There's absolutely NO WAY a supposed independent pollster should make a remark like this when discussing a poll:
"Lieberman, the once and future Democrat, is winning 73 percent of the Republican vote."
How is referring to a turncoat independent outcast as "the once and future Democrat" in any way an unbiased statement?
Where the hell is the MSM on this kind of obvious bias by the director of the Quinnipiac Poll? If you're going to quote the results of the poll, you should also address the fact that Doug Schwartz is a Lieberman supporter who can't keep his favoritism to himself.
Doug Schwartz is working so hard for Lieberman that he's trying to INFLUENCE the outcome of the election with his low-ball figures for Ned Lamont. How is this fair?