Tuesday, October 21, 2008

Shays: Partisan "when it counts"

There's a little game that some crafty politicians play.

It's called "Looking Like a Good Guy".

You play it by finding bills that are likely to be overwhelmingly won or lost. It doesn't matter which. Then you vote with the other party with your largely meaningless vote, because the bill didn't need your vote to pass, or it would have lost regardless.

Then, when you campaign in your largely Democratic district, you can show those meaningless votes as proof you "step across party lines" to work with the other party.

Here's the critical part: you need to vote with your party on the close votes nearly ALL of the time. Because if you betray your party when they really need your help, you won't get their help (and money) when you run for reelection. So you stick with your party with a nearly perfect voting record when it's close.

If you play the game well, you can have it "both ways".

And when it comes to playing this game, "Both Ways" Shays is approaching "Grand Master" status.

From HimesForCongress.com:
On the closest votes—when his vote has the most power to affect the outcome, when the Republican Party most needs his support, and when 4th District residents most need him to make the right choice—Shays has lined up behind his Party’s leadership 89% of the time, or nine out of ten times.

This finding—based on analysis of the 1,752 votes cast in the 110th Congress—shows that Shays is not “purple” as he claims, but is, in fact, a true Republican partisan. Real political courage doesn’t mean crossing the aisle when it’s safe and easy; it means exercising independent judgment on the close votes where your decision can really make a difference.
Let's remember that there is one candidate who won't play games. His name is Jim Himes, and he's running for Congress in the 4th CD.

9 comments:

imran said...

Hello Dear and Respected,
I hope you are fine and carrying on the great work you have been doing for the Internet surfers. I am Ghazala Khan from The Pakistani Spectator (TPS), We at TPS throw a candid look on everything happening in and for Pakistan in the world. We are trying to contribute our humble share in the web sphere. Our aim is to foster peace, progress and harmony with passion.

We at TPS are carrying out a new series of interviews with the notable passionate bloggers, writers, and webmasters. In that regard, we would like to interview you, if you don't mind. Please send us your approval for your interview at my email address "ghazala.khi at gmail.com", so that I could send you the Interview questions. We would be extremely grateful.

Regards,

Ghazala Khan
The Pakistani Spectator
http://www.pakspectator.com

paul said...

What if your blog could influence the elections in the last run?
What if, through your posts, your readers could get involved in the last run for the Presidential elections and bring help to the candidates on their strategic issues…Right People for the President can do that for your blog. It’s new, it’s easy and fun, and it’s free.
With a simple copy-and-paste procedure, you will include Right People for the President in your blog, and give your readers a new voice, enabling them to help the candidates on relevant campaign issues. Everyone can contribute, everyone could be “the right person” for the future President.
A contribution, a photo, and here your blog becomes a new source of ideas, with suggestions that may very well be useful to the candidates. Choose for your blog a dedicated player, focusing on one specific candidate, or choose our “Random player” with either candidate, changing on each reload of your pages.
There is room for amusing contributions – perfect for creating a friendly atmosphere around your posts – and more serious ones. The best ideas coming from your blog will be forwarded to the candidates. A real solution, brought forward by one of your readers, may shape the future of politics. Should a candidate reach out to one of your contributors, you may be associated in their meeting.
Right People for the President means more readers, spending longer time on your blog.
Right People for the President is fun, spontaneous, and involving. For your blog, it means more visitors, spending more reading time on your pages, returning more frequently to read new stories or to vote for their favorite ones.
Right People for the President is viral, with readers inviting their friends to have a look at the player on your blog or to vote for their contribution, bringing you new visitors. Interesting and popular suggestions from your readers will be there to initiate a buzz around your blog.
Include Right People for the President on your blog in just 2 minutes
In a few clicks:
1. choose a dedicated player, focusing on either B.Obama or J.McCain, or our “random player”,
2. choose between our standard size or our column size, perfect for sidebars,
3. copy and paste the player’s code in your blog
All details here: http://www.rightpeopleforthepresident.com
The Right People Team

Anonymous said...

interesting read http://news.yahoo.com/s/politico/20081022/pl_politico/14829

Anonymous said...
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
CT Bob said...

I think I'm getting to the GOPers.

Bob Symmes said...

I managed to read the deleted message this morning...I almost asked if you had an asshole magnet surreptitiously attached to your blog... the first two are strange, too (almost like Nigerian scams; but I've no time to check their spots).

On the presidential ballots: only (a) non-registered town residents, and (b) FORMER town residents can cast Presidential ballots in a town. So far, the only proof for former residents we have is prior voter registration. current non-registered voters can show Photo ID, or a current utility bill (w/town address) to vote. Registered voters MUST vote at their poll.

BUT...there is no system for BOB ADAMS to vote in Milford, then show up in West Haven (if he was ever registered there) and double-dipping for President. Get my point?

CT Bob said...

LOL! Rest assured, BOB ADAMS is going to cast one vote, and one vote only!

But I get what you're saying. The big drawback on this kind of voting scam is that 1) you need to be the guy committing the fraud, thereby making yourself party to a crime and being legally liable; and 2) it only works once in each town; and 3) it's a lot of effort for minimal votes.

The GOPers have a more efficient way to skew elections: they hack the voting machines; they intimidate and disenfranchise legal voters; and they get the Supreme Court to rule in their favor.

You gotta give 'em credit. When it comes to defeating Democracy, you'll never do better than the Grand Old Party!

Bob Symmes said...

Only ONE VOTE????

Damn, I thought you were a good Democrat...as Bobby Kennedy famously said, "vote early and vote often."

RE: messing w/our votes: you're right -- isn't it odd that these Dieb... -- uh, suspect -- machines seem to show up in states where GOP decision makers prevail.

CT Bob said...

Congress may have to revisit HAVA and change some requirements, like making it mandatory to use paper ballots for voting. It's the only way to eliminate those unstable ATM-style machines. It won't solve all the problems, but it's a step in the right direction.