Christianity!
McCain has publicly disavowed Hagee for his anti-Catholic rhetoric and heinous remarks regarding Adolf Hitler. I would imagine that he sees little political gain in Lieberman sucking up to that hateful quack. I can't figure out if Lieberman truly believes this will help John McCain win in November, or if he is giving in to a pathological craving to go against anyone who advises him on how to comport himself. I'm guessing the latter.
Because Joe is a true independent. He apparently acts completely independent to rational thought and moral judgment. There's no higher authority in Lieberman's mind than Joe Lieberman.
Brilliant move, Joe.
Barack Obama continued his international tour with an important visit to Israel. Obama pledged Wednesday to maintain a close relationship between the United States and Israel.
And in a "brilliant move" that not only helps cement his relationship with American Jews, but also puts to rest the pejorative Neocon smear that he's a "closet Muslim", Obama began his second day in the Middle East on Wednesday by meeting Israeli leaders and laying a wreath at a Holocaust memorial.
The photo above is worth a million words in disabusing that hateful "Muslim" smear. I'm sure Rush Limbaugh ain't enjoying his corn flakes and codeine much this morning.
And in another "brilliant move", Sen. Joseph Lieberman is apparently doing his part to embrace the end times prophecies of some Christian theology by speaking to the followers of embattled preacher Rev. John Hagee, at a Christians United for Israel conference.
Many in the Jewish community have expressed distrust of Christians United for Israel, believing its members were only supporting Israel in their belief that an establishment of Zion is required before Jesus Christ can return.
Jews wouldn't have a part in that belief of salvation, unless they repent and convert to Christianity!
McCain has publicly disavowed Hagee for his anti-Catholic rhetoric and heinous remarks regarding Adolf Hitler. I would imagine that he sees little political gain in Lieberman sucking up to that hateful quack. I can't figure out if Lieberman truly believes this will help John McCain win in November, or if he is giving in to a pathological craving to go against anyone who advises him on how to comport himself. I'm guessing the latter.
Because Joe is a true independent. He apparently acts completely independent to rational thought and moral judgment. There's no higher authority in Lieberman's mind than Joe Lieberman.
Brilliant move, Joe.
Tuesday, July 22, 2008
Lieberman to speak at Rev. Hagee's conference
"So Pastor Hagee, Tells Us A Few Things About the Jews…"
Reposted from FireDogLake by Jane Hamsher, Tuesday July 22, 2008
Didja know that Jesus was Bar Mitzvahd? And that Jews of his time thought the spit of a first born male could heal the blind? That Hitler was a Jew? And that the Federal Reserve is controlled by Jews? (The Rothschilds, I've heard.)
I know because Joe Lieberman's BFF, John Hagee, says so.
"Moderate," "centrist," "independent" Joe Lieberman will speak at Hagee's conference tonight.
If this is centrist, what do these people consider extreme?
(h/t Glenn Greenwald)
Update: If you're having trouble viewing the video, you can see it here.
Reposted from FireDogLake by Jane Hamsher, Tuesday July 22, 2008
Didja know that Jesus was Bar Mitzvahd? And that Jews of his time thought the spit of a first born male could heal the blind? That Hitler was a Jew? And that the Federal Reserve is controlled by Jews? (The Rothschilds, I've heard.)
I know because Joe Lieberman's BFF, John Hagee, says so.
"Moderate," "centrist," "independent" Joe Lieberman will speak at Hagee's conference tonight.
If this is centrist, what do these people consider extreme?
(h/t Glenn Greenwald)
Update: If you're having trouble viewing the video, you can see it here.
Would Whitnum have talked with the Taliban?
More or less, anyway.
Hidden deep down in an article about Democratic candidate for the 4th CD Lee Whitnum's rant against just about every type of immigration (and I would imagine that Lee herself is 100% Choctaw Indian, since there's no way someone who is so dead set against immigration, legal or otherwise, could possibly have roots outside of North America) is a very disturbing statement by her.
From today's Connecticut Post:
So I'm sure they'd be absolutely willing to sit down with Lee over a nice cup of tea and have a polite and civil discussion about the merits improving the life of their citizens, expanding health care and literacy, and treating their women with the respect they deserve.
Then they'd chop her head off and have a jolly laugh about it afterwards.
I bring this up only because as much of a long shot Whitnum is, the only way people will realize what she's all about is if they get to SEE and HEAR the outrageous things she says.
We need to keep reminding people that while Iraq was a huge mistake, the invasion of Afghanistan was and will always be a necessary and justified response to the 9/11 attacks. The only reason we haven't attained victory there yet is because Bush/Cheney took so many resources out of Afghanistan to send to Iraq that we currently lack the required military capability to manage a successful operation there.
Our brave soldiers continue to die and our nation continues to borrow outrageous sums to fund the illegal war in Iraq (which we, and our children, will be paying back for generations), while Osama bin Laden is still walking around somewhere. Mission NOT Accomplished.
So Whitnum saying that invading Afghanistan was a "major mistake" is a clear indication of her political naiveté and reckless policy statements. If she somehow manages to get to Congress, she'll likely make her decisions based solely on emotions or whims.
Oh, and the article refers to Whitnum in the title as "Bridgeport candidate targets immigrants", when in fact Whitnum is from Greenwich. Kind of lousy fact-checking there, Conn Post.
Hidden deep down in an article about Democratic candidate for the 4th CD Lee Whitnum's rant against just about every type of immigration (and I would imagine that Lee herself is 100% Choctaw Indian, since there's no way someone who is so dead set against immigration, legal or otherwise, could possibly have roots outside of North America) is a very disturbing statement by her.
From today's Connecticut Post:
...I called Himes "part of the problem" in Middle East policy for actions including visiting Israel earlier this month. "We need an arms-length relationship with all allies," she said.OK, now, we all know how reasonable and receptive to new ideas the Taliban are. I hear they're big fans of the new Batman movie, and they especially enjoy the hip-hop stylings of Keyshia Cole. Those guys are nothing if not hip to pop culture!
I said that the United States made a major mistake by invading Afghanistan, failing to work with the Taliban to improve to life of its citizens... (emphasis mine)
So I'm sure they'd be absolutely willing to sit down with Lee over a nice cup of tea and have a polite and civil discussion about the merits improving the life of their citizens, expanding health care and literacy, and treating their women with the respect they deserve.
Then they'd chop her head off and have a jolly laugh about it afterwards.
I bring this up only because as much of a long shot Whitnum is, the only way people will realize what she's all about is if they get to SEE and HEAR the outrageous things she says.
We need to keep reminding people that while Iraq was a huge mistake, the invasion of Afghanistan was and will always be a necessary and justified response to the 9/11 attacks. The only reason we haven't attained victory there yet is because Bush/Cheney took so many resources out of Afghanistan to send to Iraq that we currently lack the required military capability to manage a successful operation there.
Our brave soldiers continue to die and our nation continues to borrow outrageous sums to fund the illegal war in Iraq (which we, and our children, will be paying back for generations), while Osama bin Laden is still walking around somewhere. Mission NOT Accomplished.
So Whitnum saying that invading Afghanistan was a "major mistake" is a clear indication of her political naiveté and reckless policy statements. If she somehow manages to get to Congress, she'll likely make her decisions based solely on emotions or whims.
Oh, and the article refers to Whitnum in the title as "Bridgeport candidate targets immigrants", when in fact Whitnum is from Greenwich. Kind of lousy fact-checking there, Conn Post.
Get ready for higher gas prices
Let's face facts.
Another blessed gift from God to the oil companies is hurtling towards the Gulf Coast right now.
A good hurricane is always cause for these guys to celebrate:
"Now I can afford to get even BIGGER
turkey-neck implants! Woo-hoo!"
Another blessed gift from God to the oil companies is hurtling towards the Gulf Coast right now.
McALLEN, Texas - Residents along the Texas-Mexico border kept a watchful eye on Tropical Storm Dolly on Monday, stocking up on plywood, generators and flashlights as forecasters predicted the storm would strengthen into a hurricane later this week and make landfall.Maybe I'm being a bit of an alarmist here, but just watch gas prices over the next two weeks. Regardless of the impact on our crude oil supply, we'll likely see the cost of already refined gasoline that's been in the supply line for months suddenly ratchet up.
[..]
Shell Oil said it was evacuating workers from oil rigs in the western Gulf Of Mexico...
[..]
Dolly was expected to make landfall Wednesday as a Category 1 storm with sustained winds of 74 mph to 95 mph.
A good hurricane is always cause for these guys to celebrate:
turkey-neck implants! Woo-hoo!"
Monday, July 21, 2008
Send Karl Rove to Jail dot com
Former Bush aide Karl Rove, aka "The Teflon Turd Blossom", may be headed to a heapin' helpin' of legal troubles if he continues with his refusal to comply with the subpoena and testify before Congress.
"Executive Privilege" ends when you leave the White House, if you're the President. Of course, Rove wasn't the President, or even an elected official. He worked as an adviser to Bush, and his only out will be if Bush gives him a pardon before they hold him in contempt of Congress and jail him.
Bush may use a bunch of pardons between now and January 2009, but there's one pardon that won't help him because it doesn't exist; the pardon that will exclude George W. Bush from prosecution after he leaves office.
A President can't pardon yourself.
http://sendkarlrovetojail.com/
"Executive Privilege" ends when you leave the White House, if you're the President. Of course, Rove wasn't the President, or even an elected official. He worked as an adviser to Bush, and his only out will be if Bush gives him a pardon before they hold him in contempt of Congress and jail him.
Bush may use a bunch of pardons between now and January 2009, but there's one pardon that won't help him because it doesn't exist; the pardon that will exclude George W. Bush from prosecution after he leaves office.
A President can't pardon yourself.
http://sendkarlrovetojail.com/
A Nation of Whiners
"We have sort of become a nation of whiners. You just hear this constant whining, complaining about a loss of competitiveness."Former Sen. Phil Gramm uttered those immortal (immoral?) words last week when referring to Americans who talk about our economic woes, and he was unceremoniously fired as the co-chair of John McCain's campaign. The campaign tried to downplay the termination during a Friday night news dump, which is typically used when people don't want their bad news to get the full attention of the MSM.
Fortunately, that's why we're here.
Bloggers work nights and weekends. Those are our favorite times, actually.
ConnecticutMan1 over at Drinking Liberally in New Milford has been busy dissecting the affair, and he's come to some startling conclusions about Gramm's firing, for which the "Nation of Whiners" comment may have only been a convenient justification. "Gramm is a vice-chairman of UBS Investment Bank." Interesting. Click on the link above and give it a read.
Still, having someone who has benefited greatly from our nation over the years, both personally and financially, and who used to be in a position of authority and power, to have him dismiss the very real suffering of Americans he was supposed to represent is both condescending and despicable.
The economy IS tanking, despite what this ridiculously wealthy old man says or wants you to believe. The hopeful disregard of the situation by people like Sen. Gramm won't solve the problem. We don't need to be told that there is no problem.
We need solutions. Solutions that start with people who are willing to face the hard realities and make bold moves to rebuild our broken economy.
Is that too much to ask of our elected leaders who inevitably become extremely wealthy as a result of the trust the American people show for them?
UPDATE: An absolutely unrelated note, this blog has quietly topped the 400,000 visit mark over the weekend. Thanks for stopping by!
Friday, July 18, 2008
"Future Leader" Jim Himes at Netroots Nation
Via My Left Nutmeg, h/t to the mysterious Scarce.
The Future Leader's panel: Some of the most exciting and competitive races of the 2008 election cycle feature some strong progressive candidates running in competitive districts. This panel will feature some of those challengers moderated by Brian Keeler.
This is the recorded version now instead of the livestream. The video takes about a minute and fifteen seconds to begin. Watch the little time counter on the video frame and be patient.
The Future Leader's panel: Some of the most exciting and competitive races of the 2008 election cycle feature some strong progressive candidates running in competitive districts. This panel will feature some of those challengers moderated by Brian Keeler.
This is the recorded version now instead of the livestream. The video takes about a minute and fifteen seconds to begin. Watch the little time counter on the video frame and be patient.
Harold Ford jeered at Netroots Nation
Former Congressman and DLC dweeb Harold Ford Jr. appeared at Netroots Nation today with Markos Moulitsas, and while discussing his former Fox News affiliation Ford was booed and jeered.
From The Raw Story:
Ford famously came to Connecticut back in February and publicly stated to a gathering at Fairfield University, "There is not a better Congressman in Washington than Chris Shays."
Either Harold Ford is completely tone deaf when it comes to the political climate in the districts he visits, or his time at Fox News has so thoroughly rotted his judgment to the point that he can only repeat Republican propaganda.
Jesus, Harold, maybe you should just stay home from now on.
From The Raw Story:
The meeting between two men at opposite ends of the Democratic spectrum was meant to address party unity, but the attitude of the crowd was less than welcoming to political centrist Harold Ford.Wait a minute! He fucking PRAISED Fox News?!? For WHAT? Is he completely insane?
Although both men agreed on the necessity of Democratic unity to elect Senator Barack Obama, the crowd showed that it was farther to the left than Ford after he praised FOX News.
During a question and answer with the audience, one man asked Ford why he was on television "smearing Democrats" if he sought party unity.Not only that, but some Democrats can't even be Democrats at all when visiting hotly contested districts where Republican congressmen and Bush apologists may be fighting desperately to try to beat true Democratic challengers.
"I no longer work for FOX News, I did for about a year," Ford said, which brought clapping from those in the audience who didn't wait for Ford to finish his sentence.
"And I have great respect and admiration for my former colleagues there," Ford said, drawing immediate jeers and shouts of "Why?"
Ford added that he now works for the NBC and MSNBC news networks.
[..]
"Harold will not applaud this, but in 2010 we’re going to have some Democrats we mean business to in some primaries," Moulitsas said, referring to Netroots activists who attempt to oust Democrats they dislike.
Ford countered this view by adding that some Democrats can't always be liberal in more conservative districts.
Ford famously came to Connecticut back in February and publicly stated to a gathering at Fairfield University, "There is not a better Congressman in Washington than Chris Shays."
Either Harold Ford is completely tone deaf when it comes to the political climate in the districts he visits, or his time at Fox News has so thoroughly rotted his judgment to the point that he can only repeat Republican propaganda.
Jesus, Harold, maybe you should just stay home from now on.
Honoring George W. Bush
From CNN.com:
SAN FRANCISCO, California (AP) -- A measure seeking to commemorate President Bush's years in office by slapping his name on a San Francisco sewage plant has qualified for the November ballot.Next, we have to start working on the Dick Cheney Memorial Toxic Waste Storage Facility.
The measure certified Thursday would rename the Oceanside Water Pollution Control Plant the George W. Bush Sewage Plant.
Supporters say the idea is to commemorate the mess they claim Bush has left behind by actions such as the war in Iraq.
Local Republicans say the plan stinks and they will oppose it.
Wednesday, July 16, 2008
Bush flip-flops on Iran
Yeah.
Suddenly, when it's politically expedient, George Bush decides to talk to Iran. After 5 years of rabid anti-Iranian rhetoric, NOW he wants to talk.
There's two reasons for this that I can see:
1) Bush is feeling the heat from a majority of Americans who prefer diplomacy to war, and finally he's listening to reason, or
2) Bush is opening talks so he can make outrageous demands on Iran only to get rebuffed, thereby giving himself the justification to attack. The talks may coincide with aggressive military maneuvers near Iran in the hopes that some lower level quick-fingered Iranian soldier will let a missile fly at the threat.
I'm hoping it's number one, but George Bush always seemed to be a number two in my opinion.
If I was a betting man, I'd think probably sometime in late September. Bush wouldn't want to mess up the coverage of the Republican convention. If we can get past late September and into mid-October, we'll probably be OK.
(Correction: apparently the Undersecretary of State's name isn't "Moley McBadMustache"...his name is actually "Mrs. Edna Schwartz")
Czeching the facts
John McCain is apparently doing everything possible to portray himself as a forgetful old codger. When the guy who hopes to become the leader of the free world can't seem to remember that "Czechoslovakia" hasn't existed by that name for fifteen years, you have to wonder about his ability to process and retain new information.
It's bad enough that the establishment of Slovakia and the Czech Republic seems to have escaped his notice, or at least it didn't make enough of an impression on his memory that he forgot about it. But to then make the SAME gaffe the very next day after being corrected almost seems like there's some kind of neurological condition at play inside McCain's skull.
From CNN.com:
“And I regret some of the recent behavior Russia that has exhibited, and I’ll be glad to talk about that later on including reduction in oil supplies to Czechoslovakia after they agreed with us on a missile defense system, etcetera,” said the presumptive Republican nominee at a New Mexico town hall Tuesday.And then, if that's not troubling enough, later that evening, McCain’s campaign sent reporters a statement on the issue, which quoted the Arizona senator calling the nation “the Czech Republic” twice!
More than fifteen years ago, Czechoslovakia officially split into two nations – the Czech Republic and Slovakia.
On Monday, the Arizona senator made virtually the same statement about recent Russian moves that troubled him, citing that country’s attempt to reduce “the energy supplies to Czechoslovakia.”
Now they're covering up McCain's mistakes for him! Is this a harbinger of the sort of lies we'll see emanating from the McCain White House if he's elected?
And then there's THIS famous gaffe, where McCain is so obviously consumed by the idea that al-Qaeda is hiding behind every tree and bush, he misspeaks so badly that Sen. Lieberman needed to correct him in the middle of a talk to the media.
Well, it’s common knowledge and has been reported in the media that Al Qaeda is going back into Iran and receiving training and are coming back into Iraq from Iran. That’s well known. And it’s unfortunate.”
It was not until he got a whispered correction from Senator Joseph I. Lieberman of Connecticut, who was traveling with Mr. McCain on the trip, which is a Congressional delegation, that Mr. McCain corrected himself.
“I’m sorry, the Iranians are training extremists, not Al Qaeda,” he said.
Oh yeah. THIS is definitely the guy we want running things. Sure.
Tuesday, July 15, 2008
Never Mind The Bollocks
From Colin McEnroe's To Wit (July 3rd):
I have to say that my inner anarchist is thrilled by the comparison; but my outer middle-aged blogger in desperate need of content sees this as simply an opportunity to have a little fun with Photoshop.
Without further ado, ladies and gentlemen, it's the Blog Pistols!
(Filthy lucre? Oh we fairly reek of filthy lucre!)
"Here's the Blog Pistols. The 'sphere is a lot like punk. Its aesthetic explicitly rejects shine and polish and high skill. It prizes rawness and improvisation and poor impulse control. See Daily Kos for details. The whole idea was to overthrow all the values of the mainstream media. And spit on them and kick them..."Wow. Thanks Colin.
"(CT) Bob and Spaze(boy) are not great video editors, but BECAUSE of that, they were, at least at one time, the Johnny Rotten and Sid Vicious of the CT 'sphere. When I suggested using Spazeboy as a freelancer, I was thinking of the time he chased Joe Lieberman down a stairwell, filming the whole thing...That was appalling journalism, but it was great blogging. Rawness, rudeness, impudence, combativeness. These are, in McLuhan terms, the message of the blogosphere and internet...."
I have to say that my inner anarchist is thrilled by the comparison; but my outer middle-aged blogger in desperate need of content sees this as simply an opportunity to have a little fun with Photoshop.
Without further ado, ladies and gentlemen, it's the Blog Pistols!
(Filthy lucre? Oh we fairly reek of filthy lucre!)
Jim Himes at the Puerto Rican Day Parade
Jim Himes marched proudly in the Puerto Rican Day Parade in Bridgeport on Sunday, and from the look of the pictures, he and everyone there was having a great time!
The "Himes Float" was a big hit, with plenty of cheers from the viewers as it rolled down the parade route.
Jim greeting people all along the way. The pride in their heritage really shows through in these photos.
Jim was born in Peru to American parents, and lived much of his childhood among Spanish-speaking peoples. It must have felt a little like seeing long-time cousins.
It's great to see someone having such a good time at what some other politicians might consider to be a political chore. He's obviously enjoying meeting people and taking part in the festivities.
All of the day's photos are viewable in a slideshow here!
The "Himes Float" was a big hit, with plenty of cheers from the viewers as it rolled down the parade route.
Jim greeting people all along the way. The pride in their heritage really shows through in these photos.
Jim was born in Peru to American parents, and lived much of his childhood among Spanish-speaking peoples. It must have felt a little like seeing long-time cousins.
It's great to see someone having such a good time at what some other politicians might consider to be a political chore. He's obviously enjoying meeting people and taking part in the festivities.
All of the day's photos are viewable in a slideshow here!
Monday, July 14, 2008
Lieberman isn't fooling anybody
From Christine Stuart at CT News Junkie:
Perhaps he's indulging in a little political grandstanding at the expense of Sen. McCain's widely stated position of being against all earmarks.
Hmmm...I wonder where I've heard THAT excuse before?
Oh yes, it was our own Speaker of the House, Jim Amman, who said he didn't support Ned Lamont after he won the primary; not because he disagreed with Lamont's stance on any particular issue, but because he didn't "know anything" about him.
It seems to me that people like Amann and Lieberman are shirking their responsibilities when they don't bother to find out the slightest things about the candidates in their own state. Hey guys, we're PAYING you to figure out some things about the candidates before you decide who you're going to endorse. We're NOT paying you to play favorites based on political favors owed, or that mousy "he's my friend" bullshit that we hear all too often in politics as an excuse for going against your constituent's wishes.
If your precious friendship is so important, join a bowling league together or play cribbage one night a week. But we expect you to make your decisions based on cold hard facts rather than personal loyalties. I'd equally hate the idea of a judge making a legal decision based on the fact that the prosecutor is his golfing buddy. This is no difference in my opinion. Politicians need to stop abdicating their duties and make it their business to know what the candidates are all about before they endorse one of them.
Fortunately for everyone, come early next year Lieberman will be unceremoniously dumped out the door from his Homeland Security Committee chair, and when he walks across the hall he'll find the Republicans have rolled up their welcome mat.
Politics "Joe's way" ain't pretty.
UPDATE - New video of Joe's smirky remarks, from Christine Stuart:
Before heading to Bridgeport Monday, U.S. Sen. Joseph Lieberman stopped at Our Piece of the Pie in Hartford to talk about a $200,000 earmark the nonprofit social service agency will be receiving this year. After a brief tour of the facility on Sargent Street, Lieberman agreed to answer some general questions from the media.Did Lieberman happen to mention if he agrees with his buddy John McCain's hard line stance on ending ALL earmarks if he wins in November? Is Lieberman against earmarks too? If he is, why is he openly embracing this particular earmark?
Perhaps he's indulging in a little political grandstanding at the expense of Sen. McCain's widely stated position of being against all earmarks.
Asked who the independent-minded senator would be supporting in the 4th District race between Republican incumbent Chris Shays and Democrat Jim Himes, Lieberman said, “I haven’t made a decision.” But he added, “I would be less than direct if I didn’t say Congressman Shays and I have worked very closely over the years. We’re very close friends … I just think he’s a great person and a great Congressman.”We know that, Joe. You're very particular in that you only kiss Republicans.
“I don’t know Jim Himes very well,” he said. “I’m sure a lot of Democratic candidates aren’t hankering for my endorsements from me in Democratic primaries perhaps they’ll be happy for it in the general election.”"I don’t know Jim Himes very well..."
Hmmm...I wonder where I've heard THAT excuse before?
Oh yes, it was our own Speaker of the House, Jim Amman, who said he didn't support Ned Lamont after he won the primary; not because he disagreed with Lamont's stance on any particular issue, but because he didn't "know anything" about him.
It seems to me that people like Amann and Lieberman are shirking their responsibilities when they don't bother to find out the slightest things about the candidates in their own state. Hey guys, we're PAYING you to figure out some things about the candidates before you decide who you're going to endorse. We're NOT paying you to play favorites based on political favors owed, or that mousy "he's my friend" bullshit that we hear all too often in politics as an excuse for going against your constituent's wishes.
If your precious friendship is so important, join a bowling league together or play cribbage one night a week. But we expect you to make your decisions based on cold hard facts rather than personal loyalties. I'd equally hate the idea of a judge making a legal decision based on the fact that the prosecutor is his golfing buddy. This is no difference in my opinion. Politicians need to stop abdicating their duties and make it their business to know what the candidates are all about before they endorse one of them.
Lieberman went on to talk about why he continues to caucus with Democrats and touched on his position in presidential politics. He did not reveal whether he would speak at the Republican National Convention on behalf of the Republican presidential nominee, U.S. Sen. John McCain.Oh, he's SO going to speak at the Republican convention! Don't even kid yourselves about that. He's playing the Democratic side of the fence ONLY so that when he does pull his inevitable "Zell Miller" routine, he'll have more credibility with the media and low-information voters because he can claim to be the pretend Democrat that he acts like.
Fortunately for everyone, come early next year Lieberman will be unceremoniously dumped out the door from his Homeland Security Committee chair, and when he walks across the hall he'll find the Republicans have rolled up their welcome mat.
Politics "Joe's way" ain't pretty.
UPDATE - New video of Joe's smirky remarks, from Christine Stuart:
Saturday, July 12, 2008
Jim Himes Listening and Leading Tour
This is your opportunity to meet and talk to Jim Himes. There are going to be fifteen more similar appearance over the next two weeks. Here's this weekend's schedule:
WHO: Jim Himes, Democratic candidate for Congress
WHAT: "Listening and Leading Tour"
WHERE AND WHEN:
Darien:
Saturday, 7/12, 12 PM
St. Paul's Church, 471 Mansfield Avenue, Darien, CT 06820
New Canaan:
Sunday, 7/13, 3 PM
New Canaan High School, Wagner Room, 11 Farm Road, New Canaan, CT 06840
WHO: Jim Himes, Democratic candidate for Congress
WHAT: "Listening and Leading Tour"
WHERE AND WHEN:
Darien:
Saturday, 7/12, 12 PM
St. Paul's Church, 471 Mansfield Avenue, Darien, CT 06820
New Canaan:
Sunday, 7/13, 3 PM
New Canaan High School, Wagner Room, 11 Farm Road, New Canaan, CT 06840
Friday, July 11, 2008
Dodd being considered for VP nod
Sen. Chris Dodd is admittedly a long shot candidate to be on Obama's ticket, but it's kind of fun to speculate. The story below along with the video is reprinted from CT News Junkie.
However, with Rell's power to appoint a successor to serve the following two years of Dodd's six-year senate term, it doesn't look like a good idea. Dodd should stay where he is for the next two years, but after the 2010 mid-term election where his seat will be up for grabs, THAT would be a good time for Barack Obama to put Dodd's skills and experience to use.
But here we have Dick Blumenthal, the state's Attorney General, sharing the stage with Susan Bysiewicz as some event in the capitol.
And what's with Dick Blumenthal hesitating to make a decision about Lieberman's potential ouster from the Homeland Security Chair?
Wishy, please meet washy. His name is Dick Blumenthal.
However, with Rell's power to appoint a successor to serve the following two years of Dodd's six-year senate term, it doesn't look like a good idea. Dodd should stay where he is for the next two years, but after the 2010 mid-term election where his seat will be up for grabs, THAT would be a good time for Barack Obama to put Dodd's skills and experience to use.
But here we have Dick Blumenthal, the state's Attorney General, sharing the stage with Susan Bysiewicz as some event in the capitol.
And what's with Dick Blumenthal hesitating to make a decision about Lieberman's potential ouster from the Homeland Security Chair?
Attorney General Richard Blumenthal, a supporter of Sen. Hillary Clinton’s bid for the presidency, said Friday at a press conference that if he was advising Sen. Barack Obama, he “would urge him to make Chris Dodd his vice president.”Yechh. What kind of true Democrat wouldn't have any opinion about Joe "Bomb the fuckers" Lieberman's status in an important Democratically-controlled position?
The Associated Press has reported that Obama’s presidential campaign has requested information from Dodd as part of its search for a possible vice presidential candidate.
“In Connecticut we have a saying, ‘In Dodd We Trust,’” Blumenthal said.
Asked if he would be interested in running for Dodd’s U.S. Senate seat, Blumenthal said, “Of course I have an interest in the senate seat.” Blumenthal then explain that he doesn’t think the Countrywide mortgage issue that has dogged Dodd in recent weeks should be anything more than a “minute blip” on any national candidate’s resume.
As for talk of stripping Sen. Joseph Lieberman of his chairmanship, Blumenthal at first hesitated to answer the question. When pressed again, Blumenthal said he regards Lieberman “as a genuine, personal friend,” adding that he is “not going to issue a judgment.” He said that decision is up to leadership in the U.S. Senate.
Secretary of State Susan Bysiewicz said Friday at the same press conference that she would be interested in the running for Attorney General or Governor, depending on what the landscape looks like.
Wishy, please meet washy. His name is Dick Blumenthal.
"Iraq is not a labor issue"
Rep. Chris Shays, at the AFL-CIO convention on June 23rd, as reported by PPW.com:
Well, besides the obvious intentional neglect of the facts, such as Shays' and Lieberman's extensive voting record on the wrong side of MANY other important issues, the fact remains that Iraq it isn't "just one issue"...
It's THE issue of our time!
Only somebody with extremely limited cognitive reasoning abilities would believe that borrowing astronomical sums of money from China to finance a disastrous war so the administration can give it's powerful backers their coveted tax breaks at the cost of mortgaging our nation's future is a good and wise thing for our country.
You'd have to either be insane, or in a clinical state of denial and self-delusion to reach that conclusion.
So, when faced with a question about his stance on Iraq, Chris Shays responded as only someone whose brittle hold on reality is threatened; and rather than address the issue in a sane and coherent manner, he instead basically accuses the person of asking an inappropriate question.
This response is very telling. And it leads to the possible conclusion that either Chris Shays is either suffering from self-delusion, or he knows what exactly what he's been doing and he's willing to continue with it at any cost to the nation rather than admit his mistake.
Either way, it's obvious that in order to stop the damage that Shays is a willing party to, we have to elect Jim Himes in November.
A heated debate took place over the endorsement of Jim Himes, a pro-labor, antiwar Democrat challenging incumbent Republican Chris Shays (4th Congressional District), a leading proponent of Bush’s Iraq war policies. Shays was the only representative from Connecticut to vote for additional funding of the war last month. He had angered the endorsement committee during an interview in which he objected to a question on the war, saying, “Why are you asking me about that? That’s not a labor issue.”This is what the Republicans would like you to believe. I don't know how many times I've heard apologists for people like Joe Lieberman or Chris Shays say something like, "well, he votes the right way on most things except Iraq, but that's only ONE issue".
Well, besides the obvious intentional neglect of the facts, such as Shays' and Lieberman's extensive voting record on the wrong side of MANY other important issues, the fact remains that Iraq it isn't "just one issue"...
It's THE issue of our time!
Only somebody with extremely limited cognitive reasoning abilities would believe that borrowing astronomical sums of money from China to finance a disastrous war so the administration can give it's powerful backers their coveted tax breaks at the cost of mortgaging our nation's future is a good and wise thing for our country.
You'd have to either be insane, or in a clinical state of denial and self-delusion to reach that conclusion.
So, when faced with a question about his stance on Iraq, Chris Shays responded as only someone whose brittle hold on reality is threatened; and rather than address the issue in a sane and coherent manner, he instead basically accuses the person of asking an inappropriate question.
This response is very telling. And it leads to the possible conclusion that either Chris Shays is either suffering from self-delusion, or he knows what exactly what he's been doing and he's willing to continue with it at any cost to the nation rather than admit his mistake.
Either way, it's obvious that in order to stop the damage that Shays is a willing party to, we have to elect Jim Himes in November.
"I am so proud to have won the endorsement of the Connecticut AFL-CIO, which represents over two hundred thousand workers who know that we desperately need a change in Washington," said Mr. Himes. "AFL-CIO members know that I will be there for them on the issues that matter, like achieving universal health care, creating new jobs, strengthening our schools and ending the war in Iraq."
Impeachment back on the table?
"...and will to the best of my Ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States."
- from the Oath of Office of the President of the United States of Amerca
George W. Bush's failure to live up to this simple oath is one of the reasons Rep. Dennis Kucinich introduced a single article of impeachment in the House this week, accusing him of deceiving Congress to convince lawmakers to authorize his invasion of Iraq more than five years ago.
The video is a little hard to hear, but the first minute or two has most of the good stuff in it.
Kucinich, who originally had a 35-article impeachment resolution, decided that a single article would be easier for Congress to deal with, and will essentially do what the 35-count charge would do. The point of which, if you haven't been paying attention, is NOT to remove the President from office. It's too late in his term to expect any possibility of that happening with the inevitably slow machinations of the impeachment process.
No, what the impeachment process does is give Congress the power of the subpoena and the ability to compel the President and his men to testify under oath. The threat of perjury charges will serve to reveal the truth about the crimes that have been committed in the White House during and after the long run up to the war, and it will lay the groundwork for future criminal prosecutions of the parties responsible for lying to the American people and betraying the Constitution.
House Speaker Nancy Pelosi yesterday discussed the impeachment article, and I am stunned to hear this from her:
Is she really saying that she might not encourage the Judiciary Committee to sit on their hands in regards to impeachment? Yes Virginia, there IS a Santa Claus, and he just brought you a table for you to set your impeachment upon!
True, it's a tiny little rickety card table with short legs and barely enough room for you to play a nice game of Scrabble upon, but it's a table all the same. A big sturdy mahogany conference room table with plenty of room for the committee members to spread out all the papers needed to enact the impeachment inquiry would be better, but I'll settle for what we got.
Who knows? Maybe it's all just a load of bunk, and all Nance is doing is throwing a bone to us (and by "us", I mean "Constitution-loving American Patriots") and she'll do nothing more to move this thing along. We'll have to wait and see what happens next.
- from the Oath of Office of the President of the United States of Amerca
George W. Bush's failure to live up to this simple oath is one of the reasons Rep. Dennis Kucinich introduced a single article of impeachment in the House this week, accusing him of deceiving Congress to convince lawmakers to authorize his invasion of Iraq more than five years ago.
The video is a little hard to hear, but the first minute or two has most of the good stuff in it.
Kucinich, who originally had a 35-article impeachment resolution, decided that a single article would be easier for Congress to deal with, and will essentially do what the 35-count charge would do. The point of which, if you haven't been paying attention, is NOT to remove the President from office. It's too late in his term to expect any possibility of that happening with the inevitably slow machinations of the impeachment process.
No, what the impeachment process does is give Congress the power of the subpoena and the ability to compel the President and his men to testify under oath. The threat of perjury charges will serve to reveal the truth about the crimes that have been committed in the White House during and after the long run up to the war, and it will lay the groundwork for future criminal prosecutions of the parties responsible for lying to the American people and betraying the Constitution.
House Speaker Nancy Pelosi yesterday discussed the impeachment article, and I am stunned to hear this from her:
"This is a Judiciary Committee matter, and I believe we will see some attention being paid to it by the Judiciary Committee," Pelosi told reporters. "Not necessarily taking up the articles of impeachment because that would have to be approved on the floor, but to have some hearings on the subject."Great Caesar's Ghost! Could it be that Ms. Pelosi has actually begun to develop a spine?
Pelosi added: "My expectation is that there will be some review of that in the committee."
Is she really saying that she might not encourage the Judiciary Committee to sit on their hands in regards to impeachment? Yes Virginia, there IS a Santa Claus, and he just brought you a table for you to set your impeachment upon!
True, it's a tiny little rickety card table with short legs and barely enough room for you to play a nice game of Scrabble upon, but it's a table all the same. A big sturdy mahogany conference room table with plenty of room for the committee members to spread out all the papers needed to enact the impeachment inquiry would be better, but I'll settle for what we got.
Who knows? Maybe it's all just a load of bunk, and all Nance is doing is throwing a bone to us (and by "us", I mean "Constitution-loving American Patriots") and she'll do nothing more to move this thing along. We'll have to wait and see what happens next.
Wednesday, July 09, 2008
The Senator is Back!
It was really good to see Sen. Kennedy back in his beloved Senate today (pictured above with Barack Obama in Hartford, February 2008).
From the AP, via Yahoo News:
WASHINGTON - Massachusetts Sen. Edward M. Kennedy, battling a brain tumor, walked through a wall of applause and into the Senate on Wednesday and cast a dramatic, decisive vote on long-stalled Medicare legislation.Sen. Kennedy came to DC right after his daily treatment, and left soon after his vote to return home to continue his treatments. Our thoughts continue to be with Ted in his gallant fight!
"Aye," the 76-year-old Kennedy said in a loud voice, smiling broadly and making a thumbs-up gesture as he registered his vote.
Spectators in the galleries that overhang the chamber burst into cheers — a violation of decorum that drew no complaints.
"It's great to be back. I love this place," he said after his brief visit.
Telecoms win, America loses
I'm disappointed about this, but not terribly surprised.
The Senate, by a 69-28 vote, sent the House bill for the FISA overhaul to President Bush's desk, where he'll probably have to restrain himself from giggling uncontrollably while he signs it with his child-like scrawl.
The bill includes complete immunity for crimes that the giant telecommunications corporations MAY have committed in their mindless rush to serve our lord and master's every whim and desire, regardless of the letter of the law. We'll never know for sure what crimes they may have committed, the details of the widespread nature of the surveillance, or indeed, the actual chain of command the orders came down for them to spy on all of us.
Very few people, especially the uncritical media, seem to grasp why telecom immunity is a terribly bad thing.
Nobody really gives a crap about punishing the telecoms. What would have come out of any investigation would have been countless hours of testimony from telecom executives about the way they were illegally pressured into spying on Americans, and the extent of the spying. The testimony would have eventually been used to put members of the Bush administration on trail in the coming years.
That won't happen now, at least as far as any telecom angle goes. And regardless of what fixes to this flawed FISA act we'll see made next year when we'll have a Democratic President and a vigorous majority in Congress, once you give immunity you can't take it back.
It's a done deal. Bush and Friends managed to squeak through yet another in an endless series of close calls. They really are the Teflon Administration, apparently.
Sen. Barack Obama voted for the bill, despite his campaign promises to the opposite. Again, this troubles me somewhat, but doesn't surprise me very much. I've never considered Obama to be a true a progressive candidate, and I have a feeling we'll see his presidency resemble Bill Clinton's conservative-Democratic administration to a large extent. I know that right now within the lefty blogosphere there is much wailing and gnashing of teeth about Obama's vote, but I'm willing to accept the fact that NO candidate is going to please "all of the progressives, all of the time".
Of course, no matter what Obama does while in office, it won't come close to approaching the massive crap-storm that will rain down on our nation should John Sidney McCain somehow manage to slither on his mottled belly into the Oval Office.
I can come to terms with the fact that Obama needed to vote for the FISA bill even with that toxic immunity pill included, or else he'd give McCain more ammunition to claim that he's "soft on terrorism" or some such bullshit. Listen, it was a 69-28 vote. His vote was totally meaningless. I can see if it was 49-48 and his was the deciding vote and he voted that way; of COURSE we would be righteously pissed. But his vote turned out to be largely symbolic, and if it helps get him some more votes in important swing states, then so be it.
So, all you voters out there who are angry about this, try not to forget the importance of putting a Democrat, even a slightly imperfect one, into the White House this November. It's the only way we'll see ANY chance of the Constitution being put back in effect.
The Rush to War, Part II
The warhawks are rallying yet again, this time in an effort to provoke a war with Iran. One that will likely benefit both corporate interests and the Republican Party, which knows nothing stirs up patriotic fervor like a war that coincides with a national election.
This week, Bush administration officials rattled their sabers in response to Iran's test firing of several long- and medium-range missiles.
Gee, I wonder why Iran would feel the need to defend itself from potential American aggression?
The worst part is how the assembled media laughed at McCain's horrendous statement.
Here's a candidate who has a good chance of becoming the next president of the United States, and he jokes about bombing Iran and killing Iranians. He's a staunch warhawk who also believes that preemptive war is a sound and reasonable policy. Additionally, he happily envisions occupying Iraq for at least a century.
Is it any wonder that the Iranians fear for their lives and their nation?
This week, Bush administration officials rattled their sabers in response to Iran's test firing of several long- and medium-range missiles.
Gee, I wonder why Iran would feel the need to defend itself from potential American aggression?
The worst part is how the assembled media laughed at McCain's horrendous statement.
Here's a candidate who has a good chance of becoming the next president of the United States, and he jokes about bombing Iran and killing Iranians. He's a staunch warhawk who also believes that preemptive war is a sound and reasonable policy. Additionally, he happily envisions occupying Iraq for at least a century.
Is it any wonder that the Iranians fear for their lives and their nation?
Tuesday, July 08, 2008
Capacity crowd
I don't think Barack will have any problem whatsoever filling the stadium.
From The Boston Globe:
This August in Denver, when Barack Obama sets an historical precedent and accepts the Democratic nomination for president, I think it'll be a very tough ticket to get, even though the stadium easily seats 75,000 people.
From The Boston Globe:
Yesterday, the Democratic Party announced that Obama will deliver his speech at the Democratic National Convention on Aug. 28 in Denver's INVESCO Field, the Denver Broncos' stadium, instead of the smaller indoor arena that will house the rest of the festivities.In case anyone forgot, here is a NY Times photo of an Obama rally on the eve of the Oregon primary. You know, back when there were TWO hugely popular Democratic candidates in the race.
The move will give Obama a potent visual in a crucial swing state this fall: a sea of some 75,000 fans, packed into an outdoor football stadium, screaming for their November hopeful.
This August in Denver, when Barack Obama sets an historical precedent and accepts the Democratic nomination for president, I think it'll be a very tough ticket to get, even though the stadium easily seats 75,000 people.
Monday, July 07, 2008
A brand new video!
It's been a few weeks since I made a video, and I was jonesing for a chance to do something new.
After getting all my catching up for work done by early afternoon, I realized that I'd be able to make it down to Norwalk in time to catch the Bush Legacy Bus. So I tossed my camera in the car and arrived at the Silver Star Diner a little before the bus.
You might recognize some familiar faces here; it was very good to see some old friends. I had a lot of fun making this video!
After getting all my catching up for work done by early afternoon, I realized that I'd be able to make it down to Norwalk in time to catch the Bush Legacy Bus. So I tossed my camera in the car and arrived at the Silver Star Diner a little before the bus.
You might recognize some familiar faces here; it was very good to see some old friends. I had a lot of fun making this video!
Bush Legacy Bus stops in Norwalk today
Apparently there's some kind of traveling museum of Bush's failures of leadership that's touring the nation, and today (Monday, July 7th) at 3:30PM it makes a stop at the Silver Star Diner in Norwalk (210 Connecticut Ave.)
The Bush Legacy Tour Bus, sponsored by Americans United for Change, houses exhibits on eight of the most defining issues of George W. Bush's presidency:
* Iraq
* The Economy
* The Environment
* Health Care
* Labor
* Katrina
* Education
* The Progressive Vision
The organizers hope to reach over 100,000 Americans with it's important message of George Bush's and the entire conservative wing's colossal failure of leadership. Check it out if you can.
The Bush Legacy Tour Bus, sponsored by Americans United for Change, houses exhibits on eight of the most defining issues of George W. Bush's presidency:
* Iraq
* The Economy
* The Environment
* Health Care
* Labor
* Katrina
* Education
* The Progressive Vision
The organizers hope to reach over 100,000 Americans with it's important message of George Bush's and the entire conservative wing's colossal failure of leadership. Check it out if you can.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)