data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/04a90/04a90dd04381aefa7e532b59f7011471f467978d" alt=""
And the best sign of the day award so far goes to the man dressed in the GWB mask, holding a sign that reads, "Ann Coulter, Sean Hannity and I love Lieberman"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/8a608/8a608c388a1f0895c8288f1eb68724f58695a066" alt=""
On behalf of CTBob blog, and many of the other CT Bloggers, we welcome the Lieberman campaign to the blog world. We think that there should be a free-flowing exchange of ideas so voters can judge for themselves.
But let's get one thing straight. Lieberman's site was never hacked. It fell under its own weight on primary day and was overwhelmed with traffic it couldn't handle. There was no hacking. There were no dirty tricks. There was no action from outside forces. Bob and I are way too busy to waste our time messing with somebody else's site as we keep up our own, and I would bet that the rest of the CT Bloggers would say the same. So, if they get comments they don't like, or the site crashes again, or there are any technical mishaps, don't go looking at us.
2 comments:
Well, from what I understand the lieberman site *could* have been hacked, and the people who hosted their site claimed it was. However, no evidence was presented at the time and certainly nothing to implicate "Lamont supporters". But no definite evidence supporting the theory that it just went under from overload has been presented either so I think it might be a little premature to say "there was no hacking". All we know is that it went down, if the Lieberman people want to call it a hacking, they should provide the evidence.
50?!?! I counted 34 LieberFolk...
Post a Comment